It's time to smash the Indie meme

I recently read an article based on a survey about what separates successful writers (in monetary terms) from others. The answer was a professional cover, an editor and paid marketing services. This applied to traditionally published, Indie and hybrid authors. It makes sense. If you jump through all the hoops to produce a quality book, success will follow.

I’ve avoided this subject but I’m going to speak up because a) I’m tired of the Indie meme that is so prevalent in reviews and b) because I agree with what’s being said. That meme is typos and lack of editing.

The result is Indie has developed a reputation for poor quality. In many cases, it’s deserved. Unfortunately, good Indie books are also tarnished by this bad rep. I read an Indie title this year which I literally couldn't put down and not because my e-reader was covered with glue.

The meme has spawned because traditionally published books are generally free from errors and usually edited by professionals. Indies lack those resources, but is that an excuse? I’m not saying my books are perfect (no book is perfect), but I do make as much effort as possible to ensure they have been edited and proof read.

Here’s my beef on the subject. I hear other Indies claim they don’t need an editor or a proof reader. They say a few errors don’t matter. I agree, a few don’t matter. Trad pub books usually have a few too, but never many.

I’ve read many excellent Indie books which are let down by errors on almost every page. Here’s the thing: the rules of grammar and punctuation exist to help the reader. Good grammar puts words in a logical order, supporting the flow of ideas. Punctuation is a set of visual clues that helps a reader interpret writing. Caring about these details shows you care about the reader. The reading experience is what a book is about.

There’s a vast community of Indie writers out there. Many are willing to swap time to help one another to produce professional books. For the love of the art and respect for the reader, why aren’t we working together to smash the meme and enjoy greater success? Feel free to comment.
4 likes ·   •  7 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 15, 2017 16:11
Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by James (new)

James Field Well put Michael.

Two things are painfully clear. 1: It's difficult to get reviews, especially since Amazon are now so strict with reciprocal reviews. 2: It's difficult to find beta readers.

We've tried swapping reviews, and we've tried swapping beta readings, but have we tried swapping reviews for beta readings? Might be worth considering.


message 2: by Eric (new)

Eric Tanafon Definitely a problem. I've noticed lately that even 'professional' books seem to have more errors than they once did.

I've volunteered to proofread, but so far no one has taken me up on it!


message 3: by James (new)

James Field Eric wrote: "Definitely a problem. I've noticed lately that even 'professional' books seem to have more errors than they once did.

I've volunteered to proofread, but so far no one has taken me up on it!"


Have you? What's the catch? ;-)


message 4: by Eric (last edited Jun 20, 2017 01:12PM) (new)

Eric Tanafon Have you? What's the catch? ;-)

no catch, I just failed to take a step backward... :)


message 5: by Michael (new)

Michael Gardner Speaking of stepping backwards, perhaps one answer might be to look at the past and give it a digital spin. Artists used to form like-minded collectives for fellowship, critical feedback and inspiration. They gave themselves a group name and used it to endorse their work. I've always liked Ranting Writers... ;-)


message 6: by David (new)

David Rose Totally agree with your post, Mike. I've tried to help fellow authors from time to time, with mixed responses. Now and again I run into a manuscript that has so many errors that I simply don't have time to list them all. So I send back advice, with the first two chapters (say) commented, and the author(s) simply doesn't seem to get it.

I'm always willing to lend a hand, whether it's proof- or beta-reading, for whatever my input is worth; and if I don't have the time I will say so up front.

Others have created web pages with links to editors, readers, illustrators, etc. Maybe we should find a way to start *pushing* the need to use these services. A monthly subscription newsletter/journal? I don't really know, but something is definitely needed before we're all either tarred with the 'Indie' bad rep, or else, from necessity, start distancing ourselves from that tag.

I just think that the whole Indie movement is valuable. There's a creativity among us which mainstream publishers are simply unable to let loose.


message 7: by Michael (last edited Jun 22, 2017 08:26PM) (new)

Michael Gardner Indeed. Well said, David. It's a pity about the mixed responses. I've had that too and have consequently stopped volunteering feedback. I won't mention typos or editing in my reviews as I don't want to perpetuate the meme, but I am knocking stars off my ratings.


back to top