The Pain of Strangers? But… but why?
The Pain of Strangers will be launched on Friday 11th February (if all goes according to plan). I\u2019ve been lucky in that I have an awesome ARC team who is, right now, ploughing through the 92k words. Some have already finished, and have reported back.\n The Pain of Strangers review:\n Murder, mayhem,\u00a0mystery and Eddie\u2019s inimitable dark humour make this a must read!!\u00a0\n\n But this little blog post isn\u2019t here to boast about the wonderful words they\u2019re writing in their reviews \u2013 and they are wonderful! (told you I was lucky).\n [image error]\n This little blog post is to get across the why\u2019s and wherefores of the book\u2019s very existence. Pull up a pew, grab a Cornetto and your fave packet of Haribo, and read on.\n Don\u2019t you wish that you could pause life, rewind, and take a different path sometimes? Surely, you must have made a mistake or two in your time, or shall we say, you could have made a better decision? I know I could have; I\u2019ve got certificates to prove it!\n The Pain of Strangers review:\n My new\u00a0favourite Eddie Collins book! Read in one sitting; laugh out loud moments, yuck – teeth clenching bits n of course read fast n don\u2019t breath moments! Perfect.\n\n Anyway, I\u2019m lucky yet again in that I\u2019m able to pause, rewind, and arrive at the problem, and correct it \u2013 at least in my own little book-world. The CSI Eddie Collins series is six books long, and I\u2019ve just set sail on the seventh novel (more on that a lot later); but if I cast my eye back to where it all began, I can see an error \u2013 a bad decision. I can correct it, though.\n [image error]\n That bad decision was The Third Rule. Woah, hold on \u2013 the bad decision wasn\u2019t the book as such, it was what it included. It included bits and pieces of politics in the background. In fact, the whole book is soiled by politics \u2013 not party politics, just\u2026 politics in general. When you consider this book was only ever meant to be a standalone, you might understand the error of my ways since then. You see, I liked writing Eddie Collins so much that I continued with him and grew a series from the first book. But the following books had no politics in them at all \u2013 they are good old-fashioned crime thriller books.\n The Third Rule, I realised a couple of years ago, didn\u2019t fit. It was the proverbial fish out of water. It has hampered sales ever since its creation because of this. It\u2019s a bugger to promote and market because it\u2019s not a true crime thriller and lives in categories different from its siblings on Amazon.\n The Pain of Strangers review:\n Andy knows how to insert the best humor\u00a0at the appropriate times to break up some of the intensity.\n\n So it\u2019s time to throw it back in the water but as a stand-alone story \u2013 just as nature intended.\n The upshot is this:\n I have removed The Third Rule from the CSI Eddie Collins series. I will fit it with a replacement cast of characters and re-launch it as a stand-alone novel.\n In its place as series opener, I am launching The Pain of Strangers. Book One, CSI Eddie Collins.\n The Pain of Strangers review:\n Make sure you have your seatbelt fastened because you won\u2019t want to put this book down.\n\n [image error]\n Yes, in The Third Rule, Eddie was married to Jilly and had a son called Sam. But now, in The Pain of Strangers, Eddie is married to Kelly, and they have a daughter called Becca. They are not the same book, and The Pain of Strangers is not just another book going in front of The Third Rule. I\u2019m taking The Third Rule out of the series.\n Please remember The Third Rule will not be populated by Eddie for much longer (if I had another pair of arms, I\u2019d be working on the cast of characters right now), so his wife and son are as irrelevant in that book as Eddie is himself.\n [image error]\n Grab yourself a copy of The Pain of Strangers \u2013 it\u2019s out Friday 11th February \u2013 and immerse yourself in the new series opener. When you\u2019ve read and enjoyed it (I hope you do!), move along to the next, Black by Rose, and enjoy the subtle differences caused by the new book.\n I wrote a blog post about this in May of 2021. Please follow the link and check it out: The Pain of Strangers blog post.\n But remember, if you want to add the current Eddie Collins edition of The Third Rule to your library, you\u2019d better get a move on. Before long it\u2019ll be deleted and replaced, and quite possibly become a collector\u2019s item. It\u2019s available in eBook and paperback here:\n Amazon UK\n Amazon US\n Amazon Everywhere Else\n You can also buy the eBook only on Kobo and Apple.\n \u00a0","tablet":" What follows is the answer to a question posed on the Exclusive Readers Group Facebook page by admin, Rudi Pan. Thanks for the question, Rudi.\n This post contains spoilers for The Death of Jessica Ripley and Ledston Luck.\n \"What was one of the most surprising things you learned in creating your books?\"\n\n The biggest surprise I first learned was that I could write a book. Physically, I mean, as well psychologically. I wonder sometimes if it\u2019s like running a marathon to those athletic types out there. It\u2019s a huge feat, really, but once you\u2019ve done your first, you know that barrier isn\u2019t there anymore \u2013 you\u2019ve overcome your first major hurdle.\n [image error]\n Then comes the problem of doing it again. And it is a problem, because the little monster on your shoulder tells you it was a fluke, and there\u2019s no way you could hit the bullseye twice! So you\u2019ve swapped one psychological problem for another \u2013 a straight exchange. I think that after your second book, that issue disappears \u2013 you know you can do it; you know you can string 100,000 words together. Phew, you did it again and it was no fluke!\n But are those words in the right order? Is the book any good?\n Damn, another psychological problem to overcome.\n I believe a huge number of people stumble on those three self-imposed issues. Imagine what you could do if you paid them no attention?\n [image error]\n To get to the specifics of your question, Rudi \u2013 what was the most surprising thing you learned in creating books? Okay, you will not believe me when I tell you. But here goes.\n One of the biggest reasons why I do not plan a book out thoroughly before I begin writing is that given the freedom a book will mostly write itself. If I put constraints in the way, I know the story will turn out stunted and malformed; and I know it will lack some of the surprising details people have come to expect.\n Here's an example.\n In The Death of Jessica Ripley, I had two new CSIs starting in Eddie\u2019s office. I was scrabbling around trying to give each a personality, something that readers would associate with them, but something not totally out of the ordinary. One of them had a drugs problem, remember? It was a shrug of the shoulder thing \u2013 I had no idea where that snippet came from, it certainly wasn\u2019t something I\u2019d intended putting in there, it just happened All By Itself. I knew I could bin the idea if it wasn\u2019t needed later or if the motivation of the character didn\u2019t quite fit with it. Later in the story I decided I could use this to illustrate how devious the other newbie was, and I could use it to illustrate how violent Eddie could be when provoked.\n It had lots of things going for it.\n But little did I know then that it would turn out to be something huge within the book \u2013 it would turn into its own subplot, and it would totally change everything by the ending of the book. This is exhilarating for a writer, but it can also be dangerous too.\n An All By Itself can completely derail a story and take it a million miles away from where you\u2019d intended it to go. They take a lot of thinking about, a lot of considering.\n [image error]\n They are sometimes called plot bunnies (because they can multiply quickly and tangle things up), and you need to be aware of them, and give them respect. They can make or break your story.\n Another example? In Ledston Luck, Eddie was having an argument with his boss \u2013 nothing new there, right? But in a come-back that came right from Eddie\u2019s mouth (nothing at all to do with me), he said, \u201cYou look like shit!\u201d It wasn\u2019t exactly a good put-down line, was it? So it must have had some other meaning, and that meaning was\u2026 the guy actually did look like shit, meaning he looked ill. It made me stop and it made me think. Again, later in the book, I couldn\u2019t help wondering why his boss looked ill. And then it dawned on me. He was the central figure in the book, he was the vortex that everything else rotated around. That was quite a profound moment for me, and it gave me renewed impetus to carry on and finish the book.\n Sometimes, these plot bunnies are out to ruin your book, or at least they add nothing of value to it. If that turns out to be the case \u2013 where you\u2019re presented with something you might be able to use to illustrate a point or to grow a character or to further the storyline or subplot, but all it does is turn to dust, then you\u2019re wasting words and you\u2019re wasting the reader\u2019s time. She doesn\u2019t need to see it if the story will stand without it being there, so ditch it, because if you don\u2019t, she\u2019ll remember it and when she closes the book will wonder what the hell the significance of it was? Did she miss something? And it\u2019ll bug her \u2013 it becomes a loose end, and no one likes those.\n How else does a book surprise me?\n [image error]\n When I\u2019ve nailed a plot, or when I\u2019ve created someone memorable, and chewed my way through eight or ten thousand words in a day, I leave the keyboard feeling like that marathon runner we opened with. I feel exhilarated, full of endorphins and pumped up. The flip side is when I\u2019ve spent hours struggling to push a story uphill and got nowhere for my efforts, I feel deflated and angry for wasting my time on the stupid thing!\n The mention of word count brings something else to mind too. A story doesn\u2019t become valuable to me until I hit 50,000 words. Hold up, that\u2019s a bit of a lie. Whenever I begin a new piece, I prepare a lot of computer files for it and upload it to clouds and memory sticks and such because I\u2019m desperate not to lose it \u2013 I\u2019m already in love with it, and I\u2019ve already spent hours thinking about it, which means I\u2019m invested in it; it means something to me. But anyway, I\u2019m usually good at convincing myself that the story will be a flop because I can\u2019t get the sodding thing past 50k. I begin obsessing about word count instead of story quality.\n Honestly, I need to have a word with myself. But I do it every single time, can\u2019t help it.\n As soon as I begin to focus on the story and ignore the word count, something quite strange happens. Yep, it grows so fast and so easily that it leaves me in shock. I wonder, dear reader, if you\u2019ve noticed the pace of my books picking up from about the halfway point? If so, this is the reason for it. By the end of the book I\u2019m thinking of ways to keep the word count down!\n To sum up: surprising things about writing books? They mess with your head.\n"}},"slug":"et_pb_text"}" data-et-multi-view-load-tablet-hidden="true"> The Pain of Strangers? But… Jilly. And Sam. But… but why? The Pain of Strangers will be launched on Friday 11th February (if all goes according to plan). I’ve been lucky in that I have an awesome ARC team who is, right now, ploughing through the 92k words. Some have already finished, and have reported back. The Pain of Strangers review: Murder, mayhem, mystery and Eddie’s inimitable dark humour make this a must read!! But this little blog post isn’t here to boast about the wonderful words they’re writing in their reviews – and they are wonderful! (told you I was lucky). This little blog post is to get across the why’s and wherefores of the book’s very existence. Pull up a pew, grab a Cornetto and your fave packet of Haribo, and read on. Don’t you wish that you could pause life, rewind, and take a different path sometimes? Surely, you must have made a mistake or two in your time, or shall we say, you could have made a better decision? I know I could have; I’ve got certificates to prove it! The Pain of Strangers review: My new favourite Eddie Collins book! Read in one sitting; laugh out loud moments, yuck – teeth clenching bits n of course read fast n don’t breath moments! Perfect. Anyway, I’m lucky yet again in that I’m able to pause, rewind, and arrive at the problem, and correct it – at least in my own little book-world. The CSI Eddie Collins series is six books long, and I’ve just set sail on the seventh novel (more on that a lot later); but if I cast my eye back to where it all began, I can see an error – a bad decision. I can correct it, though. That bad decision was The Third Rule. Woah, hold on – the bad decision wasn’t the book as such, it was what it included. It included bits and pieces of politics in the background. In fact, the whole book is soiled by politics – not party politics, just… politics in general. When you consider this book was only ever meant to be a standalone, you might understand the error of my ways since then. You see, I liked writing Eddie Collins so much that I continued with him and grew a series from the first book. But the following books had no politics in them at all – they are good old-fashioned crime thriller books. The Third Rule, I realised a couple of years ago, didn’t fit. It was the proverbial fish out of water. It has hampered sales ever since its creation because of this. It’s a bugger to promote and market because it’s not a true crime thriller and lives in categories different from its siblings on Amazon. The Pain of Strangers review: Andy knows how to insert the best humor at the appropriate times to break up some of the intensity. So it’s time to throw it back in the water but as a stand-alone story – just as nature intended. The upshot is this: I have removed The Third Rule from the CSI Eddie Collins series. I will fit it with a replacement cast of characters and re-launch it as a stand-alone novel. In its place as series opener, I am launching The Pain of Strangers. Book One, CSI Eddie Collins. The Pain of Strangers review: Make sure you have your seatbelt fastened because you won’t want to put this book down. Yes, in The Third Rule, Eddie was married to Jilly and had a son called Sam. But now, in The Pain of Strangers, Eddie is married to Kelly, and they have a daughter called Becca. They are not the same book, and The Pain of Strangers is not just another book going in front of The Third Rule. I’m taking The Third Rule out of the series. Please remember The Third Rule will not be populated by Eddie for much longer (if I had another pair of arms, I’d be working on the cast of characters right now), so his wife and son are as irrelevant in that book as Eddie is himself. Grab yourself a copy of The Pain of Strangers – it’s out Friday 11th February – and immerse yourself in the new series opener. When you’ve read and enjoyed it (I hope you do!), move along to the next, Black by Rose, and enjoy the subtle differences caused by the new book. I wrote a blog post about this in May of 2021. Please follow the link and check it out: The Pain of Strangers blog post. But remember, if you want to add the current Eddie Collins edition of The Third Rule to your library, you’d better get a move on. Before long it’ll be deleted and replaced, and quite possibly become a collector’s item. It’s available in eBook and paperback here: You can also buy the eBook only on Kobo and Apple. \n
\n
\n
\n
\n




The post The Pain of Strangers? But… but why? appeared first on Andrew Barrett.


