Happiness: Lessons from a New Science

by Richard Layard

There is a paradox at the heart of our lives. We all want more money, but as societies become richer, they do not become happier. This is not speculation: It's the story told by countless pieces of scientific research. We now have sophisticated ways of measuring how happy people are, and all the evidence shows that on average people have grown no happier in the last fifty years, even as average incomes have more than doubled. The central question the great economist Richard Layard asks in Happiness is this: If we really wanted to be happier, what would we do differently? First we'd have to see clearly what conditions generate happiness and then bend all our efforts toward producing them. That is what this book is about-the causes of happiness and the means we have to effect it. Until recently there was too little evidence to give a good answer to this essential question, but, Layard shows us, thanks to the integrated insights of psychology, sociology, applied economics, and other fields, we can now reach some firm conclusions, conclusions that will surprise you. Happiness is an illuminating road map, grounded in hard research, to a better, happier life for us all.

Genres: Psychology, Nonfiction, Economics, Science, Self Help, Philosophy, Personal Development

320 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 2005

About the author

Peter Richard Grenville Layard, Baron Layard FBA, is a British labour economist, currently working as programme director of the Centre for Economic Performance at the London School of Economics.

His early career focused on how to reduce unemployment and inequality. He was Senior Research Officer for the famous Robbins Committee on Higher Education. This committee's report led to the massive expansion of UK university education in the 1960s and 1970s.

Following research on happiness begun in the 1970s by economists such as Richard Easterlin at the University of Southern California, he has written about the economics of happiness, with one theme being the importance of non-income variables on aggregate happiness, including mental health.

His main current interest is how better mental health could improve our social and economic life. His work on mental health, including publishing The Depression Report in 2006, led to the establishment of the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme in England. He is co-editor of the World Happiness Report, with John F. Helliwell and Jeffrey Sachs.

Reviews

[Mohammad Hrabal · Rating 4 out of 5]

این کتاب توسط آقای مصطفی ملکیان در نوروز ۱۴۰۴ معرفی شد و بنا بر پیشنهاد ایشان خواندم.
*********************************************************************
«ریچارد لیارد به‌ نظر بسیاری از کسانی که در حوزه‌ی شادکامی کار می‌کنند بزرگ‌ترین صاحب‌ نظر این حوزه در جهان هست و به‌ نظر بعضی دیگر یکی از بزرگ‌ترین‌هاست در این حوزه، یعنی در حوزه‌ی خوشی زندگی و بهروزی زندگی. کتاب‌های متعددی در این باب و مقالات متعددتری لیارد نوشته‌ در باب خوشی زندگی و بهروزی زندگی. این کتاب که به‌ تازگی به زبان فارسی منتشر شده یکی از دو تا بهترین کتاب‌های لیارد در این باب هست، کتاب دیگری هم لیارد دارد تحت عنوان چگونه شادمانه‌تر بزی‌ایم، که خبر ندارم آن کتاب به زبان فارسی ترجمه شده یا نه. ولی به‌ هر حال این کتاب بسیار مهمی است از کتاب‌های لیارد. در اینجا لیارد می‌پردازد به بحث خوشی زندگی و بهروزی زندگی با تفاوتی که بین خوشی و بهروزی هست و نکات خیلی آموزنده‌ای در این کتاب می‌آورد، آموزندگی کتاب لیارد به این هست که فقط بحث فلسفی و نظری نیست، بلکه بحث‌های تجربی و آزمایشگاهی هم در این کتاب آمده، یعنی لیارد به‌ طور کلی یکی از بزرگ‌ترین ویژگی‌های آثارش این هست که مخلوطی‌اند از علم تجربی و فلسفه و بنابراین صرفاً نظریه‌پردازی و نظرآوری‌های فلسفی‌ای که جنبه‌ی پیشین دارند، جنبه عقلی دارند، در این کتاب‌ها و از جمله در این کتاب نمی‌آورد، بلکه خیلی تأیید می‌کند و پشتیبانی حاصل می‌کند برای آرای فلسفی خودش از تحقیقات لابراتواری و آزمایشی‌ای که در باب خوشی و شادکامی آمده و انجام گرفته است. ... زبان بسیار واضح نویسنده‌ هم در این که شما بتوانید این کتاب را با سرعت بیشتر بخوانید و بتوانید کاملاً هضم کنید مطالبش را خیلی کمک کننده است.» مصطفی ملکیان. از کلیپ معرفی کتاب توسط ایشان
دنیای بهتر؛ شادکامی را جدی بگیریم
پس تصویر من از جامعه بهتر - جامعه‌ای که در آن مردم احساس تهدید و فشار کمتری کنند و به راستی بتوانند از پایان قحطی و کمبودی که علم آن را ممکن ساخته است منتفع شوند - چه تصویری است؟ اگر هدف خود را به دستیابی به یک شیوه‌ی زندگی شادکامانه‌تر تغییر دهیم، چه‌ کار متفاوتی باید انجام دهیم؟
- باید بسط و گسترش شادکامی را در کشور با همان دقتی رصد کنیم که بسط و گسترش درآمد را رصد می‌کنیم.
- باید در نگرش خود در مورد بسیاری از موضوعات متداول تجدید نظر کنیم. باید نقشی را که مالیات در حفظ تعادل کار - زندگی ایفا می‌کند تصدیق کنیم. باید درباره‌ی حقوقی که در ازای عملکرد پرداخت می‌کنیم و احتمال تشویق مسابقه‌ی جاه‌طلبی بیندیشیم. باید موضوع تحرک جغرافیایی و احتمال افزایش جرم و جنایت و تضعیف خانواده و اجتماع را در نظر بگیریم.
- باید برای کمک به فقرا، به‌ ویژه جهان سوم، بیشتر هزینه کنیم. ایالات‌ متحده درحال‌ حاضر ۱۳/ درصد از درآمد خود و بریتانیا ۳۱/ درصد از درآمد خود را صرف کمک‌های خارجی می‌کنند. اکنون بهتر می‌دانیم این پول را چگونه خرج کنیم. اگر خواهان آن هستید که گرسنگی و بدبختی را از میان بردارید، بفرمایید، این مسیری آماده است. باید مفتخر باشیم که این هدف ما در جوامع مرفه باشد.
- ما باید بیشتر برای حل مشکلات بیماری‌های روانی هزینه کنیم. این یکی از بزرگ‌ترین خاستگاه‌های بدبختی در غرب است و آنان که خوش‌ اقبال‌ترند باید اطمینان حاصل کنند که با کسانی که به این بیماری‌ها مبتلایند رفتار بهتری می‌شود. روان‌پزشکی باید یکی از برترین شاخه‌های پزشکی باشد، نه یکی از کم اعتبارترین آنها.
- برای بهبود زندگی خانوادگی باید رویه‌هایی فراهم کنیم که کار بیرون را بیشتر خانواده پسند کنند - ساعت‌های کاری انعطاف‌پذیرتر، مرخصی بیشتر برای والدین و دسترسی آسان‌تر به خدمات مراقبت از کودک.
- باید به فعالیت‌هایی یارانه بدهیم که زندگی اجتماعی را ارتقا می‌بخشند.
- باید میزان زیاد بیکاری را از بین ببریم. اینجا سیاست چماق و هویج بهتر جواب می‌دهد. پس‌ از مدتی بیکاری، باید به همه فرصتی برای کار کردن داده شود، اما فرد باید از این فرصت برای تداوم حمایت دریافتی به‌ خوبی استفاده کند.
- برای مبارزه با افزایش مداوم نیازها، باید مانند سوئدی‌ها، تبلیغات تجاری را برای کودکان ممنوع سازیم. همچنین باید تخفیف‌های مالیاتی تجاری تبلیغات تصویری برای بزرگسالان را هم کاهش دهیم.
- درنهایت، و شاید مهم‌تر از همه، به آموزش بهتر نیاز داریم، ازجمله به آموزشی که می‌توان به آن آموزش اخلاقی گفت. باید اصول اخلاقی را نه به‌عنوان موضوعات جالبی برای بحث و گفتگو، که به‌عنوان حقایق ثابت شده‌ای آموزش دهیم که برای زندگی معنادار ضروری‌اند. صفحات ۲۳۹-۲۴۰ کتاب
جرمی بنتام اندک زمانی پیش‌ از مرگ نامه‌ای برای تولد دختر جوان یکی از دوستانش ارسال کرد که در آن نوشته بود: «بیافرین همه‌ی شادکامی‌هایی را که می‌توانی بیافرینی، از میان بردار همه‌ی تلخکامی‌هایی را که می‌توانی از میان برداری. هر روز امکانی است که قدری بر لذت دیگران بیفزایی یا قدری از رنج آنها بکاهی. به ازای هر دانه‌ی لذتی که درون دیگران می‌کاری، خرمنی از آن درون خود پیدا خواهی کرد؛ و همان هنگام که اندوهی از افکار و احساسات هم‌نوعانت می‌زدایی، آرامش و لذتی زیبا در محراب روح خودت جایگزین خواهد شد.» صفحات ۲۴۱-۲۴۲ کتاب
۱۴۰۴/۰۵/۱۹

[Nicole · Rating 1 out of 5]

First half: somewhat faulty science whose flaws were mildly offensive to my sensibilities. Example: a study of nuns showed that 21% of those most cheerful died in the following nine years, compared to 55% of least cheerful nuns. Layard claims this "shows how happiness can increase a person's life." How naively speculative to assume causality between these two variables!! Perhaps the nuns were happy for the very reason that they were healthy. Or maybe an outside variable (having family members visit to care for them) caused both correlations. The whole thing was silly and but one example of the flaws of the first half. Still, vaguely interesting, although not nearly as well-written as Daniel Gilbert's "Stumbling Upon Happiness" on roughly the same topics.

Second half: PAINFUL PREACHY PROPAGANDA on how to be happier. Layard discourages teachers treating religious ideas as "interesting topics for discussion" and advocates presenting them as "established truths." In his disucssion of cocaine, he snarkily refers to nicotine as "more gentle - it kills the body, not the soul." Had I not been reading this for a class, I would have thrown it across the room. UGH. In short: exactly what I feared might happen as I ventured into the self-help section to buy this last week.

[Katie · Rating 1 out of 5]

Layard is a follower of Bentham, and believes that human happiness is of paramount importance to society and to individuals themselves. In the introduction, Layard writes that the aim of the book is to "hasten the shift to a new perspective, where people’s feelings are treated as paramount."

So what is happiness? Layard's answer is thus: "Happiness is feeling good, and misery is feeling bad." Surely there's more to it than that? No - happiness is shown by ‘good feelings’ and is linked to the right side of the brain, with the left linked to ‘negative feelings’. Layard again states that it is ‘essentially correct’ to say that happiness is a state of ‘feeling good’. Such pleasure-seeking philosophy is suitable for the pigs, as Mill and Carlyle understood: “To suppose that life has no higher end than pleasure—no better and nobler object of desire and pursuit—they designate as utterly mean and groveling; as a doctrine worthy only of swine.”

Regardless, Layard's intentions, at least, are noble. So what of his methods?

He cites a couple of studies to support his hypotheses - in one, young nuns who reported greater feelings of happiness lived for longer. In another, actors who won oscars lived, on average, for four years longer than their nominated counterparts. Rather than an in-depth exploration of correlation and causation, Layard simply triumphantly writes that this phenomena is explained simply by "the gain in morale from winning".

I disagree with his focus on happiness over eudaemonia, but I lost respect for his 'new science' through the laziness and sloppiness of its most basic assumptions and arguments. There are far better and worthier works on utilitarianism that deserve your focus in lieu of this poor introduction.

[Nur · Rating 3 out of 5]

It took me a very long time to finish this book. There are some good ideas about reasearch on happiness and I certainly believe that it is very necessary to continue studying this field but I found the book a bit too boring. I really liked the first and last chapters, but those in between were too much for me. Yet, the conclusion are quite interesting and I agree with most of them. There were some interesting results and conclusions from different studies that made it worthwhile.

[Marie-Laure Riel · Rating 2 out of 5]

I had high hopes getting into this book since the author is an economist. But as many other reviews have highlighted, I felt like the arguments were weak (often seemed to confuse correlation and causality). I also found that the charts used in this essay were very hard to understand (and I work with data visualization on a daily basis at my work).
While I do not disagree with the main argument, that greater happiness should be a central goal in public policy, this book has failed to provide me with strong arguments to support that, and quite honestly I didn’t learn much in this reading. Maybe it’s because Layard work is starting to be dated?

[Brian · Rating 3 out of 5]

This book was pretty interesting. Layard is an economist and he talks about how it would seem better for nations to use a measure of happiness as a marker of progress rather than gross national product. He does a good job of evaluating the science of happiness (enough to satisfy my rather critical eye) and concludes that we can now measure happiness well enough in a meaningful way. The book ranges from the science of happiness, to the economics of producing happiness, and to the spiritual aspects of happiness (getting into meditation, etc.). A pretty well rounded review! I found some of its most thought provoking points to be how "relative" happiness is, and how that needs to be considered in public policy and in personal decisions. In the most basic example, raising the income of a poor person creates much more happiness than raising the income of a wealthy person by the same amount. If raising average income is our goal, then either option is viewed the same. In a somewhat related vein, we personally habituate ourselves to current lifestyles and comfort of living, making it so that we are continually seeking improvements and constantly comparing ourselves to others to assess our standing. Often we seek improvements through material things, which unfortunately are the things that we habituate to most quickly. Other things like friendship we seem to not habituate to, and thus may be more productive investments for happiness! The book also touches on the unfortunate phenomemon of the rat race at work and how frustrating this can be to everyone's happiness. The author proposes some solutions which I found interesting if not exactly likely in today's society. More than a blueprint for public policy, I found this book valuable for making me more cognizant of what makes me happy and highlighting some concepts to consider as I go about my life.

[Dark-Draco · Rating 2 out of 5]

This was truly not what I was expecting ... and not in a good way.

In the current Covid-19 crisis, I thought this might be the perfect book to pick up. I wouldn't usually touch 'self-help' books, but the back page blurb promises it discusses ways to stay cheerful so I thought it might be worth a try.

But this is isn't that sort of book.

The author is an economist and so his ides and theories are completely from that point of view. Not to say that they weren't interesting, but I did have to double check when this book was first published and was gobsmacked to see 2005 - some of the attitudes I would have put in the 60's. For instance, the brief discussion about changes in gender roles only talks about how women go out to work and it effects the family life so much - men are only mentioned as being made unhappy by the decrease in attention they have from their wives!!!! Huh!!!!

Sadly, the whole book feels like a good example of being able to manipulate statistics and quote scientific articles to back up your own opinions. I don't really have a huge problem with that as some of what this guy says is interesting and food for thought - just don't take it all as the gospel truth.

And if you are looking for exercises to help yo help improve you're own happiness - blink and you'll miss them. There's one short chapter, that mainly discusses Buddhist teachings and little else, before he quickly skips on to how drugs can help instead!

So read it for comparison but keep your mind open and read something else to help improve your mental health.

[Tony Crispin · Rating 5 out of 5]

This book tackles the economic understanding of happiness (line go up = happy) and confronts that with a new psychological understanding of what makes us tick. I appreciate Layard being very upfront with the moral and philosophical systems he's working off of and overall the book is very good at making its case of dissecting the traditional western ways of thinking about happiness and provides both societal and individual solutions for achieving the greatest happiness possible. It's all very eye opening (but probably more for beginners).
My only criticism is the last few chapters that talk about how therapy and drugs work, it doesn't really fit the overall form of the book but I understand why Layard put them all.
Overall it delivers what it sets out to do and that's all I ask.

[Ruth Baker · Rating 3 out of 5]

This is an I retesting book and pulls together the science and politics of happiness relatively well. It has an economics slant which is interesting but peculiarly emotionless given the subject matter. The philosophical side is based on Jeremy Benthams utilitarianism which I think is greatly flawed. His comparison with both Buddhism and Christianity is not well presented and doesn't exactly misinterpret those two religions but doesn't show the same understanding as the social, political and economic theories out forward

[Gawain · Rating 5 out of 5]

A book on the economics of happiness, that is mistakenly placed under psychology. Plainly - economists tend to be clumsy when counting happiness, and Layard gives us some tools to count correctly. In sum, love brings happiness. Money does, but not much past a middle class amount. We tend to compare ourselves to our neighbors.

Lots of neat little psychological truths about how we make economic decisions. For people who want to learn about economics but don't want the math.

[Miet · Rating 3 out of 5]

I'm being carefully positive about this book. Although I think the general ideas the author offers about happiness are correct, I did raise my eyebrows quite a lot while reading. Some of the studies described to make his point, seem almost too simple and not very trustworthy.

This book is 13 years old, I would like to see an update about it. Also, I would like to know more about the effect of overpopulation on our happiness, which I personally believe affects our lives.

[Holly · Rating 3 out of 5]

so far I really like this! Yes, part of my grad program - this week's topic: Taking Happiness Seriously.

I should send this book to my ex-husband. he thinks fun and happiness are utterly unimportant.


* * * * * *

Interesting - don't agree with everything, but written by an economist - so - what can I expect? However, he's moving in a good direction I think.

[Lee Osborne · Rating 3 out of 5]

I've got quite mixed feelings about this one. It has much of interest in it, but it felt a bit incoherent and muddled in places, with some ideas that seemed a bit strange and outdated even when it was published 20 years ago.

There's some interesting stuff in the book about what happiness is, what influences it (positively and negatively), and why we should strive to create a happier society. There's some thoughts on how we might achieve this, and that all seems to be sound stuff. There's practical ideas on policy here to create more stable families and economies, reduce conflict and crime, and tackle inequality. Sadly, political leaders in recent years don't seem to have taken much notice. Not sure what we can do about that, really.

Some of the book seemed quite oddly anachronistic, even taking into account when it was published. There's a lengthy chapter about the evils of television that reads like it was written by Mary Whitehouse. The internet doesn't get mentioned at all. I know it was less prominent in society in 2005 than it is now, but by that time I had broadband at home and was online a lot. For most people the internet was part of everyday life by then, even if we didn't carry it around in our pockets like we do now - so it seems a major omission.

Overall, the book comes across as a bit too conservative and preachy for my liking, but I'm probably influenced here by my very negative experience with organised religion.

The most useful stuff in the book was about what we can do personally to make ourselves happier, in terms of having fulfilling goals, healthy relationships, and helping others, among other things. As I say, interesting, and quite thought-provoking, if a little messy and not entirely satisfying.

[Rita · Rating 4 out of 5]

Good book overall, though not without its problems. Any truly scientific book cannot present facts as a given, because science is always changing and evolving (as seen now, 20 years after its publication, it's become somewhat outdated). The only certainty in life is its uncertainty.


Some quick take aways:

- We need connection
- We desperately want security and to trust others
- We are driven by status

- Happiness improves health

- Even though living conditions in first-world countries have improved, happiness has not. Once a status quo has been achieved, we will always look to the next thing (next purchase, next pay raise, etc)
- We feel happier when we've the same or more (income, means, possessions, etc) as those around us
- Our inner self (thoughts, feelings, mental health, etc) is more involved in our happiness than exterior conditions


What helps?
- Stable relationships (family & friends) & sense of community
- Healthy habits (good nutrition, exercise, sleep and water intake)
- Good mental health (through habits like meditation, feelings of gratitude, positive psychology & education of the spirit)
- Work-life balance & steady income
- Education
- Having well-defined morals and values
- Pursuit of the common good


What doesn't help?
- Excessive media consumption (TV, social media, advertisements, technology in general)
- Excessive comparison to others who have more than us (income, status, etc)
- Unemployment

[Aaron Michael · Rating 2 out of 5]

The Big Seven factors affecting happiness
(The first five are given in order of "importance")
⬜️1. Family relationships
✅2. Financial situation
✅3. Work
⬜️4. Community and friends
✅5. Health
✅Personal freedom
✅Personal values




Effects on happiness (fall in happiness)


Financial situation

Family income down by a third (2)


Family relationships

Divorced (rather than married) (5)
Separated (rather than married) (8)
Widowed (rather than married) (4)
Never married (rather than married) (4.5)
Cohabiting (rather than married) (2)


Work

Unemployed (rather than employed)(6)
Job insecure (rather than secure)(3)
Unemployment rate up 10 percentage points(3)


Community and friends

"In general, people can be trusted"
Percentage of citizens saying yes down by 50 percentage points (1.5)


Health

Subjective health down 1 point (on a 5-point scale)(6)


Personal freedom

Quality of government
Belarus 1995 rather than Hungary 1995 (5)


Personal values

"God is important in my life"
You say no to this rather than yes? (3.5)

[Jens Rinnelt · Rating 5 out of 5]

Refreshing to see that an economist suggest we should use happiness instead of money as an indicator for prosperity.

Richard Layard lays out seven causes of happiness from family to financial situation or income, work, community and friends, health, personal freedom, and personal values.

Based on scientific research the way for us to become more happy is to engage in a goal that is outside of ourselves. Taking part in the ongoing rat race and our human obsession for status prevents us from becoming happier. In other words: the world is too selfish. Or in the words of Layard:

“For our fundamental problem today is a lack of common feeling between people – the notion that life is essentially a competitive struggle”

A must read for everyone that wants to be more happy.

More insights on my blog:

http://www.humanbusiness.eu/happiness...

[YeJi · Rating 4 out of 5]

I was looking for a happier read after All Quiet on the Western Front then found this on my shelf. Although it isn’t what I expected it to be, I found it enjoyable to read through the economics principles that I have studied at school. Many of the papers were ones that I have already read, so the material wasn’t completely new to me. Richard Layard has researched a lot for this book, and it shows. He cites different papers to make a cohesive and well-rounded argument. Some parts of this non-fiction are dry, and I wish there were more case studies incorporated into this book.
Overall, I was happy to find a read that discusses happiness on economic terms, and refresh my memory on a lot of the subjects.

[Chad · Rating 3 out of 5]

Interesting summary of the research on happiness with some very strong opinions on how to apply it. I was a bit troubled by his assertion that mobility is bad for happiness, because research shows that when we live in communities with more "others"--those not like ourselves--there is more mental illness and crime. That's the last thing we need to hear in today's world. However, I do like his assertions that we can do more to educate youth on emotional intelligence, empathy, relationships, etc. I also like his assertion (clearly pushing back on the US economy) that increased work and productivity doesn't ultimately make us happier.

[Chris · Rating 4 out of 5]

Went into it thinking it'd be about the personal things we can do, but as Layard is an economist, a huge portion of the book was about classical v. behavioral economics and what government's role should be in increasing happiness. To be clear: this focus is a good thing, as it provides a blueprint for the types of actions governments can take. I just wasn't clear that it would be as much of a focus of the book as it was. A really solid read in conjunction with other works on Positive Psychology .

[Heidi · Rating 4 out of 5]

Lots of excellent data and research to explore what makes people happy and what steps you can take in your life to be happier. I'd be interested in what new data would show with the additions of social media as this book only covers the negative effects of television (given that it was published in 2005). But, plenty food for thought about the importance of family and community as well as a belief in a higher power. It is now the third book I've read that talks about the importance of meditation.

[Maria Beck · Rating 3 out of 5]

Denna bok berättar om den underliggande vetenskapen till många av LYCKANS teser, varav en understryker vikten av att sluta jämföra oss med andra. Våra upplevelser ger oss då större glädje. Ett lyckligt samhälle uppnås genom att vi uppbringar sympati för våra medmänniskor samtidigt som vi uppträder objektivt och opartiskt. Om vi aktivt gläder oss åt andras VÄLBEFINNANDE så skall vi allesammans bli LYCKLIGARE. Bokens många infallsvinklar och aspekter gör den intressant och läsvärd.

[Barbara Ab · Rating 3 out of 5]

Layard è un economista e il libro è un saggio molto down-to-earth sul livello di felicità al giorno d’oggi rispetto al dopoguerra in America e Europa. Malgrado sia stato scritto agli inizi del duemila è sotto molti punti di vista out-of-date. Lettura cmq piacevole in quanto saggio da “intrattenimento” e non accademico.

[David Barr · Rating 4 out of 5]

I expected a more economics-heavy book with policy suggestions since Layard is an economist by trade to my knowledge. He more argues that happiness is a real concept measurable and therefore should be the metric we optimize rather than GDP. He also goes over a few proven interventions to raise our happiness.

[Aleš Bednařík · Rating 4 out of 5]

Pekne a jednoducho napísaná kniha o šťastí z pohľadu ekonóma, takže obsahuje aj spoločenský pohľad na šťastie. Knihu napísal uznávaný britský ekonóm a ponúka aj pohľady na to, ako štát, spoločnosť a politika ovplyvňuje úroveň šťastia svojich občanov.

[David Laing · Rating 2 out of 5]

underwhelming

[Mario La Pergola · Rating 2 out of 5]

I feel this book left pretty much nothing of value in me after reading the last page

[Hugo · Rating 5 out of 5]

great little book worth a read if you're into what happiness means, how to measure it, and the implications for our children.

[Michelle · Rating 4 out of 5]

very interesting read

[Joe Denton · Rating 5 out of 5]

Very very good. 100% recommend

[Lauren Davis · Rating 3 out of 5]

The author’s thought on creating a non-competitive economy were interesting (see Bhutan), the rest often seemed flawed.