What do you think?
Rate this book
Imperfect Presidents: Tales of Misadventure and Triumph
Imperfect Tales of Misadventure and Jim Imperfect Tales of Misadventure and Fall River FIRST First Edition Thus, First Printing. Not price-clipped. Published by Fall River Press, 2010. Octavo. Hardcover. Book is very good. Dust jacket is very good with sticker remnants on the front panel. 100% positive feedback. 30 day money back guarantee. NEXT DAY SHIPPING! Excellent customer service. Please email with any questions. All books packed carefully and ship with free delivery confirmation/tracking. All books come with free bookmarks. Ships from Sag Harbor, New York.Seller 364766 History We Buy Books! Collections - Libraries - Estates - Individual Titles. Message us if you have books to sell!
256 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2007
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews
November 25, 2025
This book was very interesting. But, I have to say, the afterword was probably the best part. I found it very thought provoking.
February 27, 2012
Historians, like journalists, are supposed to be impartial, and as many of us have discovered - to our disappointment - too many of either are not. This author's leanings became more and more apparent the further I got into this book - too bad, because it could have been a much better read.
I do not agree with this man's assertion that Cold War policymakers made a mistake using the "Munich" analogy (named for Neville Chamberland of England who naiively appeased Hitler trying to ward off war) in dealing with the Soviet leadership - much of that leadership, namely Stalin, were very agressive in spreading Communism throughout the world during those decades following WWII. Appeasing them would not have been wise & diplomacy was used as often as Soviet dictators were willing.
I do agree, however, that a politician's choices in their personal lives should be considered when choosing a President because those choices can indeed affect other political decisions. He mentions a case in point that Americans should learn from: Clinton's numerous affairs that became embarrassingly public & primarily drove his decision to appoint his wife, Hilary, to head the Health Care initiative of the early 90's in order to appease/placate her.
Cullen shows his true colors, however, in his review of George W Bush's presidency calling him the worst President in American history. I believe this to be unfair & rather short-sighted because we now have the advantage of time to evaluate the other Presidents' true impact whereas, when this book went to publication it was 2007 - Bush's Presidency was not even over! Whether a bad President or not, I believe he at least deserves as much time as Clinton got for this analysis. Also, although I didn't agree with some of Bush's decisions, I certainly would not call him the worst President in U.S. History - that honor I believe goes to Mr. Woodrow Wilson whose naiivite cannot be matched (even by Ford) and whose lack of leadership is also unmatched (even by Obama).
I do not agree with this man's assertion that Cold War policymakers made a mistake using the "Munich" analogy (named for Neville Chamberland of England who naiively appeased Hitler trying to ward off war) in dealing with the Soviet leadership - much of that leadership, namely Stalin, were very agressive in spreading Communism throughout the world during those decades following WWII. Appeasing them would not have been wise & diplomacy was used as often as Soviet dictators were willing.
I do agree, however, that a politician's choices in their personal lives should be considered when choosing a President because those choices can indeed affect other political decisions. He mentions a case in point that Americans should learn from: Clinton's numerous affairs that became embarrassingly public & primarily drove his decision to appoint his wife, Hilary, to head the Health Care initiative of the early 90's in order to appease/placate her.
Cullen shows his true colors, however, in his review of George W Bush's presidency calling him the worst President in American history. I believe this to be unfair & rather short-sighted because we now have the advantage of time to evaluate the other Presidents' true impact whereas, when this book went to publication it was 2007 - Bush's Presidency was not even over! Whether a bad President or not, I believe he at least deserves as much time as Clinton got for this analysis. Also, although I didn't agree with some of Bush's decisions, I certainly would not call him the worst President in U.S. History - that honor I believe goes to Mr. Woodrow Wilson whose naiivite cannot be matched (even by Ford) and whose lack of leadership is also unmatched (even by Obama).
July 7, 2020
This author takes 10 Presidents, starting with George Washington and ending with George W and points out their imperfections, without denying their accomplishments. It makes for a very interesting way to look at these famous powerful men. The last chapter is what we want in a President, very thought provoking, especially this being election season,and we are dealing with the nightmare President Trump,with fears he might get re elected. I found this a amazing read.
August 16, 2011
Good light reading and its political history?! Short chapters about each President, juxtaposition the unsavory thing they did with the thing they did right. His point seems to be the same character flaws that make you do the wrong thing can often make you do the right thing.
July 8, 2009
loved it, good reading without the dullness
August 13, 2016
Eloquent.
March 22, 2012
I like this book because I felt like I was watching the news and time was moving as I read each conflict revolving around a situation
March 28, 2018
This book examines choices and mistakes done by our Chief Executives throughout history.
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews