Ritual y religión en la formación de la humanidad

Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology #110

by Roy A. Rappaport, Sabino Perea (Translator), Francisco Díez de Velasco (Series Editor)

Roy A. Rappaport mantiene que la religión es fundamental para la evolución de la vida, aunque se haya visto desplazada de su posición original de autoridad intelectual por el auge de la ciencia moderna. Ritual y religión en la formación de la humanidad aboga por que la religión puede y debe conciliarse con la ciencia. En este trabajo se combinan diferentes planteamientos sobre el estudio del género humano y se presenta un completo análisis sobre el significado evolutivo de la religión. Rappaport considera tan importante la religión como la invención del lenguaje y, por tanto, de la cultura tal y como la conocemos.
Además, realiza un detallado estudio sobre el componente principal de la religión, el ritual, que elabora concepciones que asumimos como religiosas y que han resultado fundamental para la capacidad de adaptación de la humanidad.

Desde hace más de medio siglo, ningún autor cualificado había acometido una reflexión seria sobre los orígenes de la religión. Esta labor emprendida por Rappaport convierte este interesante, polémico y bien ideado estudio en un clásico de la antropología, los estudios de historia de las religiones y, en general,de las humanidades.

Genres: Anthropology, Religion, Nonfiction, History, Philosophy, Spirituality, Science

671 pages, Paperback

First published March 25, 1999

About the author

Roy A. Rappaport was an American anthropologist known for his contributions to the anthropological study of ritual and to ecological anthropology.

Reviews

[Michael Ortega]

This book was the intellectual equivalent of running a marathon.

Contrary to the back flap description, this book is not one of how science has replaced religion in society, and how they must coexist if we are to continue playing "the existential game." This is a book about ritual. This book's premise is that human beings can only live if they create meaning in a meaningless world subject only to natural laws, and how ritual, in all its aspects, does that. Rappaport expertly outlines his argument, and follows it without deviation. This book is as much philosophical as it is anthropological, sociological, and psychological. A true masterpiece of scholarship detailing how humans beings have created meaning since the dawn of their existence.

[Eren Buğlalılar]

Yıllar önce okudum, hala aklımdan çıkmaz.

Kitabın yazarı antropolog kanser olup yalnızca bir senelik ömrü kaldığını öğrenince odasına kapanıp biriktirdiği ne varsa bu kitaba dökmüş. Bazı sosyal bilim kitaplarını okuyunca dünyanın şifresi çözülmüş gibi hissedersiniz ya, bende öyle olmuştu.

Uzun mu uzun, ama gözünüzü karartıp içine dalarsanız düşünce dünyanızda tuğla tuğla bir şeylerin inşa edildiğini hissedersiniz. Ömrünün son senesinde bir çok şey yapabilecekken oturup bu kitabı yazdığın için teşekkürler Roy Rappaport.

[Jaime]

Very tough for the non-Anthropologist, but utterly fascinating and gratifying.

[Mehmet Kalaycı]

This book is a labyrinth and pretty difficult to read. I found it really hard to get stuck in. I am disappointed because my expectations were high.

[Amber Manning]

"If evolution, human and otherwise, is to continue, humanity must think not only about the world, but on behalf of the world of which it has become a very special part [...]. We may recall here one of Heraclitus' modern interpreters (Kleinknecht, 1967 [...]): 'The particular Logos of Man... is part of the general Logos.... which achieves awareness in man.' The Logos, this is to say, can reach consciousness in the human mind and, so far as we know, only in the human mind. This proposes a view of human nature very different from, and I believe nobler than, Homo economicus, that golem of the economists into which life has been breathed not by the persuasiveness of their theory but by its coerciveness, and from the obsessive focus on reproduction attributed to individuals by evolutionary biologists. Humanity in in this view is not only a species among species. It is the part of the world through which the world as a whole can think about itself" (461).

[elisa day]

podoba mi się koncepcja Williama Jamesa; może jeszcze do siebie wrócimy

[Riversue]

This is dense and exacting but enlightening as well. It will warrant another read.

[Mario]

Podría ser más conciso pero es un libro interesante y lleno de buenas historias

[Joshua Myers]

A towering intellectual achievement. Also one of the most challenging books I have ever read.

[Emilia Pacurar]

Rappaport challenges the visions of evolutionary biologists and their obsessive focus on reproductive drives, and favours instead religious rituals when combined in liturgical orders and ecology of dreamtime.

[Toon Pepermans]

I didn't (yet?) read the chapters (2 to 12) on ritual

[Tom Isaacs]

Absolutely fantastic book on ritual and religion. Highly recommend.

[Leonard Singer]

This is for a post grad anthropology major; jargon dense; not for general reader.