Religions, as well as various philosophies and ideologies, can lead to actions of good deads, development of moral code with fair principles, and care for others. But same religions and ideologies can also be used both to justify actions not compatible with compassion for others, and to increase differences between different groups of people based on their gender, social status, sexual orientation, etc. The latter aspect is too often seen in many religious fundamentalist groups nowadays, which is sad, as it undermines the democratic process in many countries and takes away the freedoms from groups and individuals who do not abide by the same principles.
Gandhi was deeply religious. But he used his belief in God to advance the democratic values, believing in equality and value of all people, creating (or, rather, expanding on Tolstoy’s philosophy) a non-violence method - probably one of the most important tools of advanced civilization in human history - in the process. And despite that huge religious gap between him, as a teller, and me, as a reader, I find myself being completely synched with his wolrdview. Yes, his teachings are inspiring, and his words are basically a definition of wisdom, but what I relate mostly to is his actions. Too many religious groups nowadays claim many things - or refer to texts in holy scripts - that might sound reasonable to many, but then the atrocious actions with disregard for human life and freedoms nullify everything, and one can only wonder: how did we get here? How did we end up in a world of misogynistic, patriarchal principles, ruled by not the wisest but by the loudest?
Gandhi inspires - with actions and words. His actions are louder than words - but his words are wisdom that is equally contemporaneous now as it was a century ago.
Below are some quotes from the book which either resonated with me a lot, or gave a nutshell-explanation of Gandhi’s major standpoints:
“To me God is Truth and Love; God is ethics and morality”
“Indeed religion should pervade every one of our actions. Here religion does not mean sectarianism. It means a belief in ordered moral government of the universe. It is not less real because it is unseen. This religion transcends Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, etc. It does not supersede them. It harmonizes them and gives them reality.”
“Religions are different roads converging to the same point. What does it matter that we take different roads, so long as we reach the same goal? In reality, there are as many religions as there are individuals.”
“In a sense, even today there is one fundamental religion in the world. But there is no such thing as a straight line in nature. Religion is one tree with many branches. As branches, you may say religions are many, but as tree, religion is only one.”
“Untouchability may be considered to be an ancient tradition, the institution of child widowhood and child marriage may be considered to be an ancient tradition, and even so many an ancient horrible belief and superstitious practice. I would sweep them out of existence if I had the power. ”
“We often confuse spiritual knowledge with spiritual attainment. Spirituality is not a matter of knowing scriptures and engaging in philosophical discussions. It is a matter of heart culture, of unmeasurable strength.”
“A certain degree of physical harmony and comfort is necessary, but above that level, it becomes a hindrance instead of a help. Therefore the ideal of creating an unlimited number of wants and satisfying them seems to be a delusion and a snare.”
“And why is there all this morbid anxiety about female purity? Have women any say in the matter of male purity? We hear nothing of women’s anxiety about men’s chastity. Why should men arrogate to themselves the right to regulate female purity?”
“I have never made a fetish of consistency. I am a votary of Truth and I must say what I feel and think at a given moment on the question, without regard to what I may have said before on it…. As my vision gets clearer, my views must grow clearer with daily practice. Where I have deliberately altered an opinion, the change should be obvious. Only a careful eye would notice a gradual and imperceptible evolution.”