Unfortunately, after the highs of the second book in the Typhon Pact series, "Seize the Fire" focusing on the crew of the Titan and the Gorn, "Rough Beasts of Empire," hits a nadir. This book focuses on the divided Romulan Empire, and also marginally on the lesser known and mysterious Tzenkethi. This book is split into three story arcs - or maybe 2.5. One story arc focuses on Spock and his reunification movement, and on the political intrigue between the Romulan Star Empire lead by Praetor Tal'Aura and the Imperial Romulan State lead by Empress Donatra of Star Trek Nemesis fame, and then finally the third story arc strangely focuses on Captain Benjamin Sisko and what has happened to him since his re-emergence from the celestial temple (aka the Bajoran Wormhole) and his corporeal life on Bajor with Kasidy Yates and their daughter Rebecca.
In any case - let's break this review down into two categories: plot and character development, and Trek "metaverse" development.
PLOT/CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT
To me, the most intriguing of the three arcs in this book is that of the internal Romulan political intrigue. This book deals with the divided Romulan Empire. Donatra, after the events of Star Trek Nemesis and the Titan book "Taking Wing" Donatra splits off from the Romulan Star Empire to found the Imperial Romulan State - formally recognized by the Federation and the Klingon Empire, the IRS (hehe) is about equally matched militarily with the Star Empire, and has a leg up on worlds that form the "bread basket" of the former Star Empire. The RSE, in contrast, is a member of the newly formed Typhon Pact, nearly equally matched militarily with the IRS, and has its capital on Romulus, the traditional seat of the Romulan Empire, and therefore has the inertia of being "home" to all Romulans. The arc focuses more on Tal'Aura, the praetor of the RSE, and her maneuvers to consolidate her power by reconstituting the Senate (which was destroyed by Shinzon in Nemesis), and allowing Spock's reunification movement to come out of the shadows and become a mainstream political movement. Tal'Aura seems like she is a moderate, calculating leader with these moves. We also see some old TNG friends in this story arc: Tomalak, now Proconsul, and Sela has a small bit part, murdering the current head of the Tal Shiar, and then at the end of the book, becoming the head of the secretive Romulan intelligence agency.
Donatra really gets the short straw in this book - she is outmaneuvered by Tal'Aura, and eventually commits suicide in prison on Romulus. This is such an ignoble end to such noble character as Donatra. She is the one that came to the Enterprise's aid in the battle with Shinzon, and she had the moxy to breakaway from the RSE to form the IRS and challenge the galactic status quo. George really does her character a disservice by killing her off in the way he did - suicide in a jail cell? C'mon - she deserved more than this. Donatra was a true patriot in my eyes, and I believe she could have been the one Romulan to offer a real rapprochement with the Federation, and even perhaps a detente or treaty that was "hoped" for by Captain Picard and the Romulan Commander in "The Chase," and later between Picard and Donatra herself in Nemesis.
The Romulan arc is later tidily summed up by George by showing the real tiger in the Typhon Pact, the Tzenkethi. How odd that such a mysterious and undeveloped race in the Trek universe can somehow manipulate one of the most developed, and most cunning Trek adversaries, the Romulans. I just don't buy the fact the the Tzenkethi, a moderate, second rate power in the galaxy can effectively assassinate the Romulan praetor, and a powerful Senator, and then place their own preferred praetor to power. George most likely does this as a check to most Trek fans to let them know that the Romulans are not the real power in the Typhon Pact, but it just comes across as implausible. I simply cannot see the Romulans being played like they were in this book. The Romulans are usually the players, not the played.
The Spock arc was also a let down. I've often wondered at the logic of Spock's reunification movement ever since the first time I saw "Reunification" all those years ago with TNG. Why would Spock think a mercurial, paranoid, emotional, militaristic race such as the Romulans ever want to reunify with their ancient Vulcan brothers - a race known for their lack of emotions, their embrace of logic and peaceful cooperation, and the 800-pound gorilla in the room - THE VULCANS ARE PART OF THE FEDERATION! The Romulans' arch-enemy! At its outset, the reunification movement just seemed illogical to me. I expected better of Spock - he was always so awesome in TOS and the movies...that he would become so illogical and seemingly gullible seems so un-Spock-like. And like Donatra and Tal'Aura, Spock is played in this book as well. Again - I just don't see Spock being played. Or maybe he's just growing senile in his older age, and is not on his game like he was when he was aboard the Enterprise-1701. Basically, Spock was nearly assassinated by a Reman, and then used by Tal'Aura to achieve her own reunification of the two Romulan empires...with Spock's movement only marginally gaining the ability to discuss Romulan-Vulcan reunification openly in Romulan society (kind of a Romulan version of the First Amendment of the US Constitution). Big whoop! Spock was played, and his story arc was rather flat.
Now we get to the most disappointing, and peculiar arc of the book: the Sisko arc.
I am not sure why Sisko's story arc was put in this book - perhaps to flesh out the Tzenkethi? David R. George III is usually one of the better Trek authors, but this time I am curious as to what he was thinking. We start out with Sisko commanding a ship in the Battle of Alonis with the Borg during the recent Borg holocaust, so expertly written by David Mack with the "Unity" omnibus. Sisko commands a small fleet of three ships to go up against six Borg cubes. One of the other ships in the fleet is captain by Elias Vaughn, the former first officer of Deep Space Nine after Sisko left to be with the Prophets. I find it strange that two former DS9 officers just happen to be captaining starships protecting the same planet in such a BIG Federation...but all of this is a means to fit the end of George's lackluster Typhon Pact novel. After losing Vaughn, and thousands of people dying on the surface of Alonis, Sisko once again leaves Starfleet when he learns shortly after the Borg attack that his father back on Earth has passed away. This wasn't too much of a surprise, because we all knew how old Sisko's dad was from the DS9 tv show. But what IS a surprise is Sisko's reaction to his father's death. He goes back to Earth and manages to not act like the decisive man we have come to know him as when he commanded DS9 through some harrowing years. Instead, Benjamin Sisko acts like a mopey, whining shell of his former self that just wants to revel in his own pity party. The way George depicts Sisko in this book makes you wonder if George really knows the man Sisko is. This is NOT the Sisko I came to know and love from DS9.
After the Borg holocaust and his father's death, Sisko leaves Starfleet...but magically, within a few pages, and a "We need you," speech from Admiral Akaar at Starfleet Command, Sisko is "back in" as a Captain in Starfleet, and given command of a Galaxy Class starship, the Robinson. He then heads back to Bajor to explain to his wife Kasidy his decision to leave them there, and go serve the Federation in its time of need. Again - this is very un-Sisko-like. Sisko is a family man...he would never abandon his wife and daughter - especially with what happened to him an Jennifer with Jake. But he does. He just up and leaves. Before he departs Bajor, he consults an orb at a monastery, but the prophets do not speak to him, so once again we are treated to Sisko feeling sorry for himself, this time because the prophets have left him, and he no longer feels like his is the Emissary. Boo freakin' hoo. He has a chance meeting with now Vedek Kira (which I can see happening) that does not make him feel any better.
We then find an isolated, grumpy, mopey, unprofessional Captain Sisko commanding the USS Robinson patrolling the border(s) with the Romulans. He isolates himself from his crew, and is downright grumpy and mean. Then George takes the novel, and turns it back 20 years in time with an awkward "flashback" that seems very out of place. We all know that Captain Sisko mentioned on several occasions in the Deep Space Nine tv show that he was a part of the one or two "wars" the Federation fought with the Tzenkethi. These "wars" may have been analogous to America's "police action" in Operation Desert Storm - technically a war, but nowhere near the commitment of a war like Vietnam, World War II, or even the second Iraq War of the 2000s. Even with George's description of Sisko's involvement in the Tzenkethi war(s), one gets the impression that the existence of the Federation was never in danger, as it was with the Dominion War and the recent Borg holocaust. This flashback however, does little to help you understand the Tzenkethi's motivations for the war, other than how their society is set up (and their society isn't even described in this flashback, but in the Romulan story-arc). Maybe the flashback was to inject some shoot 'em up-bang 'em up action into an otherwise boring dull novel? I don't know...but it was bad.
Sisko is then given a mission to go to Achernar Prime (the IRS capital) to meet with Donatra because he is an "expert" in Romulan politics. Uh...ok...I guess Sisko is a Romulan expert from his time in the Dominion War, and conveniently his time at the Federation Embassy on Romulus when he was a junior officer. Wait a minute! Sisko would have been a junior officer in the 2350s - well before the Romulans re-emergence into galactic affairs in 2364 (TNG episode "The Neutral Zone.") This is sloppy story telling here...there is no way Sisko could have been assigned to Romulus as a junior officer, because there was no diplomatic relations with the RSE! Nothing upsets me more than inconsistency in Trek - when it is so easy to do some research and get it right. C'mon George! If anyone is an expert in Romulan politics, it would be Picard...too bad this book wasn't about him. Sisko's arc was sewn up with him divorcing Kasidy, and leaving her to raise their 4 year old daughter alone, and him continuing his service aboard the Robinson. Who is this man, and what have you done with Benjamin Sisko, George? **weeps**
METAVERSE DEVELOPMENT
The recent books (from the Unity Omnibus through to the Typhon Pact) have been AMAZING. Picking up where Nemesis left off, we get to find out what happens to almost all of our favorite characters from the Enterprise-E, DS9, Titan, and Voyager. It's like you're watching the television show again - with great crossover from all the crews.
The Typon Pact series of books so far has been kind of flat in storytelling and excitement, but they have had a lot of political development. Even though this book basically stinks, there is a lot of meat on the political bone. The Romulan Empire is one again, the Typhon Pact is stronger and more stable, and we learn more about the Federation's recovery from the Bord holocaust. George does succeed in giving you a sense that there is more to come, and more impending doom. For that, this Typhon Pact book moves the story along nicely. The political development is pretty much the only good part of this book, and will leave you wanting more.
There is one Trek thing I take issue with from George - he is TERRIBLE at naming starships. Usually we are treated to great names on Star Trek starships: Enterprise, Defiant, Voyager, Titan, Aventine, Odyssey, Challenger, and on and on. Instead, George names his ships in this book as if they are US Naval vessels. The Nebula Class USS New York? Boring. The USS James T. Kirk...ok, I can see that, but how many other Starfleet ships have been named after former captains, and then use all three names? Not even all three names - the ship's name holds an initial. An initial as an official name of a starship! Why not just leave it as the USS Kirk? The "James T." is not needed. We all know which Kirk you're talking about if this is a Star Trek story. And Akira Class? Don't you think a ship named after one of the greatest captains in Starfleet should be maybe a capital ship like maybe a Galaxy or Sovereign Class vessel? The other ship in the task force commanded by Sisko over Alonis during the Borg incursion is the USS Cutlass, class unknown. Cutlass...that's a cool name, but still somewhat unimaginative. It's like George (a former New York resident himself) was grasping for ship names - oh! I'll name one after my former home-state, and oh look! An Oldsmobile Cutlass just drove by! Boom! USS Cutlass! Ok...one more ship name needed...man I wish I was writing about Captain Kirk...ooh! USS Kirk! Please.
Then Captain Sisko is given command of a big, capital ship, the Galaxy Class USS Robinson. The Robinson? Which Robinson is it named after, and why would one of the most graceful, large, most powerful ships in Starfleet be given such an innocuous name, when others from that class have been named Galaxy, Enterprise, Yamato, Challenger, Odyssey, etc? Snore.
Last two = from the flashback scene in the Tzenkethi police action - Sisko's former ship, the Okinawa (ok...that's a good name for a ship...especially one for the ubiquitous Excelsior Class), and then the Ambassador Class USS Assurance. Hmmm...Assurance...ok...that's somewhat regal for a ship-of-the-line like an Ambassador Class. So out of six Starfleet vessels in this book, only ONE has a good name, and it ends up being destroyed and crash landing on a planet.
WHAT IN HADES, GEORGE?!?!?!?
This book deserves 2 stars, maybe less. But I'm looking forward to "Paths of Disharmony," the next installment in the Typhon Pact series, set on the Enterprise-E with Captain Picard. Let's hope Dayton Ward, author of "Paths..." gets the characters right. If he screws up Picard like George screwed up Sisko, I'm gonna look for the nearest black hole.