Il Cristianesimo edonista

Contre-histoire de la philosophie #2

by Michel Onfray, Gregorio De Paola (Translator)

Democrito e Diogene, Aristippo ed Epicuro non sono di solito considerati i "campioni" della filosofia greca. Eppure, nelle "Saggezze antiche", Onfray ha dimostrato che non hanno niente da invidiare a Platone e Aristotele. Ora, in questo secondo volume della "Controstoria della filosofia", Onfray, teorico per eccellenza dell'ateismo, non ha paura di andare a scoprire proprio il lato più nascosto della tradizione medievale: il cristianesimo edonista. In questa rassegna filosofica, pertanto, non si troveranno sant'Agostino né san Tommaso, ma personaggi dei quali non v'è quasi traccia nei manuali ufficiali, come gli gnostici Basilide e Carpocrate, accanto ai più famosi Lorenzo Valla, Marsilio Ficino, Erasmo da Rotterdam. Pensatori molto diversi fra loro, accomunati però dalla lontananza dall'ideale ascetico, da un progetto che rimanda la felicità alla sfera oltremondana; e tenaci propugnatori di un modello di vita che realizzi qui, su questa terra, quella "saggezza felice" che è la vera vocazione di un sapere capace di porsi come arte del "buon vivere". Il cristianesimo edonista si chiude con l'analisi della figura di Michel de Montaigne, al quale sono riservate le ultime cento pagine.

Genres: Philosophy

291 pages, Paperback

First published February 15, 2006

About the author

Michel Onfray is a French philosopher. Born to a family of Norman farmers, he graduated with a Ph.D. in philosophy. He taught this subject to senior students at a technical high school in Caen between 1983 and 2002, before establishing what he and his supporters call the Université populaire de Caen, proclaiming its foundation on a free-of-charge basis, and the manifesto written by Onfray in 2004 (La communauté philosophique). However, the title 'Popular University' is misleading, although attractive, as this 'University' provides no services other than the occasional delivery of lectures - there is no register of students, no examination or assessment, and no diplomas. After all, 'ordinary' French University lectures are open to all, free of charge. Nor is the content of the Université populaire de Caen radical in French terms, it is in its way, a throwback to less democratic traditions of learning. Both in his writing and his lecturing, Onfray's approach is hierarchical, and elitist. He prefers to say though that his 'university' is committed to deliver high-level knowledge to the masses, as opposed to the more common approach of vulgarizing philosophic concepts through easy-to-read books such as "Philosophy for Well-being".

Onfray writes obscurely that there is no philosophy without psychoanalysis. Perhaps paradoxically, he proclaims himself as an adamant atheist (something more novel in France than elsewhere - indeed his book, 'Atheist Manifesto', was briefly in the 'bestsellers' list in France) and he considers religion to be indefensible. He instead regards himself as being part of the tradition of individualist anarchism, a tradition that he claims is at work throughout the entire history of philosophy and that he is seeking to revive amidst modern schools of philosophy that he feels are cynical and epicurean. His writings celebrate hedonism, reason and atheism.

He endorsed the French Revolutionary Communist League and its candidate for the French presidency, Olivier Besancenot in the 2002 election, although this is somewhat at odds with the libertarian socialism he advocates in his writings.[citation needed] In 2007, he endorsed José Bové - but eventually voted for Olivier Besancenot - , and conducted an interview with the future French President, who he declared was an 'ideological enemy' Nicolas Sarkozy for Philosophie Magazine.

Onfray himself attributes the birth of a philosophic communities such as the université populaire to the results of the French presidential election, 2002.

Reviews

[Esteban · Rating 1 out of 5]

Como de costumbre, Onfray deja pasar docenas de oportunidades de escribir algo inteligente. Pero no solo las desaprovecha, sino que además se deja llevar por la retórica anticristiana al punto de entorpecer la presentación de los autores y las ideas que pretende exponer. A pesar de compartir algunas convicciones con él - o precisamente por eso - leerlo me irrita mucho. Además, a diferencia del siguiente tomo de su contrahistoria de la filosofía, Onfray trabaja con materiales culturalmente mucho más distantes, y la escasa familiaridad con las fuentes le supone un obstáculo adicional. Evitenlo.

[Dalia · Rating 2 out of 5]

Creștinism și hedonism, doi termeni care se exclud din start.

[Margherita · Rating 3 out of 5]

ziopera la parte sul libero spirito è bellissima, poi parla di montaigne troppo a lungo per i miei gusti personali. sicuramente onfray è di parte, passionalmente di parte, non ha la prudenza dello storico. però simpatico, spassoso, piacevole nell'insieme.