I read Vesper in a four week period, sitting down every once and a while to read a bit here and there. So this may be the reason why this book irked me to no end.
There are some books with brilliantly new ideas which are brilliantly done, although books like this are sparse and few. There are also books orbiting around a "used" idea, but is recycled and made into something totally different, although it still has that lingering feeling which reminds you of other books in that specific category. Vesper was a mix of both. It was on the verge of actually being something worth my picky-minded time, but then some little 90-degree bumps along the way completely ruined my assumptions.
I did not like the "recorded-interview" session thingy that began the book. It's been done before, actually by a lot of books I've read, and it really annoyed me because these faux-interviews never actually got to the point. They just semi-explain the whos, whats, whens, wheres, and whys in the story, and their little explanations are never really necessary. So it is reasonable, in my opinion, to say that Vesper could've gone better if it had been written in flashback mode WHILE the character was being interviewed. Or, even better, (since in the book, the main character tells her interviewer that she had already written an entire account on the events that had happened to her, which I don't really get because if she'd already written basically a mini-novel on her life (which she was forced to do), then what was the point of being interviewed? What I mean to say is, what is the point of having the interviewing actually be part of the book?) the book could've just been Emily's story that she had been forced to write down. You can make cupcakes any way you want, but adding too much frosting and sprinkles can ruin the overall taste of the cupcake.
The plot line was very jaunty and messy. Also, I understand that the main reason why the author decided to be so simple and keep to a main idea was to keep the reader's interest, but really, he was a little to brief. This book could've been longer and have had a lot more events that occured in it which would still have kept my interest.
The book focuses mainly on Emily and her newly discovered superpowers. And when I say focus, I really mean, "all i'm going to write about is Emily partyin, partyin, YEAH, until I get tired and introduce some new characters at the end so that the reader will want to read and find out more about what happens. Ha, see? I've written a book with almost no filling and all crust! More readers=MORE MONEY" We all knew that she was either going to find out that she was a myth-ey creature (vampire, werewolf), a creation, or "accident" by scientists, or had gotten traditional family traits (although that was very unlikely the minute her family is introduced). So the author decided to keep us going, chapter after chapter, with Emily going on midnight adventures, partying like a macho-pyscho, which was just as uncomfortable for the reader as it was for Emily, before actually getting on to the real stuff. We find out that Emily was generated by some weird eco-company or another, classmates were killed because of this and that, blah blah blah, etc., etc., etc., until she gets picked up by some nerdy guy from the eco-company.
The ending was the best part of the entire book. It introduced all action, (very BRIEF action, which only partially explained some of the stuff that had happened in the book) and had a pretty crummy cliffhanger. A really annoying cliffhanger. A cliffhanger that screamed "I"M GONNA MAKE MORE MONEY YAH, YES I WILL I JUST GOTTA MAKE THEM READERS INTERESTED, YAH."
And to be honest, I was hooked on that ending like a rebellious teen gets hooked on drugs. Okay, not the best example. But seriously, that ending drove me nuts like a squirrel after all its nuts which it had stored away for winter gets stolen by some bandits.
So, yes, I will definitely read the next book in this series. Although, at the end, I think the author could have explained what "Vesper" actually meant. That word gets introduced about 1/4 into the book, and the effect of it wasn't very powerful if you didn't know what it meant. Also, "deviants"? Really? That kind of stuff irritates me like a straight line. (Straight lines go on forever on a graph) Really, it's okay to introduce realistic, REASONABLE, words that actual people would use. Not every book has to have interesting words that sparkle on every page.
Although, on a positive note, I liked the pop culture references. A lot of books use normal similes, metaphors, etc., but this book didn't include any of that flowery Shakespeare stuff.
As for the characters, I liked that Emily wasn't beautiful, gorgeous, model damsel-in-distress material. That would have been over the top. She was someone very much relateable, although the quick personality changes when she turned into Cool Emily at night weren't very believable. (It was all, "I gasped. Me? Fat? This guy called me fat and wished I was dead instead of Gorgeous Emily just because he likes how Gorgeous Emily looks? I feel ready to cry. Really. I do." and then suddenly, Emily turns into Cool Emily and uses a line like this: "I laughed. Who cares what that guy thinks? He's not so skinny himself. Let's go party instead! Yeah! So much more interesting than staring at a depressing blog comment! *hops out window*" And this kind of thing happened everytime Emily Turned Cool. So half the book was tugging at my patience.)
Emily's bestie bugged the crap out of me. She was whiny, bratty, annoying, whiny, bratty, selfish, blahh.... So stypical. (I just merged stereotypical and typical, haha wow.) I'm not really sure why Emily was best friends with basically a female dog who hated everyone else. I would have dumped my lunch over her head.
I have a lot more to say about Vesper, but I won't bore anyone because then it would be longer than the book itself.