In this ground-breaking study, Sterling Stuckey, a leading cultural historian and authority on slavery, explains how different African peoples interacted on the plantations of the South to achieve a common culture. He argues that, at the time of emancipation, slaves still remained essentially African in culture, a conclusion with profound implications for theories of black liberation and for the future of race relations in America. Drawing evidence from the anthropology and art history of Central and West African cultural traditions and exploring the folklore of the American slave, Stuckey reveals an intrinsic Pan-African impulse that contributed to the formation of the black ethos in slavery. He presents fascinating profiles of such nineteenth-century figures as David Walker, Henry Highland Garnet, and Frederick Douglass, as well as detailed examinations into the lives and careers of W.E.B. Du Bois and Paul Robeson in this century.
There'a an article length version of this book, originally published in The Massachusetts Review, which gives you everything you need. I remember being very excited when this book appeared and extremely disappointed when I read it. The notion of nationalism in the book flattens out the nuance of the article, which is a useful complement to Lawrence Levine's vastly superior Black Culture and Black Consciousness.
The only thing I can hold against this book is the title "Slave Culture", which implies that the slave status itself created a culture which was crucial in the context of the subject of the book. In the text of the book however, it is shown that the links to various African cultures and African cultural heritage which was the crucial factors in African-American nationalist theory and the foundations of black America.
So apart from the title, the book is brilliant, thorough and all through very interesting indeed.
Genuinely loved this book and consider it a must read for all Pan-Africanists. I have some differences with the author in my framework and vision for African liberation but at this point, that is an inevitability given how strong my opinions are on the matter. What I got out of this book was a lineage or roadmap of the emergence of Pan-Africanism in the Americas, particularly the United States, and then how the Pan-African objective was transmitted from generation to generation through the revolutionary intelligentsia as represented by specific figures: David Walker, Henry Highland Garnet, W.E.B. DuBois and Paul Robeson. There's so much about this book that I just adored. Africans in the United States are indisputably Africans and this book proves it.
According to its subtitle Slave Culture was directed toward the foundations of black America. Stuckey began this book with a look at the dogma or theory that was written into David Walker's Appeal. He departed from the approach presented by Benjamin Quarles in Black Abolitionists (1969). Quarles reached back to a pivotal secular meeting which took place in the Mother Bethel Church in Philadelphia (1817), while setting the stage for those foundations. Black American leaders faced the American Colonization Society's plan to banish free black Americans to Africa. That crisis was a catalyst for the first convergence of black American leadership. Stuckey presents David Walker's Appeal in an eviscerated state of being. For instance he failed to disclose that David Walker had reprinted a letter written by Bishop Richard Allen. The letter was first printed in Freedom's Journal, the first black American newspaper. No other letter received that kind of attention at this early stage and for decades to follow. Stuckey chose to eviscerate the message of David Walker's Appeal by ignoring the letter that Walker thought to be important. Walker's Appeal also provided an effusive praise of Allen and did not direct praise to any other black American leader. Stuckey ignored that praise.
Stuckey's approach ignores the institutional aspect of the foundations of black America. Richard Allen/Bethel church won a case in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which gave black Americans the right to control their own churches. Stuckey fails to mention the court victory, which allowed for the establishment and control of the institution that enabled a platform for black American self-determination for 150 years.
Stuckey's work contravenes the work of Benjamin Quarles (above) and Charles H. Wesley, who wrote their brilliant works, while connected to historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs). Slave Culture not only misses the appropriate foundations of black America, but ignores 60 years of scholarship that was developed at HBCUs, that is, before the dramatic events of the 1960s reset the ethos of black America and marginalized the role of HBCUs.
What underlies these differences in viewpoint? Stuckey attempted to elevate and enshrine those early black American leaders, who were found to have called "the white man" "the devil." He took a mantra voiced by of Malcolm X (Nation of Islam period) and used it as a criteria for the 'foundations of Black America.' Some historians call this illicit process 'presentism,' although the word has not been soundly accepted in the general lexicon.