“The dart sliced the orchid before the target fell.” This sentence from one of the “novels” collected here by Eileen Tabios represents the impetus of her authorial intent, which in her previous works she said transcends through text. The target is the reader enthused in reading poetry and in patronizing verses infused with brevity yet promising a thought-provoking circumstance in the reading act.
However, Silk Egg, as asserted by the author herself in her notes on the book’s back cover, is not an anthology of verses, nor a garden of words longing for organic unity and critical consideration. It is, more than anything else, a work of prose fictions obviating a reader’s occasional slippages.
The orchids are sliced before the reader could savor the taste of the text, as the estrangement prevailing in the textual presentation makes one realize that reading Tabios’s oeuvres are not the rightful owners of passive and superficial readings. Universal soundings are put to the test.
Is this a novel? You might murmur to yourself while reading the eponymous novel Silk Egg for this preempts to you of what you would witness in the entire book. “A frozen fist.” Yours is the interpretative response. You are urged to think, to imagine the scene, given the colors, textures, and shapes of objects lingering in temporal memory. However, this total cooperation with the novel’s textuality places you in confusion bordering on rage over your own incomprehension.
“Here and there, depending on the shifting light, glass panes revealed thin, gold veins.” Tabios in her literature, needless to say, wiggles the blanket out of each cage so that the mellifluous sounds of birds thirsting for liberty and uncompromised flight are heard, enjoyed, loved. She permits the reader to explore her texts in all ways imaginable. She loosens her bracelet and “watch jade penetrate water, its wake to be defined by moss.”
In this collection of 12 novels contained in a 130-page paperback, all of them were written with strong imageries and expressed in prose without losing calibrated lyricism. All works defy logic and serve as mosaic dramas leading to numerous interpretations and implications. Fragments, one should say sentences, are laid on the blank page and given new tones and schemes. In Dear Cloud, Tabios started asking the question “How can something so soft be dangerous?” and the last line of the seventh and last chapter declared: “I force myself to smile at the cloud.” What is between these sentences is the reader’s obligation, as if the reader is moved by the scarcity of descriptors and settings present in most of the novels and short stories.
In Modern Tulips, the philosopher (referred by Tabios as Slavoj Zizek) asked the reader in the third chapter “Can the flower feel the edge of scissors against its stalk?” We might not know the answer to that intriguing inquiry. But what’s left with us is the stirring moment, looking at a direction where we are headed. It is Gemino Abad who said that to “question” is to embark on a “quest”.
Fiction is not only an exposition of what transpired in a universe, in parallel universes, or in multiverses. Fiction throws a question, like how a pebble is tossed while absconding sunlight’s geometry, then allows the reader to reflect on the pebble’s chiaroscuro. In that moment of introspection, the reader is enabled to create his own narrative, a story he should not bear the burden of explaining its subtexts. Tabios, suffice it to say, is a poet, as well as a fictionist, of regenerations, and not regimentations.
A dialogue between a man and woman. A slice of breath released on the canvas. Wine swiveled in a decanter which light reflects on frescoes. An assortment of velvet red ribbons. There’s a lot more of these “beautiful mysteries” in reading Silk Egg, a compilation of novels that defy measures established by scribes incognizant of the beauty of brevity and the freedom in responding to art. If her poetry reverberates pulchritude in rhythm and restrictiveness, Tabios’s fiction challenges a novel’s typical length, proving that every line, space, and punctuation can speak of a narrative some writers’ unapologetic verbosity cannot provide in clarity and grandeur.