spoilers
So when a handsome warrior barges in with news of her father's dying wish--that she marry this stranger on the spot--Moira knows that duty has her bound.
Soon Moira realizes the folly of her haste: that her father sent no much message; that she has just exchanged vows with her clan's own enemy Ian Cameron of Glencoe. Left behind at the convent, she discovers she carries his child.
This isn't my review after reading the book. No, that's the description on the back of the book.
Wow, just don't hold back.
Go ahead and give us all the highlightts of the book right there. Those would've made some good surprises. I don't think the author understands the purpose of the back cover. It's not to give away the main points of the plot; it's to summarize or give a glimpse enough to get someone interested.
I could go on and on about the insanity and stupidity of such a thing, and about how cheated I feel, but I better save room for the rest of this review, which I'm sure will not be short.
I didn't like that she was 29. That's way too old for the heroine.
"When her father sent her here to the convent at age ten and two she was angry and lonely."
"And now, ten and seven years later, it was too late for any such marriage proposal. She was twenty and nine, far past marriageable age and more importantly far past childbearing age."
"This tall, dignified woman, who showed barely a trace of wrinkles for all her sixty and two years, was like a mother to her."
Ok, I'm already noticing a pattern. I know they spoke like that back then, two and twenty and all that, but u can switch it up every now and then and say the actual age instead of having the reader put it together and add it up in our heads. Just say she's 29 and the old lady is 62. It's ok.
I hate, hate, when the woman is older than the man. I don't think I've ever encountered that before, but this author has tended to do things an author shouldn't ever do. She's 29 and he's 25. While normally that isn't a big age gap, 29 sounds so much older, esp when it's the woman who's older.
I thought it was definitely suspicious that he was so urgent and persistent, saying enemies were on his trail and they had to marry and consummate the marriage that night. Idk if I would have thought that on my own, or if it was because the author had gone ahead and ruined it for me. But Moira shud've realized how odd that sounded. I deduced it was her father and brothers coming after him, and that they weren’t dead at all, because the tale of her father and two brothers dying seemed quite fantastical. &since he didn’t come right out and answer that they were dead I pretty much knew they weren’t. Moira chalked it up to charm that he didn’t directly answer the question. I knew I was in for a dumbass character that wud let things slide right past her when it was right underneath her nose.
The actions that followed that short, non-detailed event that was supposed to be a wedding was absolutely without a doubt the worst unfolding of the act of sex I have ever witnessed, and I’ve read one romance book where the woman was raped, more than once. That gives you an idea of what I thought of their first sexual encounter.
I understand that he had a secret agenda, and that these people were on his tail and were closing in, and they could be heard coming to the convent. But it was crude, base, simple, devoid of any emotion, and just the worst way to have sex. It was borderline rape, except she was a willing partner “because she had given her word” and “it was her duty.” The reason I sat this was worse than the rape I encountered in Christine Feehan’s Hidden Current is that at least one of her characters, the man, had some feelings for her, even though they were obsessive and unhealthy. These two, Ian and Moira, didn’t even know each other, had only met a matter of minutes before and didn’t even have any signs of attraction for the other. And I thought since Ian only wanted her for some reason that didn’t have anything to do with desire, I thought so badly of him it wasn’t even funny. There he had to hurry and have sex with this woman that was 4 years older than him, with a plain face, thin lips, and big eyes. How absolutely disgusting. And I didn’t feel sorry for her in the slightest. She went along with the marriage because she’s a dutiful little idiot, and was a willing participant to sex that looked a little too much like rape for my liking.
It went like this:
Ian looked at her with regretful eyes. “I am sorry.”
With that sincere apology whispered in her ear he raised himself over her, pushed her shift up, and plunged into her. She screamed out from the pain of his forceful entrance and even his gentle words and the soft brush of his lips over hers did little to alleviate her discomfort as he drove in and out of her in rapid strokes.
Anyone that has to say “I’m sorry” before they have sex….that’s when u know something’s wrong. And “plunge?” The only thing u shud plunge into is a pool. And even though he kissed her and said he was sorry “sincerely” didn’t do anything. How can he have sex with someone he doesn’t know, and talk gently to them, and kiss them? That says something about him that I don’t like. It was cold, it was distasteful, like he was performing the actions only because he had to, and doing his duty. It was the worst bit of sex I’d seen.
&right on cue her dad and brothers come storming in, just like I’d expected.
“You fool,” Angus snarled at his daughter. “Do you know who you exchanged vows with and who you welcomed between your legs?” He pointed at the stain of her virgin blood on her night shift.
“Ew” is all I can say. Ian doesn’t let her change, has her purposely walk out with the stained nightshift, and her dad is the 1 to point out the stain. Idk if it’s just me, but that’s a tad uncomfortable to have your dad say something as crass and bold as “welcomed between your legs.” But this author is on the crass side, so I guess it isn’t surprising. And the fool part is rightly deserved on her part. She deserved the name-calling and the yelling and a whole lot worse.
Her father yells at her and Ian says she only obeys him now, and tells her to go to her room until he summons her. And she does. This is after she finds out it’s all a lie and she’s still obeying him. Get a freakin backbone, you twit.
After he leaves she’s doing some figures and thinking about taking a leisurely stroll. I think you’ve got more serious matters to think about, like getting away and leaving the convent. But no, she’s still being the dutiful, meek, obeying wife to a husband who lied about everything. What. A. Dumbass.
He informed her that that she would remain at the convent, loudly proclaiming that she was too old and barren to satisfy her young husband’s needs.
Again, ew. That’s her father making that charming statement. Idk which aspect is more disgusting: the fact that she is indeed old and barren for these standards or the fact that her father is pointing it out.
Ian comes back 2 months later, and 1 of the sisters tells her it’s his friend who’s visiting, so she goes to Mother Superior’s room to find Ian there. Of course. Instead of regret, he’s all smug and amused. The bastard. It made me hate him all the more. And Moira, like the idiot that she is, is admiring his good looks and doesn’t even hide it.
Moira’s pregnant, and instead of just saying so the author drags it out for 12 pages, giving little hints like “her secret” and having Moira be extra hungry and rub her lower back, like she’s trying to keep it a secret. I guess the author forgot she totally gave it away on the back of the book.
Ian insists he’s taking her away with him. Moira “argues” because of her “stubbornness” and under the crappy advice of Mother Superior realizes it’s her duty to obey her husband. I’m seeing another pattern, 1 that sucks.
Wtf? Wtf? Wtf? Ian had married some other woman he was 19. Oh wait, I mean ten and nine. His wife died a year after they married giving birth to a stillborn son. Screw this story. This thing sucks.