2.5.
Losing a child must be the most painful thing a parent can go through, but having one disappear whilst in a foreign country and then having pretty much the whole of the UK, if not the world turn on you and suspect you are guilty of your child's disappearance must be heartbreaking every single day. Yet, I personally believe the McCann's had something to do with Madeleine going missing. I'm not sure what I believe their involvement is, but I just don't see everything adding up. And this book doesn't help squash any of my beliefs (it helps it along in some places.)
Obviously this book was written with the intention of showing Kate's side of the story. Yet in doing so, I feel she casts herself in this angel like glow of doing no wrong. To me it came off as she couldn't take the blame fully, although saying she does. She explains how they'll both feel guilty for the rest of her life for leaving their children unattended in the apartment yet she says it along the lines of 'we could only have known afterwards that this was a bad idea'. How? Nobody should leave their children unattended in their own house, never mind in country you're not familiar with whilst you're having tea. It came off to me as she was saying this as 'Most parents would think this is okay!' I best hope they wouldn't. I'm not a mother, but I wouldn't leave three children under three alone whilst I knock next door for a cup of sugar, even if they were sleeping. It feels like she was trying to distance herself from the blame in a way.
[Couldn't they have got a meal to go and ate in the living room, with all the children in one apartment? Or actually use the creche and resettle their kids down after having something to eat with friends. Surely if they're as tired as she made them out to be they'd settle back down after a short walk back to the hotel room? Hell they could have got the prams they use later to have them sleep in them next to the table but instead the both go out every night and make a habit of leaving their kids alone. All because they were checking on them every 30 to 45 minutes. A child can die in that time. A child can wander off in that time. A child can be taken in that time. It just isn't a responsible thing to do.]
There are two things in this book that make me uncomfortable, and that's Kate talking about her sex life with Gerry and calling Madeleine's genitals 'perfect little [genitals]'. Like everyone else, I was reading this book to see how the disappearance of their daughter effected them, yet I wasn't expecting Kate to talk about how she couldn't touch her husband in a sexual manner. Okay, a little too personal for me. I don't need to know that, it's literally none of my business and has nothing to do with Madeleine going missing. She talks about not being able to do anything pleasurable for two(?) years after losing Madeleine which is understandable, but any reader who is interested in your sex life clearly isn't thinking straight. It was uncomfortable when she brought it up the first time, and even worse when she mentioned that she was able to start enjoying things again, and that she and Gerry began to work on their relationship and getting their sex life back. Cool, good to know, never want to read or think about that again. Seriously, why was it included.
Then we have the way she talks about the possibility of Madeleine being abused. Now, I don't have the book with me so I can't double check this (you can do that) but I believe it's the first time she and Gerry actually talk about the possibility of something dreadful happening to Madeleine together. And these fears would be understandable. But, I feel like you would say 'I'm afraid she's getting r*ped, or abused.' Not how you pictured her "perfect little genitals being torn apart." That's just such a weird phrasing and actually disgusted me.
I also question the actions of Kate and Gerry a lot more as a result of this book. I knew that she had shouted about Madeleine being taken as soon as she noticed she wasn't in any of the rooms, which in itself is strange. My first reaction to someone I know not being where I left them wouldn't be kidnap it would be that they had wandered off. Missing not taken. But the second strange thing that both of the McCanns do is leave their twins. Not only did Kate leave them alone in the apartment complex in order to raise the alarm, but they left them with friends and family whilst they travelled across Europe to raise awareness for Madeleine. Personally, if that was me, I'd have them strapped to my chest the whole time. Just knowing that they're safe with me, and not back in the country where their sibling has gone missing from would make me a whole lot more sense. Yet she explains this as 'travelling would be hard on them.' Okay but your one child is missing and during the first few weeks you admitted to barely being around your two youngest. It's strange. I'd think they'd want the comfort of knowing that two of their children are safe with them.
The whole book just comes off as a plea from Kate to not think she was a bad person. Well she was. Any parent who leaves their child alone for a meal is not a fit parent, but to do this every single night you're on holiday? It's wrong and a crime. And the sad thing is, if this had happened to someone who was less fortunate that Kate and Gerry in the finance department, they would have been charged or arrested for child neglect. Oh the joys of the middle class getting better treatment.
[I also felt like there were more pictures of Gerry and Kate in this book than there were of Madeleine. Maybe she doesn't want to share every picture she has with the world but it feels unbalanced. This book was a 'feel sorry for me' attempt in my personal opinion. With the small sprinkling of help find Madeleine.]