I’ve seen Invincible on the shelves for a few years now but never felt the need to pick it up, even to skim the pages - it looks like a generic superhero book even if the Walking Dead guy wrote it and it’s published by Image. It just looks too much like every superhero book out there - good looking kid in a superhero outfit flying with super strength. Really - is that it? Well I decided to find out for myself today and so I picked it up hoping to be pleasantly surprised - maybe it’s a smart satire on superhero stories, maybe it’s a Superman analogue that takes a different tack to the concept of superheroism, maybe anything! I was prepared to read something subversive and cool, especially after reading Kurt Busiek’s intro where he gushes about the originality of the book.
And then I read the book.
Nope!
Mark Grayson/Invincible is our superhero main character, son of an ordinary woman and a man who happens to be this world’s “Superman”. Mark is your average teen going to an average high school in a nondescript American town, who one day finds out he’s developed superpowers. He can fly, he has super strength, so he follows in his dad’s footsteps and becomes a superhero too.
Mark gets his superhero outfit thanks to his dad’s superhero tailor connection, fights baddies, teams up with another group of young superheroes, goes on an adventure with his dad, fights more baddies, and moons over the pretty redhead who’s seeing someone else and of course wears a super-revealing outfit.
If all of this seems like something you’ve read a hundred times before, it’s because you have. Invincible isn’t a generic superhero comic, it’s THE generic superhero comic. Everything in this book has been done before by Marvel and DC several thousand times already - Robert Kirkman doesn’t add any nuance to it, he just repeats the commercially successful formula but with a character who’s not a brand name (and is instead a bland name).
Kirkman has read a lot of superhero comics and so goes over the same tropes but with a far more breezy attitude. Mark accepts his superpowers and figures out how to use them really quickly, before fighting a supervillain really quickly, meeting up with and accepting other superheroes his age who exist and fight crime in their sleepy little burg (which suddenly seems teeming with bad guys!) really quickly, and solving the crime of missing kids at his high school and the creep behind the local mall bombings really quickly. I appreciate that Kirkman doesn’t feel like dwelling on the mundane character-conflicts that these tropes throw up, especially as we - like him - have read them all before and can do without another rehash, but everything that happens feels so tossed off as to have no impact on the reader.
I mean, if Kirkman doesn’t care about any of these story elements, why should we? If every obstacle Invincible comes across can be overcome so easily, where’s the conflict? The kid’s called Invincible and seems it - so why care? There’s a scene at the end of the book that basically sums up this book’s attitude really well. Mark’s dad “Superman” (I forget the forgettable name he’s given in this book - oh by the way he’s from another planet too, etc. etc.) shows up for dinner after battling aliens from another dimension, an abduction that took place in the background of a panel in the penultimate issue (or chapter, given this is the trade paperback), and he shows up to the dinner table looking disheveled, explaining he had to lead a fight against aliens and only just managed to escape, and so on. All of this stuff that happened to him happens off of the page - we see none of it. And granted, he’s not the main character, but if “Superman” fighting back against alien overlords in another dimension is considered so passé as to not even be worth showing, then it basically reveals Kirkman as not really caring a fig for superhero comics to start with. Seriously, if you care so little about superhero stories that you’d rather tell a generic story within a block of exposition that your superhero character just mutters, then why bother writing a superhero comic if you’re so jaded with what they are?
And if Kirkman is so familiar with the genre, as he clearly is, why doesn’t he do anything different with it? He just retells the same stories again. It’s such a wasted opportunity and baffling that it’s as popular as it is - have the book’s fans not read other superhero books?
Anyways, my instincts were right and reading this book justified them - Invincible is a bland, generic superhero comic, exactly like it looks.