What do you think?
Rate this book
House of Pain
When a young street walker is picked up by an enigmatic older woman, she finds herself launched on an odyssey of pleasure and pain beyond measure. Lost in a night world, thrown to the lusts of her anonymous captors, she must submit to their increasingly bizarre rituals of pain and degradation in order to embrace salvation.
House of Pain is scorched earth erotica, an unprecedented glimpse of living Hell, the torments and raptures of a young woman abandoned to the throes of rage, violence and cruelty which feed the sexual impulse.
For Adult Readers Only.
House of Pain is scorched earth erotica, an unprecedented glimpse of living Hell, the torments and raptures of a young woman abandoned to the throes of rage, violence and cruelty which feed the sexual impulse.
For Adult Readers Only.
- GenresErotica
187 pages, Paperback
First published September 1, 1995
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
January 13, 2026
Hoo boy.
Before we get into the review, let's pause and talk about the crazy back story surrounding the publisher, Creation Books. From what I can tell, they published some really interesting stuff before falling apart in a maze of allegations about Ponzi schemes and con artistry. That's an HBO max doc I would watch!
Anyway, on to the book. I have to admit, I feel a strong urge to qualify or defend my decision to read this book. In an era where we have so many high and low profile cases of sexual slavery perpetuated by men who see themselves as doms but are really power-mad rapists (hello Neil Gaiman!), reading a book like this probably gets me on a list. And I probably deserve to be there. Look, I get it--there's an unresolvable tension when we try to claim eroticized violence against women as sexual liberation while still chugging along in a deeply misogynistic society. This is why so much erotica and a lot of porn makes me feel morally conflicted and why I really feel especially uncomfortable with a lot of what claims to be BDSM lit. (That's my problem and not yours!)
Regardless of my qualifications and hedging...I don't really think this is erotica. At least not for sane people. This is erotica as nihilistic horror, an unremitting journey into darkness, depravity and degradation. There isn't much that makes me genuinely unsettled as a reader of horror and transgressive fiction, but this one got to me. It's intense and disturbing, the type of thing that makes you legitimately feel bad if you have a physical reaction while reading it. The novel therefore succeeds as something more than mere stroke lit; read in context, it pretty clearly fits on a syllabus with Thomas Ligotti in a class exploring nihilistic philosophy in contemporary literature.
The sex and violence is inventive and shocking; really, there's something to be said for anyone who can imagine creative scenarios in the oversexed world of internet porn. In it's raw impact, it reminds me of early industrial music--where Hitler samples meet punishing beats and walls of guitars in a way that makes you kind of feel fucked up for even listening to it. What I'm saying is that this is one hell of a reading experience, a book that constantly challenges your ideas of what "art" and "pornography" can or should be. Wow.
Before we get into the review, let's pause and talk about the crazy back story surrounding the publisher, Creation Books. From what I can tell, they published some really interesting stuff before falling apart in a maze of allegations about Ponzi schemes and con artistry. That's an HBO max doc I would watch!
Anyway, on to the book. I have to admit, I feel a strong urge to qualify or defend my decision to read this book. In an era where we have so many high and low profile cases of sexual slavery perpetuated by men who see themselves as doms but are really power-mad rapists (hello Neil Gaiman!), reading a book like this probably gets me on a list. And I probably deserve to be there. Look, I get it--there's an unresolvable tension when we try to claim eroticized violence against women as sexual liberation while still chugging along in a deeply misogynistic society. This is why so much erotica and a lot of porn makes me feel morally conflicted and why I really feel especially uncomfortable with a lot of what claims to be BDSM lit. (That's my problem and not yours!)
Regardless of my qualifications and hedging...I don't really think this is erotica. At least not for sane people. This is erotica as nihilistic horror, an unremitting journey into darkness, depravity and degradation. There isn't much that makes me genuinely unsettled as a reader of horror and transgressive fiction, but this one got to me. It's intense and disturbing, the type of thing that makes you legitimately feel bad if you have a physical reaction while reading it. The novel therefore succeeds as something more than mere stroke lit; read in context, it pretty clearly fits on a syllabus with Thomas Ligotti in a class exploring nihilistic philosophy in contemporary literature.
The sex and violence is inventive and shocking; really, there's something to be said for anyone who can imagine creative scenarios in the oversexed world of internet porn. In it's raw impact, it reminds me of early industrial music--where Hitler samples meet punishing beats and walls of guitars in a way that makes you kind of feel fucked up for even listening to it. What I'm saying is that this is one hell of a reading experience, a book that constantly challenges your ideas of what "art" and "pornography" can or should be. Wow.
June 23, 2021
Reads like Chuck P. erotic fanfiction. Very competently written though, it definitely feels like some kind of subterranean grunge fever dream. It's erotica and sadomasochism that thinks itself too cool for you. It's a fun read.
January 25, 2008
Pan Pantziarka, House of Pain (Velvet/Creation, 1997)
The publisher's blurb on the back calls House of Pain "scorched earth erotica," and a more accurate definition would be somewhat hard to come by. The book gives us a nameless narrator (by design, of course, cf. "Fight Club") who is kidnapped-- perhaps-- and subjected to various humiliations, etc., which she may or may not enjoy, depending on her mood. As is usual with such things, the degradation builds until it hits a high (low?) at the climax of the book, where the narrator faces the usual question: how badly do I want to keep my identity?
The earlier comparison to Fight Club is more warranted than it may seem at first blush. Pantziarka's writing style matches nicely with what bits of Palahniuk I've been exposed to, and the dark, oppressive atmosphere in House of Pain is certainly a fit with Fincher's directorial oeuvre (though I have a hard, if amusing, time imagining Fincher trying to direct this). Palahniuk works in violence, Pantziarka in sex, and both explore the paradoxical discovery and loss of self in breaking successive taboos therein. This is certainly not a book for the squeamish or the faint of heart, but those who have already been introduced to the nasty side of S&M literature and a concurrent taste for Palahniuk/Jim Thompson/Spillane/etc. will probably find quite a bit to enjoy here.
As a completely irrelevant side note, I much prefer the Creation Books cover. ***
The publisher's blurb on the back calls House of Pain "scorched earth erotica," and a more accurate definition would be somewhat hard to come by. The book gives us a nameless narrator (by design, of course, cf. "Fight Club") who is kidnapped-- perhaps-- and subjected to various humiliations, etc., which she may or may not enjoy, depending on her mood. As is usual with such things, the degradation builds until it hits a high (low?) at the climax of the book, where the narrator faces the usual question: how badly do I want to keep my identity?
The earlier comparison to Fight Club is more warranted than it may seem at first blush. Pantziarka's writing style matches nicely with what bits of Palahniuk I've been exposed to, and the dark, oppressive atmosphere in House of Pain is certainly a fit with Fincher's directorial oeuvre (though I have a hard, if amusing, time imagining Fincher trying to direct this). Palahniuk works in violence, Pantziarka in sex, and both explore the paradoxical discovery and loss of self in breaking successive taboos therein. This is certainly not a book for the squeamish or the faint of heart, but those who have already been introduced to the nasty side of S&M literature and a concurrent taste for Palahniuk/Jim Thompson/Spillane/etc. will probably find quite a bit to enjoy here.
As a completely irrelevant side note, I much prefer the Creation Books cover. ***
May 27, 2007
very very dirty.
May 25, 2012
Thoroughly pornographic!
October 28, 2013
Up there as being one of the most depraved perverse books I have read yet! I didn't hate it, it had it's moments but I definitely won't be recommending it to anyone I know and love!!
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews