Having reread the last chapters several times, which were the most challenging bits of my first reading, I finally feel like having some things to write about this book without, I hope, being easily convicted of being either too enthusiastic or too reserved.
A very long review is in progress.
As a standin:
While LeDoux has been criticized in multiple reviews of being a bit unsure about his audience, I find this book to be immensely educative, even if perhaps didactically not perfectly construed.
LeDoux is clear sighted and one of the world's authorities when it comes to several specific brain circuits, and has established himself over the recent years more and more as someone on the frontiers of emotion and consciousness research.
So he is perfectly placed to give a state of the art overview LeDoux edition.
Further his interest in evolutionary neurobiology allows him to build up the organization step by step from 'simple' organizisms to us humans, adding layers of complexity with the eons.
Principly I believe this how a book of this kind ought to be organized for maximum expressivity and comprehensibility.
His Multi level hierarchical higher order theory of consciousness is nuanced, and while not outright solving the qualia problems, is the finest attempt at pulling consciousness into parts that I have read about. The major quality of it is that it is thoroughly anatomically orientated and gives of the impression of "whatever consciousness is, it works with the anatomical structures LeDoux mentioned very likely in the way LeDoux indicates".
Still, it is a novel theory, and not yet completely fleshed out in every detail, and not in this book anyway.
My biggest criticism is LeDouxs tendency of being too concise. Things are explained in one to five sentences and then just assumed as understood. A decent amount of examples or more piecemeal breakups and repetitions would have made the book around 100 pages longer perhaps, but might have hammered home many points more easily.
The way it has been done, to understand the arguments as a non expert not intimately familiar with the specific terminology of schema, mental models and the like, one has to do exegesis exercises to find the few sentences where LeDoux mentioned precisely what he meant, and sometimes, admittedly this is still not really much to go on.
Maybe this is LeDoux resourcefulness, or simply constraints given by the publisher, but maybe this is also due to the schematic nature of much of the theorizing in the book. Some concepts are relatively vague, in order to be more inclusive I believe, and many relationships aren't yet decisevely understood, and good scientist that LeDoux undoubtedly is, he writes rather less that is nonetheless certain than more that is not.
To boot, here comes my last trouble. While he links many papers he used as additional resources, and sorts them by chapters, a real academic citation as it would have been done in a paper seemed fitting to me, and would have made it easier to use the book for academic purposes. Now to build up on the book, it's a bit of puzzle work, and given the sparse definition of his terms, a direct linkage to the papers where the terms were used in exactly the way he means to use them would have been great, especially since I sense that he could have done it from memory at many parts, freely as he is paraphrasing researchers, papers and their findings.
So, there are formal issues, actually hindering the mainstream appeal, or bluntly, the appeal of this book to a degree, but since the content is so great, and LeDoux is no mean writer, tho digging in is needed, my recommendation is as follows:
If you are interested in the brain, this is a challenging book, but probably a rewarding one.
To get the most use out of the book, I would say you gotta make a good amount of effort
What for? You might find yourself having a cogent model of analyzing the psychology of yourself and others on a general level, as well as a one go ressource for interesting knowledge regarding learning psychology.
As goes the usefulness of his consciousness, and cognition account:
I will try to think more in the way of different abstraction levels of mental models now, but how useful and integrable into every day life it is, I can't say yet. Seeing that I believe it to be true, I think it might proove to be intuitive in some situations tho.