It is important to note that the majority of the themes explored in this book deal with sensitive subject matters. My review, therefore, touches on these topics as well. Many people might find the subject matters of the book & those detailed in my review overwhelming. I would suggest you steer clear of both if this is the case. Please note that from this point forward I will be writing about matters that contain reflections on substance abuse, gore, graphic descriptions of body mutilation, suicide, death of an animal, physical abuse of a minor, parental neglect, dementia, domestic abuse, & others.
Haven has been the person in whom all her father’s original dreams grew to fruition, though she never got the opportunity to hear him say as much. Coming back to Malice House after the passing of her famed author-father, Amory Marbury, Haven finds herself at an impasse. Does she believe that the fantom corpse of a despicably grotesque crab is living under the bed or was her father elapsing into paranoid delusion brought on by his deteriorating mental state as a consequence of his Dementia?
Is one able to fully grasp the absurdity of the physical form of the demons that plague us or do these beings necessitate a place in reality for us to believe them to be true?
I have a very low opinion of this book because I did not enjoy the story. The following review will detail my reasons for not enjoying a story that I thought was going to be something that it was not. I believe, wholeheartedly, that this book requires the enjoyment of a niche reader for, the subject matter succumbs to the Fantasy genre with greater gusto than I was led to believe, or more sore, with greater gusto than I chose to acknowledge as a probability.
Objectively, this story would have done well had it been described as a Dark Fantasy—something that resides in the Magical Realism leaflets of literature. Presenting this book as being a clean-cut Horror stripped it of its ability to find its reader. There are, certainly, aspects of the genre that are absurdly morose & decadently incomprehensible. Monsters that come to life due to a bizarre family curse dating back into a lineage, unexplored; wherein a sole member of said family has discovered her powers of striking an image from the page transforming it into reality & in which an entire town acknowledges this superhuman ability as being a real occurrence; falters awkwardly within the Horror genre in which it has been set.
The sheer number of times I questioned what the intent was behind this story was enumerable. I continue to question the reasons for which any of what was done in this book took place.
Did Haven have to be a secretive idiot who walked into darkened houses in search of what she assumed was a violent predator? No, she did not.
Did there need to be a sidekick sister character who brought nothing to the plot due to her lack of desire to pose relevant & insightful questions? No, there did not.
Did there need to be repeated scenes of characters slurping their lips raw from hard liquor sprints? No, there did not.
In Haven the reader is presented with a character who lacks a great deal of self-awareness & is incredibly inauthentic. There are rarely characters whose attempts at distinguishing themselves from others read as well-structured in a plot that writes them as being the exact character they seek to revoke.
Haven is a girl who is not like other girls, she’s not like anyone ever on this planet to date; so quirky & undone in the very best haphazard ways, Haven wanders through life unafraid of anything. She can watch scary movies & not feel fear, she can draw gruesome pictures because she likes ‘dark’ art—unlike anyone else ever in the history of humankind—& she can mosey at her leisure unharmed because a man is behind the scenes protecting her.
What truly drives home the point that Shepard is trying to highlight concerning Haven is that she will act & do things that no one in their right mind would do but, she does them because she isn’t in her right mind, according to non-fiction standards.
Haven has a special ability, one that was passed down to her through some inconsequential genetic mutation, that allows her family to bring to life the things that they do in art. At face value, this is a very intriguing concept & I highlight, again, that it would fit well into the Fantasy genre. What causes a rift within this logic is that Haven is not a biological descendant of her father’s lineage at all, she is a drawing brought to life.
Could one assume that because Haven has a deep disconnect with naturally felt human emotion, her time being drawn by Amory led her to be the character we saw ramble on in the pages of this book? Can one attribute her lack of connection in the human-born world to the reasons for which she made decisions that were both horrifically unsafe as well as being dense?
When Haven first meets Kylie she is quick to trust her—she is quick to trust everyone though she boasts of being able to read the room & withholding her seal of approval—why is that? The dialogue that Kylie is given reeks of a lack of depth. This is a secondary character who was attempting to make their way into the primary spot but was not granted enough dimensionality to merit further screen time.
Who in their right mind would think that a couple, meagre, hundred dollars would be the selling price for memorabilia from an internationally prized & award-winning author? This is an incredible lowball & the author sees fit to never revisit this. Are we to read into Kylie’s Crypto scheme that she is simply scamming her fellow man for the thrill of pulling the wool over their eyes or because she doesn’t understand the field in which she is attempting to make money?
What would lead Haven to trust Kylie? This is a person who is working in a bookstore whose theme is her father’s work yet, her singular brush-off, declaring she’s not a fan, is enough to satiate Haven. Why? Kylie is constantly out of her depth but is portrayed as a decent, diligent, person. She goes so far as to claim that the mutilations caused to Dahlia by her murderer had to have been committed while she was alive because there was blood on her body. That’s factually incorrect.
Correlated to the fact that Dahlia’s mutilations took place in quick succession one would need to study bruising & injury on her body to deduce whether or not one or both of her heels were snipped or if the claw reached for her wrists first; did she fall, resulting in her head being decapitated first? Also, given the rapidity of the events, it is not implausible to deduce that the body would bleed—as it does—within the short period in which these actions were taking place. This may appear to be a generally benign argument to make but, I present it to highlight that Kylie, along with many other people in this book, made unsubstantiated claims & no one questioned anything that was said.
Another example of this is Rafe giving Haven a useless response when she asks him how he got access to her property when the gate was locked. We later learn that it is possible to jump the fence but Haven never questions this answer. She has just been confirmed that people have casual access to her home, where she knows others have been attempting to enter & disregards this fact because she has a crush on the man with whom she’s talking.
I acknowledge a personal difficulty in the actions that are required of Haven to move this plot forward. Generally speaking, I find it inconceivable when a female character decides to pursue dangerous decisions without ever informing at least one other person of their whereabouts. This certainly happens in real life, which is probably why I have such a difficult time reading about it in fiction. When Haven is snipped by Pinchy she refuses to involve any first responders. Instead, she calls Kylie & is calmed by Kylie’s decision not to ask questions about anything. During this scene, Haven bemoans Baker, her ex-partner because he would ask her pertinent questions when or if she called for help. This is perhaps a hot take but, should someone be calling you with an emergency you’re going to want to know where they are & what happened—any details are helpful—so that you are prepared for what you are about to face & subsequently can be as helpful as possible.
The unreliability of Haven throughout the entire plot left me eagerly awaiting her demise. To my great humour, we read as she drives to a darkened house in the middle of the night where she assumes Kylie might be kept against her will.
There is a distinct monologue that transpires in which Haven declares that she couldn’t possibly call the police & must go into the house alone. This is stupid. I understand that a great number of people have had (shall we say) less than stellar experiences with judicial bodies as a whole but, wandering into a house where you think your friend is being held against their will & may probably be subjected to physical violence, on your own, is beyond moronic. This truly adds nothing to the plot, even though everyone conveniently ignores the existence of forensic science—or basic biology, if you will—the characters in this book always choose the road that is the most taxing.
Haven’s reason for not involving the police stems from her experience with them in the past; having been charged with domestic abuse against Baker. As someone who thrives off the horrific, Haven would have known that her motive of violence, though untrue, would have cushioned her in this instance.
Given that she was previously regarded as a domestic abuser against a male & that Kylie is someone who had DNA evidence from another person entirely & that Orion would not (save the fingerprints where she checked for a pulse) have her DNA on his body, there is no reason not to reach out for help, in this case.
Had Shepard pursued the original presentation of Haven’s character I would have appreciated her gusto. At the beginning of the story, Haven explores her father’s house without any fear. I suppose one might attribute her lack of fear while consuming Horror films to be due to her belief that those things, could not happen to her; though she acknowledges that the films succeed in the reality behind the outlandish.
Throughout much of the first part of the book, Haven is strong-willed & smart. She wants to believe in the best of those around her but quickly loses her cool when she decides to hate a group of people because they don’t adore her illustrations. Then we see her invite a strange man, Rafe, into her home because he smells good. I digress.
The narrative grows to showcase inconsistencies which might be read as shifts in the characters’ presentation & stature in reality but, they are also faults, nonetheless. For example, the entire novel states that Amory had dementia but while Haven is reading his journals, he writes about being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s Disease.
Haven is said to be using her laptop to access Kylie’s ‘Find My Phone’ app but, it’s Kylie’s laptop that she is using. Another example is Haven telling the reader (herself) that she doesn’t need money so much as to trust the Ink Drinkers but, she is quick to trust a Crypto scheme which she knows nothing about.
I am confident that many readers will adore this book. I know that the story that has been presented will wiggle its way into the minds of those who are easy-going & eager to consume any book that might snuggle into the Horror genre. My personal preference for stories in this genre sees me longing to find the character who was unafraid while roaming the attic at night or who was experiencing lapses in time so suddenly after the passing of their parent.
I enjoy when stories have a basis in the non-fictional; this is very much a Fantasy with heavy undertones of Magical Realism that riddles in aspects of specific fear for those who might long to see the monsters that crept through their rooms at night, brought to life by the colourful words of an author.
Thank you to NetGalley, Hyperion Avenue, & Megan Shepherd for the free copy of this book in exchange for an honest review!