Triple Cross is Peter Lance’s third investigative book on the intelligence failures that allowed the terrorists acts of September 11, 2001, to happen. ( Interestingly, I largely finished the book on the 20th anniversary of the attack on the Wold Trade Center and the Pentagon.) With each book, Lance has learned more and more about the many complications and convoluted connections that allowed Sept. 11 to happen, and this third volume is probably the most complex, though I have not read Lance’s prior two books.
One key point that emerges is that the FBI—which Lance has cast as the most culpable of all of the government agencies involved—was never set up to do intelligence work, nor track terrorists, nor really try to prevent crime, though I have read of some successes in the preventive area recently. But back in the 1990s, it appears that the agents didn’t have the training or instincts to “connect the dots” as Lance says over and over. But other government entities clearly did, such as the military, which had a unit that could run immense computer algorithms, and which did come up with a map of the connections between various suspected terrorists and their contacts. But not only did this work get destroyed by some sort of despicable CYA act by higher-ups, the members of the unit that did the work and later revealed it were undermined and persecuted by their own agencies.
One of what I suspect is Lance’s apparent lack of legal training. While it is hard to parse all of his allegations, it is much easier to make connections between people whose names and crimes you now know than to be starting with a few names and no actionable crimes against them. Clearly, at some point Ali Mohamed should have been looked at more closely, and the evidence from the Philippine law enforcement officers taken seriously. But several of the things Lance makes hay about—a mailbox, for example—are things that at the time may have not appeared worth pursuing because there was nothing they could do with the information.
The book is difficult to read because it pursues so many lines of inquiry and seeming conspiracies within various agencies to suppress evidence or information in order to protect the reputations and careers of those involved. The DOJ attorneys and the one dirty cop are particularly interesting. I would like to know more about what happened to them and how some of these decisions were made “off stage,” so to speak. That would make for an interesting fourth book.