You know the baseline broadsheet magazine column – humorous mishaps the writer has undergone this week, local bickerings, the ongoing arguments with a long-suffering spouse? Now, imagine one of those that's worth reading. A feat to rival the wildest cosmic imaginings of Olaf Stapledon or William Hope Hodgson, I know. But you're not done yet: imagine one whose collected edition would still be worth reading, in another country, decades hence. The improbable proof of this wild premise is a battered paperback I've just finished. Wry, witty and self-deprecating in exactly the way I know some people would find unbearably smug, it's determinedly minor work, and yet it still entertains, still offers solace and even wisdom in a world where all the old certainties which underpinned it have, for better and worse, evaporated like dew. Granted, the parallel to columns as we know them isn't exact: the pieces are longer, and more openly fictionalised, meaning they arguably approach the status of sketches or even oblique short stories. But to approach them in that spirit might be a disappointment when they're so thoroughly and perfectly riffs on whatever took Thurber's fancy as a deadline neared.
(Yes, I'm pretty sure I've said something along similar lines before – maybe for a collection of Chesterton's journalism, or Ransome's? But fuck it, if you can't recycle material when writing about columnists, where can you?)