When I read Frederick Philip Grove's 1925 novel Settlers of the Marsh for grade eleven English in the fall of 1983 (when we were, except of course for the standard Shakespeare play we read every year, focussing almost exclusively on both recent and not so recent Canadian literature), the general consensus at that time was still and heavily so that the author, that Frederick Philip Grove was of Swedish background and that his Settlers of the Marsh (as well as many of his novels) should therefore be regarded as not only a historical novel about the experiences of new Canadian immigrants, about Canadian pioneers in general, of their hopes, their passions and anxieties, their triumphs and tragedies, as well as that abuse, brutality and even murder could indeed also often be part and parcel to the immigrant experience, but also and in particular that Settlers of the Marsh with its focus on specifically recent Swedish immigrants to Canada seemingly served as a document of Frederick Phillip Grove's own experiences as a recent arrival from Sweden and the lives of his fellow compatriots. However, considering that it has now been pretty well proven without a doubt that Frederick Philip Grove was NOT of Swedish but of German ethnicity and that he very deliberately hid much of his background not only due to the unfortunate proliferation of major anti-German attitudes and sentiment during and post WWI but also and rather sadly due to the nefarious and nasty fact and truth that Grove was in fact a bigamist who had simply deserted his first wife in Kentucky and then proceeded to move to Manitoba where he married a young schoolteacher whilst still being legally wedded to his deserted first wife Elsa, much of what was considered possible historical background and reality in Settlers of the marsh, or more to the point what we had been taught and told were likely the author's own immigration experiences (or at least heavily based on them) should really be taken with majorly huge grain of salt.
Now with regard to the novel itself, Settlers of the Marsh is probably Frederick Philip Grove's (whose original German surname appears to have been Greve) most well-known and lastingly famous work of fiction. It is an easily read, often frenetic in pace, naturalistic, generally brutally honest, direct and painfully realistic tale of pioneer hopes, dreams and disappointments as well as how personal wishes and strivings also can so easily be destroyed or be rendered into lamentable remains of sad shreds of said desires by brutality, sexual abuse and deliberate terror (including in the marriage bed), spun into a web of pain, disappointment and suffering (which also includes the threat and reality of murder and mayhem). But that all having been said, while I can and do to a certain extent both much cheer and laud that Frederick Philip Grove so painfully and with intensity of feeling portrays that and how the main fault especially regarding sexual abuse and brutality rests and lies for the most part with the perpetrators (and even if said perpetrator, such as is the case with Ellen's family, is the husband, is Ellen's own father, Grove thankfully never shies away from depicting and presenting him as an absolute monster who continuously torments and relentlessly tortures his wife and daughter), there is still (in my opinion) within the pages of Settlers of the Marsh and even if this might indeed and obviously also be a sign of the times, much too much below the surface blaming and chastisement of women present, especially with regard to main protagonist Niels, who might indeed be naive but whose killing of his promiscuous wife even though he obviously should have been more than well aware of the fact that he was indeed marrying the local prostitute has always made me cringe a bit with regard to how emotionless the depiction of the murder is presented and indeed how Niels is kind of given a bit too much authorial support and not even remotely enough condemnation and criticism. And well, the ending of Settlers of the Marsh, with Ellen basically and seemingly taking much of the blame for what has transpired onto herself, blaming herself for not accepting Niels' hand in marriage due to her own traumatic life experiences and that she had promised her mother that she would not submit herself to any man, personally, I do find all of this rather troubling to say the least (and now that I am a bit more aware of Frederick Philip Grove's personal background, especially his peccadilloes with regard to the callous abandonment of his first wife, it certainly does make me wonder even with my appreciation of Settlers of the Marsh as a realistic and naturalistic, but also authentic and evocative story of pain, sadness and ultimate forgiveness, whether the author, whether Grove does or perhaps more to the point whether he did in fact also tend to at least partially blame women for the abuse they have endured or still do endure through and from the men in their lives and if he also blamed his first wife for her abandonment by him).