Ross Inman has successfully written a book that a layperson can actually read. But I wish chapters 7-10 were sold as a standalone pamphlet, and that there was an audiobook, but those are my only negative comments.
When I was fourteen, this was the book I needed, and later when in college and people were saying "Why are you reading Augustine" or "What kind of job will that get you," this is the book I needed. Almost everything he said of philosophy would also stand as an apologetic for art, writing, theology, etc.
Inman pleads, argues, and shows that philosophy is practical. He begins with "wonder" and ends with an example of philosophy transforming a life, namely, Augustine of Hippo.
He gives a diagnosis for modern man, and then proposes Christian Philosophy as a remedy.
He encourages the reader to
1. Commit to an existential map shaped by the Christian story.
2. Orient your life around a Christian existential map.
3. Engage in grace-empowered, truth-directed practices
One section of interest to me was the intellectual virtues he listed:
1. Carefully attend to their own beliefs, the reasons that support those beliefs, and the process by which those beliefs were formed (intellectual care and attentiveness)
2. They strive to be aware of, own, and correct for their intellectual limitations and blind spots (intellectual humility)
3. They avoid playing fast and loose with the truth for the sake of personal gain (intellectual honesty)
4. They transcend their own perspectives by taking the merits of others for you seriously (intellectual open-mindedness)
5. They think as well of others intelligence and intellectual character as a reasonably can (intellectual charity)
6. They hold on to their well-supported beliefs unless given good reasons for revising them (intellectual firmness)
7. And they continue to uphold their well-supported beliefs in the face of great risk and loss, such as loss of social status (intellectual courage)
He recommends several spiritual exercises. I am hesitant to accept the work of Dallas Willard, but it would stop provoking, nonetheless.
1. Solitude and silence
2. Self-examination and meditation
3. Spiritual friendship
4. Existential rest
Then he delves into practicality questions as he calls them. He refutes our lurking assumptions.
How in the world is philosophy even remotely practical?
He refutes the assumption that "if an activity or pursuit is valuable, it's valuable only for the sake of something else"
"If I carry out action A (getting a job) for the sake of some good B (acquiring money), and if I carry out B for the sake of C (paying rent), and if I carry out C for the sake of D (not getting evicted), and so on indefinitely without ever reaching a goal worth valuing for its own sake, then one would be right to question whether A, B, C, or D are even instrumentally valuable in the first place. As with the stepping stones, unless he's valuable pursuits ultimately bring us to an end that is good for its own sake and not pursued for the sake of anything else, we might begin to doubt whether A--D are ultimately good for anything. If this little argument is right (and I encourage you to try it on and see whether it fits), then there must be some activities or pursuits that are intrinsically valuable (Good for their own sake) and who's merits are not found in some good beyond them; such activities and ends are their own reward, we might say."
The book overall was a pleasure to read, even the footnotes were slim and enjoyable.
Highly recommend for the the Christian that doesn't understand or believe that philosophy is a good way of life.
"What are you waiting for?"
Age 12+
(Typed on phone, sorry)
Postscript: I think "The Love of Wisdom" by Cowan and Spiegel would be a good follow-up read. I think I am going to read "Jesus the Great Philosopher" by Jonathan Pennington to round out my thoughts on this topic as well.
Grace and peace,
B. Grizenko