In The Celtic Way of Evangelism, Hunter discusses two primary topics: How St. Patrick (and those who joined him) evangelized the "barbarian" people of Ireland in the 400s C.E., "saving Christianity in the West," and how their methods and mindset are applicable to our post-Christian culture today.
Several key insights I pulled from the book were:
1) Instead of following the Roman model of evangelization, which necessitated "civilizing" first and then adoption of Roman Christian customs second, the Celtic Christian movement took the time to understand and befriend the people before sharing their message (5). They indigenized their presentation and practice of the faith (30).
"Biblical revelation was primary, but understanding the people's cultural and historical context helped them to know what in Scripture to feature first, and how to 'translate' it for the people" (72). They believed that Jesus comes to all people "'not to destroy, but to fulfill' their religious tradition" (88).
This ancient Chinese poem sums up the Celtic method well: Go to the people / Live among them / Learn from them / Love them / Start with what they know / Build on what they have (129).
2) The Celtic Christian movement emphasized personal transformation in the context of a Christian community. Their communities allowed outsiders to belong before they believed (18). They showed genuine "hospitality in ministry with seekers, visitors, refugees, and other guests" (41). It was the highest priority in their monastic communities. The Roman model was "Presentation - Decision - Fellowship" while the Celtic model was "Fellowship - Ministry and conversation - Belief, invitation to commitment (43).
3) They didn't shy away from addressing the problems of the "excluded middle," the day-to-day problems and situations of people (19).
4) They practiced contemplative prayer throughout their day that kept their hearts and minds continually open to the Triune God (21).
5) "Celtic evangelism took people's 'right brains' seriously; it made the gospel's meaning vivid, engaged people's emotions and energized their response by engaging their imaginations" (38). "They excelled at expressing their faith in symbols, metaphors and images, both visual and poetic" (67). They didn't just use their sense of hearing, as many Protestants do today; they realized that "God can use all five senses to 'speak to people" (69).
6) In contrast to the Roman church which, at the time, largely emphasized the transcendence of God, Celtic Christianity emphasized the immanence of the triune God as our "Companion in this life and the next" (77).
7) Creation was held in high regard in Celtic Christianity. To them, nature reflected its divine creator and aided them in connecting with the Triune God (82). "In their experience, the veil between earth and heaven was thin—if you viewed creation as sacramental" (77). "We occasionally observe a recovery of the Celtic love for nature in Christian communities, but (tragically, for our witness with 'tree huggers') more often outside Christian communities" (128).
8) Celtic Christianity held an optimism towards human nature. "For Augustine, Jesus Christ saves us by rescuing us from sin and the consequences of the Fall. For the Celtic apostles, Jesus Christ comes to restore our humanity and to complete his good creation" (85). The Celtic movement "suggests that it is often more effective to begin with people at the point of their goodness, however latent, than to initially engage people as sinners" (86).
9) "Overall, Roman-like exclusionary attitudes and practices are more epidemic in churches today than almost anyone recognizes . . . There are many types of people that most 'inclusive' churches never really invite or make room for. We can say of most churches that Laotian-speaking people; preliterate people; addictive people; cohabitating people; bikers; divorced people; ex-prisoners; people with 'reputations'; people with anger issues; people who 'are not nice'; pedophiles; people who are blind, deaf, mentally disabled, or mentally ill; post-high school youth; couples without children; single mature men; single mature women; celebrities; wealthy people; famous people; people in power positions; and many others need not apply" (92).
"Establishment Christian leaders still take a dim view of pastors and churches who befriend pagans, sinners, and lost people, and who make apostolic outreach a church's priority. Establishment Christianity seems always to expect its people, pastors, and bishops to care for, and fraternize with, church people" (101).
10) Hunter makes this point (maybe one of the most profound and profoundly stated in the book): "The faith that is in many church attendees is as much American folk religion as Christianity. Their focus tends to be consumerist ('What is in it for me?'), moralistic ('Live by the rules!'), therapeutic ('I want peace of mind and happiness') Deism.
As I overhear God's people talk, Christianity is almost reduced to accepting Christ as your Savior so you can go to heaven when you die, and between now and then you attend church, have a daily devotional, live a clean life, and 'let' God meet your needs and attain your goals.
There may be more right than wrong in that reduction of the faith, but it is a form of Christianity with some of the heart removed, more of the mind, and most of the vertebrae. It is not a version of the Christian faith that has a fair chance of changing the world or its devotees. No ancient martyrs would have been fed to the lions if their faith has been reduced to that . . .
The piety occupying most pews produces the spiritual equivalent of scrub pines but not redwoods. Such faith lacks deep roots that weather storms, that produce reproductive Christians who live in faith, hope, and love, who become saints engaging in ministry, working for peace and justice, and reaching lost people" (94).
11) "In life's ultimate paradox, as we become more like Christ—living by the will of God, reflecting the love of God—we become more like the people we were born to be and have really always wanted to be" (98). "As C.S. Lewis reminds us, 'The church exists for nothing else but to draw men into Christ, to make them little Christs. If they are not doing that, all the cathedrals, clergy, missions, even the Bible itself, are simply a waste of time. God became man for no other purpose. It is even doubtful, you know, whether the whole universe was created for any other purpose'" (100).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
These are powerful observations which will continue to mold my understanding of what it means to be a Christian in the context of our world today! The two downsides I observed with the book is my sense that the book could have been organized into clearer sections and that Hunter's writing (apart from a few small portions) was not profoud writing in a literary sense. The information in the book was profound, but I thought it could have been communicated with more eloquent language.