What do you think?
Rate this book


216 pages, Paperback
First published April 1, 2011
Rufus and Alex used to speak IKEA with each other, a language redolent with umlauts and nursery-rhyme rhythms. Drömma. Blinka. Sultan Blunda! It was lingonberry of another tongue -- tart, sexy even, in a birch-veneer kind of way. Their private lingua franca.
Patel made his Lapsang souchong-smoked duck breast with pomegranate sauce. Kim made dolmades using grape leaves from his own garden. Then there was Karlheinz’s oyster foam-filled agnolotti, Trevor’s quail stuffed with raisins and quinoa, and Stefan’s saffron risotto with truffle oil and mascarpone. Marcus’s silky black cod with Pernod mole sauce (70 percent pure, fair-trade cocoa) filled the role of dessert.
Forget bad-boy musicians or beautiful vampires. I'm talking about the kind of man who turns his dirty dishes over and, when both sides are used, throws them out in a way that is both ceremonial and completely nonchalant, and has you utterly, utterly convinced that this is a "philosophy". A man who adds not one but three umlauts to his name for a devastating Teutonic effect. I'm talking about a terrifying and destructive charisma.
The point of art, Miss Subramamium, is in not meeting expectations. Ha! Yes, that is the point! I surprise even myself with this revelation. So Georgia, in “not meeting expectations,” is, in fact, at the top of her class. Art, and here I include dance, music, film, and belle lettres, is perhaps the only human activity where not meeting expectations corresponds with success, not failure.
"If you meet expectations, you're doing the expected, right? You're toeing the line. If you meet expectations, you're doing what you're expected to do, or what success is considered. But shouldn't you be trying to do something else? I'd rather go down in flames, quite frankly, than have a nice little book. I'd rather go down screaming in flames. You can quote me on that."
But here the victims are people of means, not the already downtrodden, so the notion that they're being either cosmically punished or held up as "a warning to us all?" (Vancouver Sun editorial, October 16, 2006) is debated in the mainstream media by pundits with straight faces.Way back when in my GR career, I was part of a group called 'Bookish' that sadly disbanded some time ago. What I didn't realize then was how much the group focused on newly published Canadian lit, which is why I still have various 2011-2013 Canadian lit hanging around my shelves, evidence of a more receptive, albeit less self-aware taste, one of which is this. Much as I am wary of the phrase "hasn't aged well", I have to bring it out now because these stories all read like little more than various collated rants ripped from a blog posts and plumped up into wannabe satires that come off less scathing and more rebel without a cause. Having recently finished Everett's Erasure, I know that I'm still receptive to satire when done well. In contrast, what is collected here seems to operate on the base assumption that protesters and terrorists function purely out of bureaucratic frustration, which makes for characterization that can't make up for the shoddy satire, as the author seems to be bent on doing nothing more than offending absolutely everybody.
It was the year the enterprising homeless constructed ad hoc villages of tidy huts from purloined election signs. The colorful little houses lined the cut at both ends of the Terminal Street Bridge. The design world took notice, with the San Francisco-based architectural magazine Dwell running a photo essay with text by Toronto's latest public intellectual. "These intelligent spaces represent design that fully integrates the residents' ideals and values with their needs. Like the yurt and the Quonset hut, the 'signage-home' or 'Sigho' will no doubt evolve well beyond its origins, co-opted by those with a discerning eye for the frugality and transportality of the design." He supplied the requisite Walter Benjamin quote from "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" and ended with some McLuhanesque wordplay.That quote up there represents the best of what I imagine Gartner was attempting to get at. The best satire is one that takes the existing absurdity of a situation with an underlying menace and extending it juuuust enough for people who don't already obsess over such diabolical implications sit up and stare. The short story that contained it, 'Once, We were Swedes' was probably the strongest for it, but honestly, I couldn't find any sort of concept, whether character or driving analysis of a socioeconomic construct, to attach myself to during all of the narratives, resulting in me being hurled through various early 21st century laden references with nary a culminating resolution in sight. I found myself thinking of After the Apocalypse and, to a lesser extent, I Am an Executioner: Love Stories, all of them weirdly confabulated short stories, yet 'Executioner' pulls off a je ne sais quois in enough to leave both sci fi wonderings and non-holistic parodyings in the dust. There are certain remarks I could make, but as they're all negative, I feel leaving it at that sufficient to my reviewing purposes.
We found it both interesting and disturbing that people's attitudes towards women and their bodies had changed so little since the days of Nebuchadnezzar II.