I have to admit, to a degree I was looking to read a book that trashed the internet, particularly one that offered critiques of the effects of socializing on it.
But this ain't that book.
However, what it is is actually not too bad, and it did satisfy the Luddite strain in me. It takes a macro/large event-scale approach rather than focusing on the personal-level consequences of what Davidow calls "overconnectivity," which in a nutshell is the author's contention that overly pervasive and complex systems such as the internet can aid, abet and worsen the severity of events, and leave a lot of unprepared people, who have not adjusted to the new order, reeling in its wake. The internet, for all its glories, more rapidly spreads and worsens pain in a globally connected world. Mainly the book looks at how the internet has worsened the fallout of various financial crises, including the subprime mortgage crisis in which we are still deeply mired (2 million homes expected to be repo'd in 2011; and mine might be one of them). Davidow's compact explanation of the history and causes of the subprime mortgage crisis is probably the best I've ever read. He pretty much nails it in about 3 pages.
What the book really seems to be, oftentimes, is a critique of the cynically immoral deregulated business practices afoot in the global economy, more than it is a critique of the internet. The internet can be used as a tool by elites to manipulate and ruin the rest of us, and accelerate the bilking process. In a sense, the net is not the explosion itself, but the metaphorical gasoline that can make the conflagration far worse.
I had written a lot of thoughts about this book as I went along, but decided to just pen a pithy assessment. I think Davidow's tome is supposed to be like one of those Malcolm Gladwell books, just not as good. And it can get tedious at times, especially when it rehashes things like the history of the internet, and Davidow's own folksy anecdotes about his times as a Silicon Valley executive. Although there is an amusing story about he and colleagues sitting around a table in the early 70s pondering future uses of computer technology--but failing to see big-picture drawbacks like the swift collapses of wired financial institutions, etc.--and envisioning instead apps such as recipe databases for housewives. He admits it was sexist and a naive sign of those times.
Speaking about semiconductors, he writes. "We Intel engineers believed our tiny device would improve the world, but we failed to understand how it would transform it."
The book is a good primer to those wanting to ponder the downside of technologies that are touted as panaceas or quality of life enhancers.