What do you think?
Rate this book


Audiobook
First published October 3, 2023
FEMINISM = A HISTORY OF UNNATURAL WOMEN
Feminism is treated as a flight from nature. Ideology is history turned into nature. To fight against inequalities is to hear how they are justified. Justifications become tired. And so we become tired too.
Let me affirm that being a feminist killjoy can be how we survive. Reclaiming the feminist killjoy sounds empowering and energising. And it can be. Reclaiming that figure sounds tiring, difficult, and painful. And it can be. The feminist killjoy teaches us that these are not two different stories of feminism, one about empowerment and self-actualisation, energy and hope, the other about pain, exhaustion, and difficulty, but two sides of the same story. We are empowered and energised not by keeping our distance from what is painful, but by working through it, acquiring a clearer, sharper sense of who we are and of the world we want. Killing joy is a world-making project.
The effort to protect someone from unhappiness does not lead to happiness. Audre Lorde's work helps us to understand why. Lorde suggests, 'Looking on the bright side of things is a euphemism used for obscuring certain realities of life, the open consideration of which might prove threatening or dangerous to the status quo.' She moves from this observation to a wider critique of happiness as an obscurant: 'Let us seek "joy" rather than real food and clean air and a saner future on a liveable earth! As if happiness alone can protect us from the results of profit-madness.'
When you know that to say no is to be judged as antisocial, it is hard to say no. To say no, no to the harasser, but also no to the structure that enables the harasser, requires a refusal to be what we are told is a right or good way to be. But that you say no also means you become conscious of how you were taught.
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST = SURVIVAL OF THOSE WHO FIT
[...] An institution, too, is shaped by processes of selection. It might appear as if the moment of selection is accidental; that this person or that person just happens to fit the requirements, the way this stone just happens to be the same size as that hole in a wall. Once a building has been built, once it has taken form, more or less, some more than others will fit the requirements. The same people will keep having the qualities referenced as being necessary to fill the vacancy when the vacancy was created with them in mind. It can then appear as if some people just happen to fit, rather than they fit because of how the structure was built.
The appearance is turned into an argument. When you point out the structure, they reply it was an accident: we are here now because we just happened to meet the requirements. This is how a structure can disappear by accident.
It is too easy to be critical of sexism or racism, of power or harassment, in general. [...] To be a killjoy activist is to learn what happens when you try to address problems 'closer to home'. Sometimes action is not taken because there is a refusal to hear about problems here. In my introduction to the killjoy, I noted that we need to snap a bond when it is damaging or diminishing. We might need to snap a bond to institutions to prevent other people being damaged by them.