This year, I've been interested in working with tarot cards in creative ways, which is why I picked up Joan Bunning's Learning Tarot Spreads. I've been reading tarot books that were more theory and while I enjoy that, I like to be given prompts or exercises to try.
This is a very slim book that is both commendable and sometimes boring in how it catalogues tarot spreads. This is designed like a workbook in a way as there are exercises to do after every "lesson", but the exercises weren't particularly calling to me. On the design of the book, I think the structure could have been better organized. I kept having to flip back and forth between the appendixes and lessons. I didn't immediately understand how the book was organized until I sat down with it for a few times. This isn't a bad thing, but if the publisher wants to put out introductory books, a consideration into the presentation of the lay-out helps a lot with this.
While reading that position or shape can alter the meaning of a tarot spread wasn’t a newsflash for me, the type of cataloguing I did enjoy was Bunning's identification of 8 subjects and 24 qualities that can be used in a tarot spread, something she came up with it after analyzing hundreds of spreads to find universal commonalities. (Qualities are the factors surrounding a subject.)
Perhaps too introductory for where I'm at, but also not the most accessible read for new beginners. It is factually true what Benning states, but I imagine if I was a new reader, I'd feel a little lost about her talking about positions and subjects, which is a bit more of a dry, if accurate explanation.
Many of the tarot shapes were also shapes that I had already worked with in my own practice, so I didn't feel creatively inspired, as I had hoped.
The back of the book calls this "an essential encyclopedia of tarot spreads", but there is no actual section dedicated to common tarot spreads. It would have been great to show the most common ones like Celtic Cross, and even common spreads by popular tarot figures. Note: Celtic Cross is mentioned but it’s not discussed with context or introduced with anything besides it’s a popular spread.
What comes to mind is Benebell Wen's Holistic Tarot. It's not just about tarot spreads, but its section on tarot spreads included common spreads as well as her own spreads; there's more Golden Dawn, Kabbalah influences involved. Bunning's tarot spreads is stripped of tarot tradition, and in a sense this can be erasure, and a loss. In another sense, it could help for folks to focus.
In the tarot communities that I am in, there is a love for creative tarot spreads that includes mixing decks together, and this type of creativity is rarely encouraged by teachers or the literature. Bunning also states larger spreads are unnecessary, and I've had my own tarot teachers adopt a dismissive attitude towards larger spreads. This is quite interesting because the most popular YouTube tarot channels (as far as I can tell) mix a ton of cards together.