What do you think?
Rate this book
Madcap Masquerade
The Randwick family is as noble as any but lives in greatly reduced circumstances. When Loel Woodbine, Duke of Marche and heir to three fortunes, makes an offer for Miss Valeria Randwick's hand, it seems like a godsend, but the young lady has already promised her heart to another--and a commoner, at that. Desperate to avoid the marriage, Valeria concocts a wild scheme that depends upon the good graces of her monastery-raised brother, Valentine. When the prospective groom sees through the ruse, he surprises Valentine by agreeing to cooperate. But can Marche and Valentine fool London society while dealing with an accusation of murder and the distracting fascination between them?
Nook
First published December 1, 2009
6 people are currently reading
240 people want to read
About the author
Persephone Roth
3 books4 followersPersephone Artemis Roth lives in Savannah, Georgia, with two beagles, three foundling cats, and one husband, who works in public transportation. An avid rider, she wishes some day to live on a farm and breed horses, but for now, she's a city girl. She got her name from her father, a keen student of mythology, and her love of books from her librarian mother. Persephone is a lifelong admirer of Georgette Heyer and romance in general. She also loves Thai cuisine, glass painting, and walking at night.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 34 reviews
May 22, 2010
This is part of Dreamspinner’s “Timeless Dreams” line which states: A Timeless Dreams title: While reaction to same-sex relationships throughout time and across cultures has not always been positive, these stories celebrate M/M love in a manner that may address, minimize, or ignore historical stigma.
However, for reasons that I will explain, I don’t think this book – despite having a fanciful premise – needed the disclaimer regarding the gay culture.
I had to get my head in a certain place to read and enjoy this book, and that wasn’t very difficult; I treated it as a comedic historical of the light farce that some of Heyer’s books seem to have. The introduction to the protagonist and his butler at the beginning was particularly well done, and Negus, the butler, “had me at hello” as they say, as he really was an invention of comic genius, a rare enough thing in any genre, let alone gay historicals. He disrespects his master with just enough emphasis, backing off when he realises he’s gone too far, and it was for this very trait he was employed.
The beginning was slightly marred by Negus admitting that he’d lost 50 guineas whilst gambling, and this struck me as far too much–particularly for a servant–as this works out at about £40,000 in today’s money, so I didn’t blame Loel for saying that he’d be hard pressed to find the money in short order! I also found it a little “Clark Kent” as regards Valentine’s dual persona–an acquaintance meets Valentine and Marche while out walking and asks where Valeria is. However she’s given no excuse as to where the Duchess is, and she simply goes away. I think a stronger set up would have been essential for them to continue the masquerade than just parading one and then the other personality, perhaps having Valeria unwell or going to the country.
You might think that I would throw my hands up in horror at the faux marriage device used here, but I thoroughly enjoyed the idea – and the interpretation of it. I don’t know of any aristocratic family who did this, but I do know of one lesbian woman (the name of whom escapes me) who pretended to be a man all her life, and who did actually get away with getting “legally” married to a woman and living as man and wife all her life. So, while it’s hugely improbable, I won’t say it’s impossible.
Plus, it’s a good twist on the Regency, and in particular a gay Regency. It is actually nicely realised after Loel realises his new bride is a man, and the way the wedding night is managed. I was mentally comparing one of those “arranged marriage turns to love” heterosexual Regencies with this, and the way that Valentine behaves with Loel in public which emphasises very neatly the difference in the sexes. It was particularly amusing as to how Loel’s society friends behave with the new Duchess too, again emphasising the differences in how men and women were treated. I’ve long said that in some respects it’s easier to write gay Regency in public because men were far more affectionate towards each other than men are today — they could be alone together, share a bed without society being scandalised. They could ride in carriages alone; they often walked arm in arm or even hand in hand and no-one thought anything of it, whereas you can’t really leave your Regency heroine alone with a single man without impropriety being an issue. This book makes these points very clearly, “Valeria” finds herself alone with one of “her” husband’s friends and scandal ensues – but “Valentine” can be alone and in a state of undress – with Marche and no-one bats an eyelid. I was much appreciative of the subtle way these subtleties were outlined.
The sex is sweet, slightly purple and erotic, but I did find my eyes sliding over the page and moving along to the next plotty part, as they were simply a progression of Valentine’s induction into learning about his own body.
The “Dandies” – several of Marche’s friends are a delight, and great fun to read. They caused me to laugh out loud several times.
There’s a few historical inaccuracies, the worst of which being the very fact that holds much of the plot together, and on examination, simply doesn’t work. Loel’s aunt has left a substantial sum of money to the new Duchess, and she’s accused of murdering the old woman for this motive. Of course this falls down straight away, because, now being married, of course, the Duchess wouldn’t have any money of her own–it would all belong to Loel!
There are other historical issues (such as journeying to France and back, dropped off in England by French Pirates!) which might make a purely historical mind blanch and I think the worst one was this:(bear in mind that this was during the Regency, and therefore AFTER the French Revolution.
Which king, exactly?
The second half of the book is a lot weaker than the first; the pirate interlude is quite silly – and I simply couldn’t swallow them travelling to France, and there’s a ridiculous amount of coincidence as they meet up with just about everyone they left in England, and I couldn’t work out why they went there in the first place. The ending is rather laboured, it goes on for a good ten pages after the natural ending place, and gets a little dull as all the loose ends are gathered up. I have to say that the second half spoiled some of my enjoyment of the first half.
There’s a lot of good here, but some of it was spoiled for me with silly inaccuracies and a over-drawn out ending. That being said, it’s a good romp with a sparkle all of its own, and proves that even a theme that you think would be impossible to get away with in a gay historical is possible. Despite the problems I had with the book, I’d certainly try Ms Roth again.
However, for reasons that I will explain, I don’t think this book – despite having a fanciful premise – needed the disclaimer regarding the gay culture.
I had to get my head in a certain place to read and enjoy this book, and that wasn’t very difficult; I treated it as a comedic historical of the light farce that some of Heyer’s books seem to have. The introduction to the protagonist and his butler at the beginning was particularly well done, and Negus, the butler, “had me at hello” as they say, as he really was an invention of comic genius, a rare enough thing in any genre, let alone gay historicals. He disrespects his master with just enough emphasis, backing off when he realises he’s gone too far, and it was for this very trait he was employed.
The beginning was slightly marred by Negus admitting that he’d lost 50 guineas whilst gambling, and this struck me as far too much–particularly for a servant–as this works out at about £40,000 in today’s money, so I didn’t blame Loel for saying that he’d be hard pressed to find the money in short order! I also found it a little “Clark Kent” as regards Valentine’s dual persona–an acquaintance meets Valentine and Marche while out walking and asks where Valeria is. However she’s given no excuse as to where the Duchess is, and she simply goes away. I think a stronger set up would have been essential for them to continue the masquerade than just parading one and then the other personality, perhaps having Valeria unwell or going to the country.
You might think that I would throw my hands up in horror at the faux marriage device used here, but I thoroughly enjoyed the idea – and the interpretation of it. I don’t know of any aristocratic family who did this, but I do know of one lesbian woman (the name of whom escapes me) who pretended to be a man all her life, and who did actually get away with getting “legally” married to a woman and living as man and wife all her life. So, while it’s hugely improbable, I won’t say it’s impossible.
Plus, it’s a good twist on the Regency, and in particular a gay Regency. It is actually nicely realised after Loel realises his new bride is a man, and the way the wedding night is managed. I was mentally comparing one of those “arranged marriage turns to love” heterosexual Regencies with this, and the way that Valentine behaves with Loel in public which emphasises very neatly the difference in the sexes. It was particularly amusing as to how Loel’s society friends behave with the new Duchess too, again emphasising the differences in how men and women were treated. I’ve long said that in some respects it’s easier to write gay Regency in public because men were far more affectionate towards each other than men are today — they could be alone together, share a bed without society being scandalised. They could ride in carriages alone; they often walked arm in arm or even hand in hand and no-one thought anything of it, whereas you can’t really leave your Regency heroine alone with a single man without impropriety being an issue. This book makes these points very clearly, “Valeria” finds herself alone with one of “her” husband’s friends and scandal ensues – but “Valentine” can be alone and in a state of undress – with Marche and no-one bats an eyelid. I was much appreciative of the subtle way these subtleties were outlined.
The sex is sweet, slightly purple and erotic, but I did find my eyes sliding over the page and moving along to the next plotty part, as they were simply a progression of Valentine’s induction into learning about his own body.
The “Dandies” – several of Marche’s friends are a delight, and great fun to read. They caused me to laugh out loud several times.
There’s a few historical inaccuracies, the worst of which being the very fact that holds much of the plot together, and on examination, simply doesn’t work. Loel’s aunt has left a substantial sum of money to the new Duchess, and she’s accused of murdering the old woman for this motive. Of course this falls down straight away, because, now being married, of course, the Duchess wouldn’t have any money of her own–it would all belong to Loel!
There are other historical issues (such as journeying to France and back, dropped off in England by French Pirates!) which might make a purely historical mind blanch and I think the worst one was this:(bear in mind that this was during the Regency, and therefore AFTER the French Revolution.
In truth, I am a French officer with a letter of marque from the king.
Which king, exactly?
The second half of the book is a lot weaker than the first; the pirate interlude is quite silly – and I simply couldn’t swallow them travelling to France, and there’s a ridiculous amount of coincidence as they meet up with just about everyone they left in England, and I couldn’t work out why they went there in the first place. The ending is rather laboured, it goes on for a good ten pages after the natural ending place, and gets a little dull as all the loose ends are gathered up. I have to say that the second half spoiled some of my enjoyment of the first half.
There’s a lot of good here, but some of it was spoiled for me with silly inaccuracies and a over-drawn out ending. That being said, it’s a good romp with a sparkle all of its own, and proves that even a theme that you think would be impossible to get away with in a gay historical is possible. Despite the problems I had with the book, I’d certainly try Ms Roth again.
January 12, 2010
This book has snappy dialogue that never is not in the style of the time which I respect so much. The bantering between the two main characters goes back and forth and it's witty and funny and I just never wanted it to end! Get this book, you will not be disappointed.
February 17, 2014
I love the language of this. It reminds me of actual Victorian romantic novels I haven't read.
I dunno if it's even the right time period (but who cares, right, because everything old is just classified in the Old period, yeah? [I'm joking, of course]) but it does make me think of Jane Austen and I dunno, other stuff, but more readable.
And as with an Austen novel, as soon as I get all excited about the nasty little web of intrigue being woven, it devolves into fuck knows and I have no fucking clue what the fuck is going on. After a brief, half-the-book span of confusion and who the fuck knows, it eventually pulls through with a conclusion: the good guys win. Somehow or other, it came to pass, and then there's riding-off-into-the-sunset-ness.
...wait a mo. Is this Regency? Something about the calling cards made me think it was Regency. Of course, the fact that there was a Prince Regent and his name was George didn't tip me off. It was the fact that to visit people, you need calling cards to put in a fancy little basket to be taken to the master.
Froop-dee-doo, go me.
The name "Loel" ain't like none Ah evah seen afo', but it resembles "Lowell," which apparently means "young wolf." Coolio.
Also like an Austen novel, it turns out there's more after the clusterfuck of confusion.
Yes, the entire thing was waaay too main-character-power-driven, and Valentine's like thiiis close to being a Mary Sue (YMMV; some may think he's tipped over the edge), but I went with it and I thought it was fun and stuff.
It's like that one Elizabethan one, except this one doesn't try as hard to make things make sense/explain things, so in a sense, there's less to call bullshit about.
I dunno if it's even the right time period (but who cares, right, because everything old is just classified in the Old period, yeah? [I'm joking, of course]) but it does make me think of Jane Austen and I dunno, other stuff, but more readable.
And as with an Austen novel, as soon as I get all excited about the nasty little web of intrigue being woven, it devolves into fuck knows and I have no fucking clue what the fuck is going on. After a brief, half-the-book span of confusion and who the fuck knows, it eventually pulls through with a conclusion: the good guys win. Somehow or other, it came to pass, and then there's riding-off-into-the-sunset-ness.
...wait a mo. Is this Regency? Something about the calling cards made me think it was Regency. Of course, the fact that there was a Prince Regent and his name was George didn't tip me off. It was the fact that to visit people, you need calling cards to put in a fancy little basket to be taken to the master.
Froop-dee-doo, go me.
The name "Loel" ain't like none Ah evah seen afo', but it resembles "Lowell," which apparently means "young wolf." Coolio.
Also like an Austen novel, it turns out there's more after the clusterfuck of confusion.
Yes, the entire thing was waaay too main-character-power-driven, and Valentine's like thiiis close to being a Mary Sue (YMMV; some may think he's tipped over the edge), but I went with it and I thought it was fun and stuff.
It's like that one Elizabethan one, except this one doesn't try as hard to make things make sense/explain things, so in a sense, there's less to call bullshit about.
February 3, 2010
I have a feeling that Madcap Masquerade is book that people will either love or hate. For me, my opinion doesn’t go all the way to love, but I enjoyed it and found myself re-reading big chunks of it prior to writing this review, which is always a personal subconscious sign that I liked a book quite a bit.
Now, let’s get some details out of the way. This is a Dreamspinner “Timeless Dreams” title that comes with the disclaimer that, “…these stories celebrate M/M love in a manner that may address, minimize, or ignore historical stigma.” So, historical fiction purists be warned: this book may not be your cup of tea. But if you can get past that issue or don’t really care, you might enjoy this book as much as I did.
I will admit, I started reading this as a “straight” (well, gay) historical. At about the one-third point I thought things were getting a little preposterous and I was feeling annoyed, but I kept going. Then, I looked at the cover: Madcap Masquerade. Aha, I thought—maybe the author’s intention was to have this be a madcap romantic comedy. So I adjusted my thinking and kept on reading. As a “madcap” story it worked better, but this is probably the biggest weakness of the book. I think it is tough to be really funny with themes of murder, embezzlement, and betrayal. Certainly the author kept a light touch but it makes it hard for the story to be completely “over-the-top” which is what it needed to be to truly succeed as a comedy. On the other hand, if you read it as a mostly light-hearted romp and don’t dwell on the serious stuff, it mostly works.
What I liked the best was the interaction between Valentine and Loel and fortunately, they get a lot of page time which went a long way to keeping me interested in the story. They meet for the first time at their wedding, where Valentine is disguised as his sister Valeria. When Loel kisses his bride at the ceremony, she swoons. He takes her into the vestry, locks the door, loosens her corset and realizes that she is really a he. He’s a little surprised at this turn of events but not totally unhappy as he likes what he sees in Valentine, with his long dark hair, coltish frame, and violet eyes.
Valentine, for his part, is totally surprised at his reaction to Loel’s kiss (he had an erection) and Loel’s frank admission that he prefers men over women. But he’s no dummy and he realizes he needs to continue the charade for at least a little while until Valeria is safely married to the man she really loves. Once that happens, Valentine can sort out what he will do with his life and next steps.
Loel decides he wants to get Valentine into his bed but then surprises himself by starting to fall for the young man before the seduction occurs. Valentine also realizes he is developing very strong feelings, very quickly, for the man he is married to. Instead of ignoring each other or their emotions (and having some sort of blasted miscommunication; none of that here, thank God), they talk; Loel tells Valentine he’ll teach him about physical intimacy and “the ways of the flesh” while Valentine, in turn, will teach his husband and ultimate lover what it truly means to love someone. This was the strongest theme of the book and one that I felt was carried through very consistently and made the book work for me. Val and Loel are a good pair and as they get to know each other better and fall deeper in love they ratchet up the banter and witty dialog as well as the heat of their sexual encounters. Like I said, when they were on the page, I devoured every word; when they were absent, I tended to read a little faster.
The writing is colorful. Some may say too colorful to the point of being purple, but it didn’t bother me. I enjoyed the elaborate descriptions of clothing, food, and interior decorations. Granted, during some of the sex scenes there were velvet sheaths and throbbing rods which I know are an instant turn-off for many readers but for me, it worked as part of the overall florid narrative.
All in all, I liked this book and would recommend it with the caveat that it is probably not for everyone. I would suggest reading an excerpt—there is a lengthy one at the Dreamspinner site to give you a feel for the author’s writing style. It appears that this is Persephone Roth’s first book and as a debut, I think it succeeds although as noted above, it’s not perfect. Even so, I look forward to more stories from her in the future. And as a final note, I love the beautiful Anne Cain cover, even though in my mind, I pictured Loel (he’s the blond) as a slightly larger and perhaps more mature man. But that’s a really minor quibble!
(originally posted at Speak Its Name, 1/13/2010
Now, let’s get some details out of the way. This is a Dreamspinner “Timeless Dreams” title that comes with the disclaimer that, “…these stories celebrate M/M love in a manner that may address, minimize, or ignore historical stigma.” So, historical fiction purists be warned: this book may not be your cup of tea. But if you can get past that issue or don’t really care, you might enjoy this book as much as I did.
I will admit, I started reading this as a “straight” (well, gay) historical. At about the one-third point I thought things were getting a little preposterous and I was feeling annoyed, but I kept going. Then, I looked at the cover: Madcap Masquerade. Aha, I thought—maybe the author’s intention was to have this be a madcap romantic comedy. So I adjusted my thinking and kept on reading. As a “madcap” story it worked better, but this is probably the biggest weakness of the book. I think it is tough to be really funny with themes of murder, embezzlement, and betrayal. Certainly the author kept a light touch but it makes it hard for the story to be completely “over-the-top” which is what it needed to be to truly succeed as a comedy. On the other hand, if you read it as a mostly light-hearted romp and don’t dwell on the serious stuff, it mostly works.
What I liked the best was the interaction between Valentine and Loel and fortunately, they get a lot of page time which went a long way to keeping me interested in the story. They meet for the first time at their wedding, where Valentine is disguised as his sister Valeria. When Loel kisses his bride at the ceremony, she swoons. He takes her into the vestry, locks the door, loosens her corset and realizes that she is really a he. He’s a little surprised at this turn of events but not totally unhappy as he likes what he sees in Valentine, with his long dark hair, coltish frame, and violet eyes.
Valentine, for his part, is totally surprised at his reaction to Loel’s kiss (he had an erection) and Loel’s frank admission that he prefers men over women. But he’s no dummy and he realizes he needs to continue the charade for at least a little while until Valeria is safely married to the man she really loves. Once that happens, Valentine can sort out what he will do with his life and next steps.
Loel decides he wants to get Valentine into his bed but then surprises himself by starting to fall for the young man before the seduction occurs. Valentine also realizes he is developing very strong feelings, very quickly, for the man he is married to. Instead of ignoring each other or their emotions (and having some sort of blasted miscommunication; none of that here, thank God), they talk; Loel tells Valentine he’ll teach him about physical intimacy and “the ways of the flesh” while Valentine, in turn, will teach his husband and ultimate lover what it truly means to love someone. This was the strongest theme of the book and one that I felt was carried through very consistently and made the book work for me. Val and Loel are a good pair and as they get to know each other better and fall deeper in love they ratchet up the banter and witty dialog as well as the heat of their sexual encounters. Like I said, when they were on the page, I devoured every word; when they were absent, I tended to read a little faster.
The writing is colorful. Some may say too colorful to the point of being purple, but it didn’t bother me. I enjoyed the elaborate descriptions of clothing, food, and interior decorations. Granted, during some of the sex scenes there were velvet sheaths and throbbing rods which I know are an instant turn-off for many readers but for me, it worked as part of the overall florid narrative.
All in all, I liked this book and would recommend it with the caveat that it is probably not for everyone. I would suggest reading an excerpt—there is a lengthy one at the Dreamspinner site to give you a feel for the author’s writing style. It appears that this is Persephone Roth’s first book and as a debut, I think it succeeds although as noted above, it’s not perfect. Even so, I look forward to more stories from her in the future. And as a final note, I love the beautiful Anne Cain cover, even though in my mind, I pictured Loel (he’s the blond) as a slightly larger and perhaps more mature man. But that’s a really minor quibble!
(originally posted at Speak Its Name, 1/13/2010
December 22, 2018
Я бы назвала эту книгу фельетоном в псевдоисторических декорациях. Искать какие-то исторические соответствия в ней так же бесполезно, как искать тридевятое царство на карте мира. История с юмором и даже каким-то детективом и пиратами! Мне очень понравилось. Скрасила мое сумасшедшее путешествие в Каир.
November 3, 2017
I bought this years ago (despite that awful cover), and finally decided to have a look at it. There were some good things in it, but I was skimming by the end. This book kind of has a bit of everything--instalove, instalust, disguises, murder, kidnapping, disputed inheritances, lookalike siblings, a sham marriage, pirates, runaway lovers, scheming underlings, cross-dressing, princes, sword fights, duels, a chase to France, wise-cracking sidekicks, amazing coincidences, a Snidely-Whiplash-style villain, and more! It's like bits of every Shakespeare comedy plot mixed together, and there are so, so many classic romance tropes here. So, on one level, this is very cool and totally the sort of thing I would go for, but the execution was so uneven, as was the writing and the tone. It's all over the place with little holding it together and some of it was very hard to swallow. It's like the author couldn't decide what kind of book this was--tense murder mystery, super sappy bodice-ripper romance, madcap comedy caper, action-adventure story, gay erotica, or legal drama, and went with all of the above with very mixed results. It has its moments, but ultimately left me unsatisfied.
It sounds like it will be a light romance, but it starts off with a really sad murder and solving the murder is everyone's main focus (except for the lovers, who have sex all the time when they aren't making goo-goo eyes at each other). I think the three dandies, who are funny secondary characters, were my favourite part of this book. Actually, all the secondary characters were great--it was the main characters I wasn't too fussed about, with their inconsistent and superficial characterisation and their throbbing members. The plot was all over the place and throws in some pirates for no obvious reason and a strange trip to France. There's a cartoon-ish, mustache-twirling villain, whose schemes are unrealistic and implausible. The writing has some great moments in regards to dialogue, but often skews to the very purple side of the scale with the lovers having frequent and oddly-timed sex breaks. This has a "not historically accurate in terms of attitudes towards homosexuality" warning, but the outpouring of support towards the couple is overwhelming and awkward and completely over-the-top.
This could have been so much better.
It sounds like it will be a light romance, but it starts off with a really sad murder and solving the murder is everyone's main focus (except for the lovers, who have sex all the time when they aren't making goo-goo eyes at each other). I think the three dandies, who are funny secondary characters, were my favourite part of this book. Actually, all the secondary characters were great--it was the main characters I wasn't too fussed about, with their inconsistent and superficial characterisation and their throbbing members. The plot was all over the place and throws in some pirates for no obvious reason and a strange trip to France. There's a cartoon-ish, mustache-twirling villain, whose schemes are unrealistic and implausible. The writing has some great moments in regards to dialogue, but often skews to the very purple side of the scale with the lovers having frequent and oddly-timed sex breaks. This has a "not historically accurate in terms of attitudes towards homosexuality" warning, but the outpouring of support towards the couple is overwhelming and awkward and completely over-the-top.
This could have been so much better.
July 8, 2019
A decent, if improbable, story.
July 4, 2010
A delightful historical romance. I read it in two days. I'm not a voracious reader. If a book bores me I tend to lose interest and move on to another book, this one held my interest. Suffice it to say when I read six chapters in one sitting without stopping, believe me the book is GOOD! It was well plotted and the characters well developed. There were some definite editing problems, most notably words were dropped from sentences, but the dialogue fit the time period and I was immediately drawn into the relationship between Lord Marche and Valentine. Well worth the money. (And the cover is very nice as well, which actually drew me to the book in the first place. So, in this instance, judging the book by the cover fits.) :)
January 8, 2012
This is a pleasant, easy-to-read book that fits beautifully into the genre of Regency Romance.
Each chapter was the ideal size for me, and I always wanted to go on to the next.
The language is nicely done - just one instance of 'anyways' for 'anyway' struck me as incongruous, otherwise there was little unforgiveable.
Ms Roth says she loves Georgette Heyer, and this book is a m/m romance that could easily have been written by the great lady, if she had ever dreamed of such a thing.
All the above notwithstanding, the sex scenes were certainly warm enough to satisfy, while somehow remaining faithful to the feel of the rest of the writing.
The witty repartee was great fun.
Each chapter was the ideal size for me, and I always wanted to go on to the next.
The language is nicely done - just one instance of 'anyways' for 'anyway' struck me as incongruous, otherwise there was little unforgiveable.
Ms Roth says she loves Georgette Heyer, and this book is a m/m romance that could easily have been written by the great lady, if she had ever dreamed of such a thing.
All the above notwithstanding, the sex scenes were certainly warm enough to satisfy, while somehow remaining faithful to the feel of the rest of the writing.
The witty repartee was great fun.
January 24, 2010
3.5 stars
I really enjoyed this charming and humorous Historical romance. The writing is good, the characters are entertaining and I was happy to have read the story.
My complete review is posted at Rainbow Reviews
I really enjoyed this charming and humorous Historical romance. The writing is good, the characters are entertaining and I was happy to have read the story.
My complete review is posted at Rainbow Reviews
June 2, 2011
It is what it is a fluffy romance novel.
January 11, 2010
I admit I chose this book due to the cover and thought it’d be a sweet historical. Well it is a sweet historical story with no real truth to the timeframe except the utterly dry writing and bland, boring plot. I struggled to get through the first 100 pages and almost gave up several times before committing myself and getting through the book. The prose is wordy, awkward, and uninteresting while the characters are very classic stereotypes with only outside influences to create artificial tension. The book struggles significantly on how to keep the characters interesting while London society has no issues with homosexuals. Although the warning has said these stories specifically don’t deal with realistic historical repercussions, I found the obvious and overt support for their lifestyle to be over the top, even with the warning.
Loel Woodbine is a classic rake who is happy to spend his stipend lazily while whoring his way through the male population. His wealthy, dying aunt decides that Loel must get married to the daughter of an old family friend. Loel agrees easily and without qualm because he knows his aunt controls the money and this will ensure his inheritance while he can continue his sexual escapades on the side. Unfortunately the intended bride loves another and decides to send her identical twin brother, dressed as a woman, in her place. Well given Loel’s persuasion, he’s only too happy to keep the pretty, innocent young man around yet all around the two murder, chaos, and thievery abounds.
Here the characters start as very classic and familiar stereotypes. Loel is the rake who’s never been in love and can’t wait to ravish the innocent, virginal Valentine. Valentine has been raised by monks in the countryside and is completely gulliable and simplistic. Loel predictably falls in love immediately, proclaiming his love within a few chapters as the two immediately set upon deflowering Valentine’s virgin status. Everyone accepts the ruse of Valentine as a woman except one man who is determined to ruin both Loel and Valentine. The characters are staid and predictable from their declarations of love to their overly wordy dialogue. About halfway through the story, the characters take an abrupt change when Valentine starts to have a rapier wit, sharp tongue and clever intelligence that has been completely lacking up to that point. The sheltered young man who can barely speak without blushing is then exchanging bawdy comments, figuring out complicated schemes, and engaging in vigorous and frequent sex. The complete change in character is ridiculous and nothing is offered as the catalyst except sex. A few months of good sex erases 20 years of teaching.
Furthermore the story uses the antics of one villain, known early on in the story, to set up problem after problem for the happy couple. Each problem is presented causing the two to run off here or there with a great deal of sex and action. Then the problem is either ignored or forgotten until the very end with a somewhat ridiculous court scene. This final resolution wraps up all the problems with a predictable bow even as the antics of all involved are over the top. Here again all the consequences of homosexuality at that time are ignored, but that’s expected in the warning. However, I didn’t expect the story to go further and actually have almost everyone support and promote the lifestyle. There is not any question of hiding the relationship or a single disapproving person. Everyone encountered is either a closeted homosexual or understands how deeply the two men are in love and think it’s wonderful they are together. I would have preferred the story to stick to more historical lines and instead of adding a specific consequence, it could have at least kept the relationship somewhat quiet.
Unfortunately for me the biggest problem for the story, not counting poor characterization and a predictable plot, is the actual writing. The dialogue is awkward and overblown, trying very hard to be in a perceived historical style but ultimately delivers a dry, boring narration. The story is punctuated by never ending dialogue tags, which could be forgiven if the actual words weren't so awkward and unwieldly. The point of view changes arbitrarily from person to person and the prose choices jump from modern to antiquated. Often the sex scenes would be one long paragraph with no breaks until a sentence or two of dialogue and then back to one long paragraph.
Since the villain is told early, the story is really about the two men as they have sex and navigate the problems the villain sets for them. There is no tension about their relationship or what will happen, merely how they will find the time to chase said villain between bouts of sex. The character of Valentine is more entertaining once he’s started talking back and trading quips with Loel, but too often the story then throws yet another ridiculous, easily solved problem to give them something else to do. Valentine’s maturation and growth from a cloistered innocent man to a worldly, sophisticated man would have been much more interesting and compelling, even with such a common theme. The instant love between the men took away any potential conflict between them and thus relied on the one evil person to orchestrate the action in the book. Considering the villain is very flat without much to add complexity to the character, this ultimately ruined the story.
Although I didn’t find much redeeming about this offering if you think this sounds interesting and delightful, this book could be to your liking. The characters are familiar and the action common for a regency-type romance so perhaps those who like easy, breezy, predictable historical romances may find this book more fun than I did. Unfortunately I wouldn’t recommend this book, even with its beautiful cover.
Loel Woodbine is a classic rake who is happy to spend his stipend lazily while whoring his way through the male population. His wealthy, dying aunt decides that Loel must get married to the daughter of an old family friend. Loel agrees easily and without qualm because he knows his aunt controls the money and this will ensure his inheritance while he can continue his sexual escapades on the side. Unfortunately the intended bride loves another and decides to send her identical twin brother, dressed as a woman, in her place. Well given Loel’s persuasion, he’s only too happy to keep the pretty, innocent young man around yet all around the two murder, chaos, and thievery abounds.
Here the characters start as very classic and familiar stereotypes. Loel is the rake who’s never been in love and can’t wait to ravish the innocent, virginal Valentine. Valentine has been raised by monks in the countryside and is completely gulliable and simplistic. Loel predictably falls in love immediately, proclaiming his love within a few chapters as the two immediately set upon deflowering Valentine’s virgin status. Everyone accepts the ruse of Valentine as a woman except one man who is determined to ruin both Loel and Valentine. The characters are staid and predictable from their declarations of love to their overly wordy dialogue. About halfway through the story, the characters take an abrupt change when Valentine starts to have a rapier wit, sharp tongue and clever intelligence that has been completely lacking up to that point. The sheltered young man who can barely speak without blushing is then exchanging bawdy comments, figuring out complicated schemes, and engaging in vigorous and frequent sex. The complete change in character is ridiculous and nothing is offered as the catalyst except sex. A few months of good sex erases 20 years of teaching.
Furthermore the story uses the antics of one villain, known early on in the story, to set up problem after problem for the happy couple. Each problem is presented causing the two to run off here or there with a great deal of sex and action. Then the problem is either ignored or forgotten until the very end with a somewhat ridiculous court scene. This final resolution wraps up all the problems with a predictable bow even as the antics of all involved are over the top. Here again all the consequences of homosexuality at that time are ignored, but that’s expected in the warning. However, I didn’t expect the story to go further and actually have almost everyone support and promote the lifestyle. There is not any question of hiding the relationship or a single disapproving person. Everyone encountered is either a closeted homosexual or understands how deeply the two men are in love and think it’s wonderful they are together. I would have preferred the story to stick to more historical lines and instead of adding a specific consequence, it could have at least kept the relationship somewhat quiet.
Unfortunately for me the biggest problem for the story, not counting poor characterization and a predictable plot, is the actual writing. The dialogue is awkward and overblown, trying very hard to be in a perceived historical style but ultimately delivers a dry, boring narration. The story is punctuated by never ending dialogue tags, which could be forgiven if the actual words weren't so awkward and unwieldly. The point of view changes arbitrarily from person to person and the prose choices jump from modern to antiquated. Often the sex scenes would be one long paragraph with no breaks until a sentence or two of dialogue and then back to one long paragraph.
Since the villain is told early, the story is really about the two men as they have sex and navigate the problems the villain sets for them. There is no tension about their relationship or what will happen, merely how they will find the time to chase said villain between bouts of sex. The character of Valentine is more entertaining once he’s started talking back and trading quips with Loel, but too often the story then throws yet another ridiculous, easily solved problem to give them something else to do. Valentine’s maturation and growth from a cloistered innocent man to a worldly, sophisticated man would have been much more interesting and compelling, even with such a common theme. The instant love between the men took away any potential conflict between them and thus relied on the one evil person to orchestrate the action in the book. Considering the villain is very flat without much to add complexity to the character, this ultimately ruined the story.
Although I didn’t find much redeeming about this offering if you think this sounds interesting and delightful, this book could be to your liking. The characters are familiar and the action common for a regency-type romance so perhaps those who like easy, breezy, predictable historical romances may find this book more fun than I did. Unfortunately I wouldn’t recommend this book, even with its beautiful cover.
July 25, 2017
3.5... there was something about the execution of the plot, like it was out of control. I liked the characters, liked the storyline, but at times I felt it wasn't consistent, like calling Marshe Loel in one breath and Your Grace the next. I've also never seen dukes called 'sir' or marchionesses 'ma'am'. How did Valentine walk into the London house as a woman but leave as a man and the staff, who greeted them at their arrival did not notice? Did Murdmont kill Valentine's dad or Not? Vague things mentioned once and not followed up on, etc.
Instalovey and sometimes they went overboard with their I love you so much no I love you more you're everything to me I'd die without you kind of thing, but I did like it. Different, funny, and too clever for its own good.
Instalovey and sometimes they went overboard with their I love you so much no I love you more you're everything to me I'd die without you kind of thing, but I did like it. Different, funny, and too clever for its own good.
March 18, 2019
A fun and silly historical romp, if a bit anachronistic. You probably need to suspend your disbelief while reading this, and you shouldn't take it much too seriously. There were a little bit too many dei ex machina (yes, that's the plural of deus ex machina!) for my taste - but again, suspension of disbelief.
Besides the character growth, and the way the two main characters influenced each other to see different sides of the world, I also loved the banter between Marche and Valentine. Absolutely made the book for me. I was thinking that perhaps there were a few hints about a possible sequel concerning Strand, actually, but it seems like the author hasn't written anything else, which is such a shame. I would've loved to read more of her works.
Besides the character growth, and the way the two main characters influenced each other to see different sides of the world, I also loved the banter between Marche and Valentine. Absolutely made the book for me. I was thinking that perhaps there were a few hints about a possible sequel concerning Strand, actually, but it seems like the author hasn't written anything else, which is such a shame. I would've loved to read more of her works.
January 28, 2019
3.2 stars
February 10, 2023
Funny in unexpected ways. Good story.
August 26, 2010
This is a rather typical book with typical characters and a typical plot. The beginning is quite enjoyable, but the middle is marred by some abrupt plot twists that seemed out of the picture.
Furthermore, I just couldn't put up with the secondary characters' reaction to the relationship between the two main characters. It seemed, that everyone around them was so content with that situation and happy for the two lovers, that they absolutely forgot that those two lovers were both men. Well, it seems quite unlikely, that in those times people could express such tolerance.
Also the ending was so sappy and twee, that I had to force myself through it.
The characters (especially some secondary characters) were likable, but they had nothing new about their personalities - everything has been created and described earlier by other authors.
What I liked about the narration was the solidness of language in the dialogues. Those were always in the style of the times described in the book.
So, if you don't expect much from this book, you may even like it ;)
Furthermore, I just couldn't put up with the secondary characters' reaction to the relationship between the two main characters. It seemed, that everyone around them was so content with that situation and happy for the two lovers, that they absolutely forgot that those two lovers were both men. Well, it seems quite unlikely, that in those times people could express such tolerance.
Also the ending was so sappy and twee, that I had to force myself through it.
The characters (especially some secondary characters) were likable, but they had nothing new about their personalities - everything has been created and described earlier by other authors.
What I liked about the narration was the solidness of language in the dialogues. Those were always in the style of the times described in the book.
So, if you don't expect much from this book, you may even like it ;)
December 25, 2014
I must admit that the premise of this book sounded good. Unfortunately, the story wasn’t to my liking. The masquerade itself was totally unbelievable and I don’t think it would have worked in real life.
Both lead characters were very likeable. Loel was attracted to Valentine instantly and didn’t hesitate to let him know. There were three or so very graphic sex scenes, which I enjoyed. They professed their love for one another way too soon.
I feel like the mystery as to who murdered a certain someone took over most of the story and that disappointed me. I wanted to read a romance, not mystery.
Both heroes ages weren’t given nor was the year this story took place. That info should always be given. Oddly and throughout the entire story, a word from a sentence would be missing for no reason. I’ve never encountered that before.
Overall, I was unsatisfied and I’m not sure if I’d try this author again.
I received this book from the publisher in exchange for an honest review.
Both lead characters were very likeable. Loel was attracted to Valentine instantly and didn’t hesitate to let him know. There were three or so very graphic sex scenes, which I enjoyed. They professed their love for one another way too soon.
I feel like the mystery as to who murdered a certain someone took over most of the story and that disappointed me. I wanted to read a romance, not mystery.
Both heroes ages weren’t given nor was the year this story took place. That info should always be given. Oddly and throughout the entire story, a word from a sentence would be missing for no reason. I’ve never encountered that before.
Overall, I was unsatisfied and I’m not sure if I’d try this author again.
I received this book from the publisher in exchange for an honest review.
February 1, 2010
I don't usually read historical romance and maybe that's why I loved this book, as I had no exact expectations when I started reading it.
It was funny, it had adventure and romance, it had everything. The characters were great, even the side characters like Valentine's sister, were well thought out and didn't seem flat and underdeveloped at all. The ending was satisfying, as well, and there weren't any questions left unanswered.
It was funny, it had adventure and romance, it had everything. The characters were great, even the side characters like Valentine's sister, were well thought out and didn't seem flat and underdeveloped at all. The ending was satisfying, as well, and there weren't any questions left unanswered.
August 12, 2016
Lots of things going on here. Valentine takes the place of his sister and "marries" Loel. Loel discovers the deception but soon falls in love with Valentine.
In the meantime there is murder, thievery, treachery, cross the country and cross the channel chases, pirates, kidnapping and I swear I saw a kitchen sink go floating by :)
Witty jokes, snarky humor and finally true love all combine to make this a thoroughly enjoyable read.
Recommended.
In the meantime there is murder, thievery, treachery, cross the country and cross the channel chases, pirates, kidnapping and I swear I saw a kitchen sink go floating by :)
Witty jokes, snarky humor and finally true love all combine to make this a thoroughly enjoyable read.
Recommended.
February 5, 2011
This was great fun, full of light hearted humor and hot lovin'. Even the secondary characters were well crafted and enjoyable. Val and Loel were perfectly suited for each other. Val tempered Loel's cynicism and Loel brought out Val's mischievous side. Plus I love it when the bad guy gets what's coming to him. It's a sign that a book is good when after 300 pages you still want more. :)
August 19, 2016
I like the theme in this story that how valentine and loel got married.and how valentine played the part of women or we must say valeria his sister.
But I am giving 4 star not 5 because in between I got bored in the story line. There was one time I wanted to leave this book. But I made it to the end..and I liked the ending...
And happy ending makes me happy...:)
But I am giving 4 star not 5 because in between I got bored in the story line. There was one time I wanted to leave this book. But I made it to the end..and I liked the ending...
And happy ending makes me happy...:)
March 21, 2013
There were a couple of shifts in the story that felt somewhat abrupt, but other than that I enjoyed this funny, light and romantic book.
I liked Strand and his two friends. It was hard not to smile whenever they showed up.
October 8, 2016
This was an interesting story with lots of twists and turns. The author did a good job of making an impossible situation seem possible! That's why I love fiction - love conquers all and happy endings!!
Part of the "Dreamspinner Press Connie Bailey Bundle".
Part of the "Dreamspinner Press Connie Bailey Bundle".
July 25, 2011
1st. read: 1/8/10-1/10/10
November 23, 2013
Usually I don't care for historical romance. This is a fun read, fast-paced with humourous dialogs.
I thoroughly enjoyed it.
I thoroughly enjoyed it.
February 14, 2010
The first two chapters were a little hard to get into, but from that point on it read well. It has a well thought out plot. It reminds me of "Sense and Sensibility" or "Pride and Prejudice."
April 23, 2012
Very minimal angst between the two characters but there were some disturbing deeds by the evildoers. This is a relatively light sweet read.
April 25, 2014
Okay. I get that one of the two characters was masquerading as his sister, but the characterization was weirdly feminizing in a non-reflective way.
April 12, 2016
3,75 stars.
Dialogue heavy, with few descriptions of the characters. Overall, very entertaining.
Dialogue heavy, with few descriptions of the characters. Overall, very entertaining.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 34 reviews