Kevin Randle's Crash was an interesting survey of UFO crash reports. The vast majority of the book is presented in "seed catalog" style: you get a date, a location, and a short description.
Some cases are accorded more coverage.
I think many people might find it...less engaging than some other works on the subject. It is presented largely dispassionately, which I found attractive. For readers who come to it with a strong opinion either in favor of an extraordinary origin for UFO reports, or against it, they won't find a book designed to please them.
Many reports are dismissed, or assessed as hoaxes.
On the other hand, there are a very few for which an extraordinary origin is deemed to be likely.
If you are a "true believer", that may upset you. If you are a Skeptic (with a capital "S"...what I call a "true disbeliever"), that may also upset you.
I will say that there are some cases where the original investigator may be treated...well, I'm going to go with "critically". I would say there may be some existing conflicts here, although that could do with approach rather than with personality.
Overall, I found it interesting, and a worthwhile read...but reading a book written from an advocatory position (pro or con) can be more entertaining.