TL;DR All in all, from about the 60% mark in the book all the way to like the 98% mark of the book, it's actually kind of excellent. There is a lot of good action, some very powerful character moments. It's generally well paced and written, with real dramatic tension. But the first 60% of the book is a terrible drudgery of repetition, recaps, and just general boring shit no one cares about going on. The last 2% is a rage inducing diatribe on Goodkind's simplistic and childish vision of black and white morality, and then it sweeps all the world's problems under the rug, by way of one of the most insulting and lazy uses of Deus ex Machina in literary history, so the good guys don't actually have to confront and deal with them. I can reccomend it to anyone who has made it this far and wants to see how it ends. It is vastly better than the several books that came before it, but it also has many of the same problems. If you can put up with the first half to get to the last half, you'll probably enjoy it.
Looking back at the Sword of Truth series as a whole, now that I'm done rereading it, I would say that Wizard's First Rule, Stone of Tears, and Blood of the Fold are great books, but not without their flaws, and they are definitely not for everyone. Temple of the Winds and Soul of the fire are bad, but they are kind of in the laughably bad category. If you're someone who likes stuff that's so bad it's entertaining to laugh at it, you'll probably enjoy them. Faith of the Fallen, in my opinion is excellent, and the best book in the series. Pillars of Creation, Naked Empire, Chainfire, and Phantom are a terrible drudgery to get through. They are badly written, do not understand even basic human behavior or emotion, repeat themselves into oblivion, tell rather than showing, and recap previous volumes in the series to a ridiculous degree. The first half of Confessor is garbage, but the last half is actually very good, except for the very, very end. Everything after Confessor is a boring chore to read, and no one should ever even attempt to do so, in my opinion. In short though some of the series is worth reading, the majority of it is not.
There are spoilers past this point.
So I cracked this book open, and only three paragraphs in, I rolled my eyes and sighed. Yeah. It's gonna be like that. Just the sheer pompous arrogance of the writing alone was worth a sigh and an eye roll. I can tell up front that this is going to be another 600 pages of nothing but Terry Goodkind stroking his own dick. 3 chapters in, and, well, ridiculous repetition in the dialog, and just so many unnecessary recaps of previous books. As the thought of writing out a real review in my old format for this book fills me with dread and disgust, I will do what I did with the several previous books in this series. Post my notes while reading.
30% done:
Okay. So, Richard playing sports at the beginning of this book. There's a reason that a lot of people dislike the holodeck episodes of Star Trek, the SJW stuff in The Last Jedi, and the Quidditch in Harry Potter. When you get right down to it, we are watching Star Trek to see Star Trek characters doing Star Trek things. We're not watching Star Trek to see Star Trek Characters acting out Sherlock Holmes, westerns, Jane Austin, 1920s detective stories, etc. That's why few people enjoy those episodes. It's the same for the SJW stuff in Star Wars. We don't watch Star Wars to be lectured on social equality. We watch it to see Star Wars people doing Star Wars things. And the less said about Quidditch in Harry Potter the better. Needless to say, we do not read Harry Potter for sports, and neither do we read The Sword of Truth for sports either. Do you kind of see the point I'm getting at here? You've got a world on the brink of destruction. The last bastion of safety for freedom is under siege by an enormous and threatening army, Richard has lost his powers, the Boxes of Orden are in play, and he has one year to find the way, Kahlan's fate is hanging in the balance as well. And what do we do for the first third of this book? Why, we watch Richard play sports, of course. Because why wouldn't we? This is kind of not why we're reading The Sword of Truth. Just sayin'. It is hideously dull, and so out of place. Not to mention the fact that a lot of the games described to us are eye-rollingly melodramatic.
Meanwhile, Zedd and Nicci have spent the entire first third of the book monologuing at each other about magic. Which is also not exactly entertaining either. Notice I do not say talking to each other. Neither of these characters is talking to anyone. They're just recordings set to repeat the same three or four lines off into infinity. They're not talking to one another. They're talking at one another, because neither of them hears a single word the other says. Neither of them listens. Neither of them reacts to conversation like a real human being would. They just keep bringing up the same points, over, and over, and over in big circular monologues that do about as much good as a dog chasing its own tail. Neither of them seem to be nearing any sort of point, as of yet. They're stuck in a repeated dialog loop about the Magic of Orden with no end in sight. Can none of these characters just, for once, spit out what they want to say in a single sentence without every other character in the room asking them to repeat that another 73 times just to make sure they got it? Cara did have one or two pretty good lines in there. She almost seemed like she was an outside observer, as I am, and having none of the repetition either.
Ha! There. I found a new way to say that this book is insanely repetitious. Because, honestly, I feel like I'm doing the exact same thing Goodkind is in bringing it up so often. But I can't not bring it up, (yes, I know that's a double negative. Sometimes bad grammar is a good way of adding emphasis, so long as it isn't used constantly... says the man who hasn't bothered to spell check or read back any of this to find all of the grammar and punctuation mistakes... =P) because it so permeates every single chapter of this book, that it's impossible to talk about what's wrong with it, without bringing up how much it constantly repeats itself. It is so pervasive that literally every single page of this book so far has fallen victim to it. It's a problem on such a deep and fundamental level of the way this book is written that it is constantly popping up, wherever you look. Honestly, I don't know how an editor would have fixed this. The entire book would ahve to be rewritten from the ground up. This is why editors are normally involved in the early stages of the writing process, to weed shit like this out before the book progresses to a point where it's impossible to fix. Someone either wasn't paying attention early on, or didn't care enough to even attempt the epic struggle of getting past Goodkind's ego to try and talk him into doing things a better way.
And while Zedd and Nicci are monologuing at one another, with the occasional amusing input from Cara just to brake (yes, I know I used brake instead of break. That was intentional.) up the insanity inducing monotony, Kahlan spends a great deal of time thinking about how she would really like trip that guy who she doesn't know (Richard) into her bed, because he's just so hot. Okay, I'm not going to say that there aren't women that shallow in the world. There are a lot more men that shallow, but that's another story. But come on, man. This is Kahlan. She's NOT that shallow. It's like Goodkind is trying to have it both ways. He wants Kahlan to have had her memory completely erased. And he wants her to be in love with Richard. Sorry, pal. You can have one or the other. You don't get both. And so, she does come off as pretty shallow here. If you eat your cake, it's not still sitting there on the table for you to have.
Basically, what the point of all this ranting boils down to, is that you can pretty much just remove the first 30% of this book and be all the better off for it.
60% done:
So, the conversation between Anne and Nicci... There is so much wrong with this single conversation that I don't even know where to start. I guess I'll go with character continuity. Anne is not Anne. Goodkind hand-waved this away two books ago by saying that since her memories of Kahlan are gone, so, too, is some of her character development. That could have been a very good way of illustrating what the world is like without Kahlan in it. BUT--and this is a VERY big but--you still have to remain consistant with the character she was BEFORE that particular piece of character development happened. This Anne IN NO WAY resembles the Anne from Stone of Tears, Blood of the Fold, and Temple of the Winds. She lacks the personality, the intelligence, and the general feel that this is, in fact, the same character.
Next, here's the thing about this entire conversation, we've already done this exact same conversation with Nicci and Cara back in Chainfire. The exact same ideas are expressed. The exact same conclusions are come to. And what makes this time even worse than being the exact same conversation happening again is that this is AFTER everyone has come to believe that Kahlan actually exists. This is a completely superfluous conversation that serves no purpose to story or character. It's just a rerun from a previous season to fill time in the schedule.
Next, Goodkind went into PAINFUL detail letting us know, earlier in the book, that since the Magic of Orden was created as a counter for Chainfire, and Nicci invoked that magic, she can now remember Kahlan. She can't remember details, or events surrounding Kahlan, but she can remember that she existed. This conversation, which takes place AFTER that event, conveniently forgets that fact. Nicci acts, thinks, and speaks as though she still cannot remember Kahlan, and still doubts that she even exists. You can't go into excruciating detail to tell me that she remembers, only to have her act, a few chapters later, that she believes LESS that Kahlan exists than she did at the start of the book!
Next, Anne was always against the boy wizards at the Palace of the Prophets indulging themselves with women. She says she always hated the practice, but too many of the other sisters believed it worked for her to abolish it. And here she is, upholding that idea as though she has firmly believed in it her entire life.
And finally, good god, would someone PLEASE tell Terry Goodkind that tension in dialog does not come from that dialog repeating 8000 times? PLEASE?!?!?
Jagang's treatment of Nicci seems a little out of character from the man we've seen in previous books. Yes, he is a brute that will beat and rape her. But the way he loses his temper over even the smallest things. Jagang has been portrayed as cold and calculating up to this point. A man with a temper that can still see reason and rein his emotions in easily. A man who does things for reasons, and doesn't let his emotions rule over him to the exclusion of good sense. Here he's just a rage fueled maniac that rants and screams, and can never think of any other way to solve problems or win arguments than ranting and screaming. This is not the same character that we've seen in previous books, and we've been shown no relevant character development for him to suggest that he's started unraveling and losing control.
80% done:
Okay, so, more sports. Whoopie. Don't care. Goodkind seems to be under the impression that this is entertaining, interesting, and engaging. It is not. Oh no, Richard's, uh, friend is a real strong word. Richard's acquaintance dies? But why! He was so........ there. To be honest, this guy was not a character. He was a loose collection of male stereotypes wrapped around a pile of expository dialog. And Goodkind expects me to give a crap when he dies? Nope. Sure don't. Damn, he was only two weeks from retirement, too. Why did he have to wear a red shirt that day and make those plans to go home and get married? Hasn't he seen ANY '80s action movies or '60s sci-fi TV series about a talking slab of ham in a uniform that was the source of an actual term used to describe a certain type of bad acting?
And now for something completely different. The next sequence in the story is genuinely great. It's a sequence of several action scenes with a few mystery solving and dialog scenes to break them up. It's well written, extremely well paced, and it all blends together into a very entertaining hundred pages or so. There are stakes to the action, characters we know and love die, other characters are captured and taken away, the action is well described, exciting and tense. There are several "FUCK YEAH!!!" moments. There is little to no repetition. It is a genuinely entertaining sequence of events spanning the beginning of the riot, to the Blood Beast attack. Why wasn't the rest of the book written like this? If Goodkind could craft such an enjoyable escape, why didn't he craft an enjoyable rest of the book?
So, Rachel's escape with the Box of Orden was, basically, completely pointless. Six steals it back with ease, and Rachel ends up back exactly where she was to begin with. What was the point? Oh, so Goodkind could put the Box of Orden into play for Richard? Seems a very thin excuse for wasting so much time on the storyline. He's shown no qualms in bending or breaking rules he's made about the way things work in his story before. Why didn't he just do it here, and have Nicci put the boxes into play fro Richard without needing one in her possession? It would have saved us Rachel getting from point A to point B, then point B back to point A. In other words, it was a lot of wasted space in the story for nothing of value.
And then Richard sits around and thinks about how his magic works. In excruciating detail. Remembering times it worked and times it didn't. And how he has no idea how to make it work most of the time. Which is then ruined by him immediately going and doing a bunch of magic from books he nad Nicci are studying. Uhuh. Setting aside the fact that we already freaking know how his magic works. We've had it repeated to us enough times that we damn well better. Stating that Richard doesn't know how to use magic, and then immediately showing him to be very comeptent in its use is pretty jarring and inconsistent.
The repetition and recaps rear their ugly heads here too. I've complained about these things so much, I think y'all get it by now. Just be aware that it's still happening, and it's still terrible.
100% done:
Okay, so, the last 40% or so of this book is actually pretty good. We go from that escape sequence after the riot Richard and jagang start into Richard trying to figure out how to win, and doing all of his prep work for opening a Box of Orden. Richard traveling to teh Underworld to retrieve all of the lost memories, getting attacked by the beast, and popping out back with the Mud People, then rushing off to Tammarang to get the book, find Kahlan, liberate a dragon, and fly back to the People's palace. And then, he completely owns Jagang and the Sisters of the Dark by outsmarting them like he did in the first book. I really liked that. Richard rarely wins on his own intellegence and abilities. He normally wins via Deus ex Machina, which is very unsatisfying. All of that is pretty good. There are a few patches where the writing grinds to a halt so that it can needlessly repeat itself, but the recaps of previous books in this section are actually relevant to the plot, so they get a pass. It's well paced. It has real dramatic tension. There is real emotion. Honestly, it's like night and day between this and the first half of the book. It actually feels as though it was written by a different person.
I do have to say that how Richard defeats the Blood Beast is really kind of lazy. The Blood Beast, in general, I think was just pretty lazy in its implementation from the beginning. It never seems like its a real threat, just a mild annoyance. It's almost like Goodkind had a great idea for a monster, and then couldn't figure out how to make it work with the story he wanted to tell, and so it just shows up in slow patches to move the story on to the next stage. It's almost like he felt like he couldn't be bothered to include the Beast in a more integral role to the plot, and set it on the back burner, then dispatched it with a an almost contemptuous ease. It was just a very lazy monster, used in a very lazy way, and defeated in an equally lazy way.
So, Jensen is here, because reasons, I guess. She doesn't really belong in this story, frankly, and including her in it, just because, seems a little distracting. Goodkind does nothing with her until the very, very end, and I'll get into that BS in a moment. She's been a completely superfluous character ever since her story ended, and she should have been left out of the rest of the series, in my opinion, because she adds nothing of value to the story in any way.
All right, now we get to the ending. I have always felt that Jagang's end was very fitting. The problem with it is that Goodkind pats himself on the back far too much during and afterward. Oh, he goes into excruciating detail on how amazing he is for having thought of it, and he rubs our faces in it until they're raw. He couldn't just have it happen, and then say nothing, which would have made it that much more powerful and memorable. No, he has to go on and describe what a genius he is for giving Jagang such a fitting end at great length. It really feels far too much like Goodkind taking a victory lap, and giving everyone in the stands the finger as he jogs by.
And then Richard opens the Box of Orden. I felt that this was actually very clever, having the key be the Sword of Truth, rather than any of the books. It kind of bookends the series, beginning with Richard recieving the Sword of Truth, and ending with him realizing what the sword's true purpose has always been, and using it for that purpose in the end.
And then the bullshit happens.
I have long called this ending one of the biggest cop outs in literary history. And it really is. Richard uses the power of Deus Ex Machina to take all of the people in the entire world that do not agree with him, and sends them to a completely different world, cut off from everything, including the afterlife. A protagonist is supposed to win by either utterly destroying the antagonist, in this case a set of beliefs, or convert the antagonist to his side. Richard does neither. He sweeps the problem under the rug and pretends it's gone forever, and starts singing "The Sun will come out Tomorrow". It's lazy. It's unsatisfying. And Goodkind takes this opportunity to preach like he's never preached before. I'm afraid that the simple fact that the world is not black and white utterly destroys all credibility this ending might have had. But Goodkind just doesn't seem to understand or care.
Continued in first comment.