Robert Adams' Horseclans novels are most commonly categorized as pulpy sci fi adventure, a la a post-apocalyptic variation on Sword & Sorcery fantasy. This reputation is undoubtedly informed by the short length of its entries, as well as those glorious, Frank Frazetta-esque cover illustrations, but I've come to realize that the series' pulpy affectations are merely skin-deep. Sure, there's a fair amount of gory action sequences, but those set-pieces sit alongside loads of historical minutiae and military planning. As such, it's probably more accurate to describe the novels as military fiction set within a fantastical, post-apocalyptic universe, and it's on Swords of the Horseclans where this alternative characterization becomes obvious. Although it's a direct continuation of its predecessor, Adams' focus on grounded politicking and strategizing is even more dominant this around. The end result is in no way poor, but it's bound to strike many fantasy fans as dry and somewhat aimless. A slightly disappointing follow-up to The Coming of the Horseclans.
Swords of the Horseclans is set approximately forty years after The Coming of the Horseclans. The nomadic horseclans, led by the immortal Milo Morai, have consolidated their control over Kehnooryos Ehlahs- a coastal kingdom located in what was once Virginia. Yet instead of peacefully coexisting with the pseudo-Greek Ehleenee inhabitants of the region, the rule of High Lord Morai is challenged by the remaining Ehleenee states. Much of what follows is an account of Milo's campaign against King Zastros- leader of the southernmost Ehleenee kingdom. Meanwhile, Milo's wife Mara remains in his capital and enters into a complex set of intrigues with King Alexandros of the Sea Islands. Eventually figuring into the story are the Witchmen- body-hopping descendants of pre-apocalypse scientists who are secretly behind the invasion of King Zastros. Apart from the Witchmen, the supernatural elements that punctuated The Coming of the Horseclans are incidental to the plot. In particular, the "mindspeaking" prairie cats of Adams' first novel are almost entirely absent.
I was impressed by the underlying premise of The Coming of the Horseclans, but was frustrated by Adams' awkward prose and felt that his storytelling could've been much tighter. Swords of the Horseclans succeeds in addressing only a subset of those concerns. In particular, when compared to its predecessor, Swords of the Horseclans is a far easier read yet moderately less entertaining. To the first point, Adams' prose is much improved, and he has cut back on the bizarre colloquialisms that stilted much of the dialogue on The Coming of the Horseclans. This is no longer the work of an amateur author, and Adams has clearly benefitted from better editing this time around. Sadly, his smoother writing style is counterbalanced by an even greater fixation upon inessential detail. Adams also continues his habit of info-dumping large amounts of plot via extended dialogue. Witness the "instructional" discourse between Milo and Mara near the end of the work. This tendency is made more frustrating by the fact that, although there's always something going on in, it doesn't feel like Swords of the Horseclans significantly advances the overall plot of the series. When only a handful of important events occur, none of those events should be recounted after the fact!
All of this makes Swords of the Horseclans a mixed bag. Apart from a handful of lengthy "history lessons", I mostly enjoyed myself while I was actually reading it. Yet when I finished the novel, I was left wondering whether it was time well spent. I will say that, given the novel's abrupt, semi-cliffhanger ending, I'm still intrigued to learn what happens in Revenge of the Horseclans. A strangely addictive quality that the rational part of my brain can't quite explain. I guess that's one thing that the Horseclans series has in common with the best of serialized, pulpy fiction…