The story: Saturday Afternoons
“Nena’s statement seemed like more of her usual nonsense”
Our impressions of events are often like this, a significant moment can be lost among our own points of view, our preoccupations in the moment, or the way a hot Saturday afternoon is endured inside the hermetically sealed world of a house locked up in unexplained grief or pain.
The actions of Nena, the younger sister of the narrator, perhaps around ten years old, open like a fracture in time that pinpoints the moment. The events themselves are minutiae, connected by time but each in turn take much re-organising to bring back together – like two atoms split – how do you fit them back together again – memory is like that too.
The events are:
Nena running across the garden screaming “Mama! Mama!” told to us half way through the story.
And the statement by her that opens the story like a witness statement:
“He was on a bicycle. Nena said. He wore a knotted handkerchief on his head. I saw him very well. He saw me too. He wanted something here at home. But he went by as if he couldn’t stop. It was exactly two o’clock.”
These two points anchor the story like dramatic highlights. But they are like punctures in time and space, like hearing a loud noise while snoozing away a Saturday afternoon. The rest is tame, languid, mysterious.
There is a mother, lost in a kind of daze throughout the story. Nena, off in her own make believe world acting out stories with her cat in a space she has organised for herself in the garden, the boy narrator, pre-occupied with improving his Latin over the summer to sit an extra exam, self-conscious about his mother, pretending not to be conscious about his sister. There’s Aunt Yvonne who visits every week until a scandal in Rome requires her husband to relocate to Switzerland and the order of the family’s universe is disrupted. There is an old gardener too, who can hardly do any work, but lives in the house anyway, as though it is his for life.
Where is the father? There might be a father. Or there might not be. It’s unclear. Perhaps that is the story, that the thing most important to the story cannot be mentioned for the sake of something else. He appears, only as a reference to a story about a holiday in 1941, at a villa with his wife (the mother) and her sister Yvonne. The owner of the villa we are told pretentiously makes out she is related to old aristocracy. The father was dressed in uniform, "the officer" he is called; it’s war time. We could guess the rest, perhaps we have to.
On first reading I struggled with this story. Like many Tabucchi works, they move with their own logic, the reader simply has to find it. I wouldn’t have read it if Sergio Pitol who I am reading mentioned it as superb in a memoir. Sergio adored Tabucchi. As do I; though I am not always sure why. Not everything on this earth operates by my own logic, so why should I appoint my own senses and reasoning as the organising principle to anything? So I needed Sergio to guide me here. We need people. Perhaps that is also Tabucchi’s approach: to work a little harder to understand those around us, a point he makes in other books, like the philosopher Spinoza who beckons us simply to love our neighbours.
Perhaps i should give it 5 stars.