I know a book is phenomenal when it elicits such emotions from me that I find myself "talking" to the book. That was this book. I probably should not have read this book, also, on the heels of the Casey Anthony verdict because I found myself really being angry, not only at the author of the book, but also the "reviewers" on the back cover. I must say I didn't know alot about this "story" from the start, as there are "true crimes" and miscarriages of justice which I have followed much more closely.
Do I think this man committed this crime? I honestly don't know. I know his DNA was found at the scene, but so were several other mens' DNA. He admitted to being at the victim's home. Well,yes, for consensual sex and this was a woman who admittedly had that type of relationship with married or unmarried men. Her prerogative, however, I am sure there was a line of people who really didn't cry when she was murdered. Sorry, I know it is a cold way to put it, but it does go to the title of the book. Was there inappropriate actions on the side of the jury? Hell, yes! However, and this is where I come to the cusp of my review, because this is where the book really irritated me, because the feeling that I got from the book was about the injustice of the jury system. When Casey Anthony was acquitted, we were forced to listen to defense attorneys basically telling outraged Americans to "suck it up" that is what is wonderful about our justice system. Well, here we are with a situation where, in my opinion, the defense team failed to do its' job for its' client in assessing potential jurors to exclude them...when the verdict failed to go their way, our justice system sucks. My question...which is it??
On a side note, I have to say that this book not only got the 5 star rating becomes of the emotions it ellicited out of me, but it is a well written book, as well. Def. an author I will continue to seek out.