Peter Elstob's Hitler's Last Offensive is one of the few works I have read that successfully stradles the boundaries of the operational mask of command and the bloody face of battle (to borrow from keegan). This is quite an achievement as Elstob avoids the historian's all too common pitfalls of becoming overly dry and detached or ponderously encumbered by heroic anecdotes. The high drama of war experienced in the 'Battle of the Bulge' is retained through detailed descriptions of ferocious small unit actions, yet these are integrated with tremendous ease into the eb and flow of the overall battle. Avioding sensationalist claims concerning the complete tactical and operational surprise achieved by the Germans, Elstob's orthodox history is rarely stale. Deftly planted sketches of key leadership personalities combined with the tangibles of confusion, desperation and frenzied combat maintain the momentum of the history.
Still there are noticable strategic weaknesses to Elstob's work. As a British soldier who fought in WWII he betrays marked sensitivity to the criticism leveled at British/Commonwealth command. Describing the ensuing battles around Caen as a deliberate plan to draw in and tie down German heavy armor while American spearheads broke out of the Cotentin Peninsula Elstob does little service to the reputations of the Commonwealth Generals. Rather these commander's breakout attempts in Operations Goodwood, Epsom and supporting missions suffered appaling losses, dissolving into bloody stalemates, punctuated by German ambushes in the bocage. He further glosses over the friction in Allied high command while making only passing reference to the failure of Operation Market Garden, which stripped mostly American units in southern France of supplies to grant priority to the overly ambitious British plan. It seems very odd to the reader that the described minor nature of the disagreements could lead to the Supreme Allied commander in Europe threatening to resign as the Battle of the Bulge hung in the balance. Further, while many just critiques can be laid at the door of General Patton, Elstob rather unfairly criticizes the slow advance of III Corps to relieve Bastogne despite the fact that these units were given a minimum of supplies as a result of the aforementioned Operation Market Garden. This to such an extent that only elments of those mobile forces were combat effective.
Despite the contextual weaknesses Elstob has achieved quite an exhausitve and engrossing work. Overall he attempts and succeeds to deliver due credit or blame with great equity.
--Dominic Petzling