This book, at a bare minimum, needed an editor. it was so badly written, it is hard to decide where to start, but here goes: perhaps most alarming is the fact that the author does not seem to understand the definition of a serial killer. If the book is entitled Great Lakes Serial Killers, one should be able to expect that it solely covers the stories of serial killers, and for the most part it did, yet some of the murderers were actually mass murderers, not serial murderers, and one was actually a murderer of one single person (wife was the sole victim). Next, there were times when he simply stated patently incorrect things--for example, John Norman Collins will never be eligible for parole (author stated that he has to serve a minimum of 26 years before he could be considered for parole). In reality, he was sentenced to life with NO possibility of parole.
Next, I need to point out that at times the author uses a word that makes no sense in the context of what he was writing about. There are too many of these to list, but one example was when he wrote that Jeffrey Dahmer "experimented with various spices and meat tenderizers in an effort to make the meat more palpable." I can only assume he was trying for the word "palatable."
Most sadly, the author offers no semblance of suspense or character development; it was as though he was more or less simply copying various facts from newspapers in an attempt to put full stories together, but the result was a series of clunky, redundant, stilted retellings. An example of this is a redundancy on page 91, where he says that Leopold and Loeb were "egotistical, and conceited, but the most descriptive term would be arrogant." Tell me what was conveyed through "arrogant," that the reader didn't already glean from "egotistical" or "conceited."
I could go on about the flaws in this book, but I think this much should be enough to warn potential readers, so caveat emptor, you have been warned.