A decent read but not nearly as compelling as the other biography I recently read about Emilie du Chatelet -- David Bodanis's Passionate Minds. Zinsser's research appears as deep as Bodanis's, but it seems the two biographers arrived at different conclusions after looking at the same evidence. Both agree that a great disservice has been done to Du Chatelet's memory in that she is most notably remembered as the great Enlightenment philosopher, Voltaire's, lover. Both agree that Du Chatelet was the not only a premiere intellectual mind among her own gender, but was one of the most brilliant minds of her generation, far exceeding Voltaire in her capacity to comprehend the most challenging questions of her time. Where the two biographers diverge the most in their conclusions comes at the end of Emilie's story, when describing her relationship with Jean-Francois de Saint-Lambert. Bodanis's description of Saint-Lambert in Passionate Minds has us believe he was a cad of the worst kind, one who led the passionate Du Chatelet to the brink of bliss, only to abandon her after she became pregnant. Zinsser on the other hand would have us believe that Saint-Lambert and Emilie shared a mutual passion, based on a deep-abiding love for the other evident by his devastation upon her death after giving birth to their daughter. The reader who prefers to believe in happy endings would certainly be content with believing Zinsser's telling of Chatelet's life, but for those who are more prone to suspecting Saint-Lambert's duplicity (for which Bodanis shows adequate proof), then Passionate Minds is more in line with what actually occurred between the two.
A fan of history, the study of Voltaire was what initially led me to discover and then study Emilie du Chatelet. What turned out to be a pleasant surprise was what I discovered -- Du Chatelet turned out to be the more compelling subject of the two. Both Zinsser & Bodanis are united in their opinion of Voltaire. History would have us believe that Voltaire was a one dimensional character; an enlightened philosopher, moral in his beliefs and deeds; a man of science and words -- the greatest of his day. Both Passionate Minds and Daring Genius compel us to see Voltaire in a more accurate light; a man of deep flaws, insecure and shallow; a hypochondriac who was capable of making himself ill when the world did not bend to what he perceived was right. When Voltaire met Du Chatelet, she quickly outpaced him in her ability to perceive and comprehend the intricate workings of the mind. Most likely, one of the greatest reasons for Voltaire's break from Emilie was based on his insecurity. Emilie came from an aristocratic lineage which most likely provided her with the confidence to persevere when life placed obstacles in her way. Voltaire, who came from a more humble background, seemed to struggle when he perceived the slightest hint of trouble. Both moved on with their lives after their love affair ended, but what remained was a bond that could not be broken. But, to remember Emilie Du Chatelet simply as Voltaire's lover is to lose the most important aspect of who she really was. Emilie Du Chatelet was a brilliant, passionate mind; a woman far ahead of her time.
Emilie Du Chatelet deserves to be studied. Zinsser's Daring Genius of the Enlightenment is a thorough biography. Zinsser delves into Emilie's mathematical and scientific findings, perhaps more than Bodanis, while taking more time on Emilie's life than Bodanis (who divides his time between Du Chatelet & Voltaire). With that said, I still believe Bodanis did a better job painting a more interesting, rounded picture of Emilie's life. I felt I came to know her on the pages of Bodanis's Passionate Minds. I would suggest the reader start with that book before moving onto Zinsser's biography.