The introduction by Martin was good, he really captured something about what I like so much about urban fantasy. He said it's the combination of mystery and horror that makes UF unpredictable and therefore keeps the readers turning the page to find out what happens next, where in traditional mystery, you know that it's probably the psycho who did it, or in horror it's probably the vampire. UF opens the door for a whole new mix of elements and outcomes and the creativity that it allows is a big part of what keeps me tuning in.
Format-wise, I really liked having the author bios before the stories. Most anthologies, if they have them at all, have them after the stories or at the end of the book, and I end up flipping around a lot because I like reading the information first. I like knowing who the authors are, if the story is a part of a series, etc. Plus, let's face it, anthologies exist to sell books, so why be coy with the information, put it out there so I can find it easily, don't make me hunt it down. I liked not having to go to my computer to look everyone up.
As for editorial variety, part way through the book I was pretty impressed with the choices, but by the end I was really frustrated. There was way too much historical fiction. I'm just not a fan and when almost half of the book is historical it's just too much. Just because it's different time periods doesn't make it variety, not if you aren't a fan of the concept. I didn't even read Roberts' and Denton's stories because by then I was just tired of the style, I'd reached my fill of trying new authors who's topics aren't what interests me anyway. With the expressed topic being anything PI and fantastic, I'd have liked to see more science fiction (2 stories) or even traditional fantasy (only 1), even though that isn't my favorite genre. Just more variety. It would have been a four-star book if I hadn't gotten too bored to read the last few historical stories.
Harris - It was typical Harris, she's written about this character in a few anthologies now and it isn't getting any more interesting. She just shoehorned her into the theme by having her investigate a crime. Harris sells books so she gets included in anthologies. It wasn't the worst story ever, but it wasn't special in any way.
Lansdale - This one had a lot of atmosphere, a good story. The first historical story in the book, it took place in the 1954.
Green - A typical John Taylor/Nightside story, it certainly fit the theme. The end was a bit abrupt.
Saylor - Normally I love history and facts worked into in my stories, but this was a series of lectures disguised as a story, disappointing considering how popular his books are. I don't know if it's because he's trying to squeeze so much into a short story or if his style changed for this prequel series, but it was really bad, more encyclopedia articles than story. It took place somewhere between 92-90 B.C.
Stirling - A very good story, solid writing, plot, all around very good. It made me want to read his books even though alternate history isn't normally my thing. (It wasn't history, it was actually one of only two sci-fi stories in the book.)
Vaughn - A decent story. I like Rick, but it wasn't really a mystery or PI story, it was just revealing things that he already knew. As you can see, this is a problem with authors who try to shoehorn existing characters and series into a themed book.
Iggulden - I didn't really see how this one fit the theme either, but it was a good story.
King - A terrific story, and the most successful in the anthology in making me want to order her books ASAP. Even though this was a sort of sci-fi story and her most famous books are a modern Sherlock Holmes homage, no connection, but storytelling is storytelling.
Cook - Another anthology success because I had the totally wrong impression about the kind of writer Cook is, I thought he wrote thrillers and was avoiding his books. This story was a bit frantic, perhaps because he was trying to introduce so much of what he's written about for 13 books into one short story. Often the more successful series authors do better focusing in on a supporting character for short stories in anthologies (see Briggs' story), but I liked the humor and variety of characters and will definitely be trying the series out. This was also the only traditional fantasy story in the book.
Snodgrass - A very fun story, she's a terrific writer, again anthology-in-action worked and I added some of her books to my high priority to-read list (the books that seem to be following this story with the paladin story line). I really liked his fear and vulnerability, it was such a different take on this very familiar character. The story takes place in 1932.
Hanover - This was a different anthology-in-action case, because I had a kind of bad impression of this author from the reviews I'd read of his new UF series. (Hanover is really a pen name for Daniel Abraham.) I've thought about trying the series a few times but I keep passing it up. But I liked this story. The end was a bit odd and I'm not sure I agree with how it was handled, but I did like the story and it's making me reconsider the series.
Tuttle - A good story, creepy and smart. Probably takes place in the early 1900s.
Gabaldon - It was very long. She's a good writer, but by this point I was getting tired of historical fiction and I only skimmed it. It's a good find for fans though, it's a substantial story. Takes place in Jamaica during the slave rebellions.
Roberts - Again, I was tired of historical fiction by now so I didn't even try it. This is in ancient Rome.
Briggs - An excellent story. This is the way to use characters from on ongoing series, focus in on a few supporting characters and let the narrow focus keep the scope from becoming too overwhelming for the short length of the story. This story should work equally well for fans of the series or new readers.
Denton - One last historical story, I just couldn't face it. This one was soldiers during WWII.