I had to read this for my psychological anthropology class, and at first wasn’t really into it because I generally prefer getting lost in fiction stories, but actually did end up enjoying how much this ethnography made me actively think about concepts related to reality, individuality, subjectivity, etc. Although my eyes definitely glazed over some of the pages that were describing anthro/psych concepts with overly complex language that anthropologists tend to use, overall I enjoyed the format of reading Tuhami and Crapanzano’s dialogue accompanied by analysis/reflection. I was also wary of reading this account just because of the long history of Western anthropologists entering communities to do research without thinking about potential damaging impact on the people they interact with + the tendency to treat the “other” as an object to study… Crapanzano was pretty honest and upfront about his own grappling with how his biases, background, situated realities, etc. impacted his perception of Tuhami’s life and also reflected a lot on the transference/countertransference that occurred between them which I did appreciate.
One of the biggest takeaways I have from Tuhami’s accounts is how they challenged my perception of time and reality. Our perceived realities are just based on certain systems of knowledge that we’ve been trained to uphold, and based entirely on the social environments we grew up in and surround ourselves with. Crapanzano talks about how he was constantly searching for what was “real” in Tuhami’s stories, which he equated with the “truth.” He believed the truth = the real covered with metaphors. But comes to realize that Tuhami was always speaking his truth, that the real was actually a metaphor for the true, and that the two were not identical. This was most clear in Tuhami’s interactions with saints, demons, and other non-human entities that he would describe in a way I perceived to be a “real encounter” with “real people” from my plane of reality, and while they were also real to Tuhami, from my perception of reality they would be considered imaginary… lots more to ponder here
Some quotes I want to remember-
“Saints and jnun enabled the articulation of reality an the expression of fantasy in a shared symbolic vocabulary that allowed the individual to transcend his embeddedness in immediate reality—to generalize his circumstances—and to take what solace he could from such transcendence”
“we cannot know completely the individuality of another”… every individual has a core individuality which cannot be recreated by anybody else/differs between everyone
“we should respect in the other the same mystery we expect others to respect in ourselves”