What do you think?
Rate this book


82 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 18, 1943
I am often surprised by other’s understanding of human motivation. I have heard argument’s that support a Freudian view of human behavior as determined; however, these same supporters always seem to claim that Sigmund Freud was wrong. Opposed to what many consider “the negative” view of human motivation Abraham H. Maslow’s presentation suggests that human motivation allows for a more positive interpretation.
The starting point for Maslow’s explanation begins with humanity’s need to achieve the basic satisfaction of that need prior to a desire arising from an additional need’s occurrence in awareness. Notwithstanding this explanation, Maslow indicates that the drives cannot be isolated as “every drive is related to the state of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of other drives (Maslow, 2013, p. 5). Further, Maslow explains that a theory of motivation is not synonymous with a theory of behavior. Whereas behavior is almost always motivated by an individual’s biological, cultural, and situational circumstances, motivation is only one of many aspects that determine it. As Maslow suggests, “there are many determinants of behavior other than needs and desires” (Maslow, 2012, p. 29).
Consequently, Maslow is attempting to construct a positive motivational theory that acknowledges the important role behavior has in the life of an individual. Additionally, Maslow is striving to ensure that known observational and experiential data is taken into account in presenting a functional theory that synthesizes previous contributions to the field by Goldstein (1939), Freud (1933; 1937), and Adler (1938). Maslow subjectively labels his contribution as a “general-dynamic theory” (Malsow, 2013, p. 6).
Conceptualizing the project, Maslow offers a framework, which later appears as a hierarchical triangle, only for the purpose of research and questions that the paper may raise in the future. The framework presented by Maslow suggests that basic needs must be met, in some fashion – not entirely, nor mostly – in order for the awareness of other needs to materialize. To understand this concept, Maslow explains that if an individual was lacking the basic needs of “food, safety, love, and esteem,” they would most likely be motivated by their hunger for food before the other needs (Maslow, 2012, p. 10). Additionally, when a certain need dominates, it impacts the entire future project of the individual. Contrariwise, when a want is satisfied, it is no longer a want by the individual. The claim is that a person will want the more basic need (e.g. water before food, food before love, etc.) if both are deprived. This culminates in Maslow’s suggesting that if all an individual’s basic needs unsatisfied, other needs are never even conceptualized.
An important aspect of the basic needs is that Maslow suggests that necessary preconditions must be present for fulfillment. Specifically,
Such conditions as freedom to speak, freedom to do what one wishes so long as no harm is done to others, freedom to express one’s self, freedom to investigate and seek information, freedom to defend one’s self, justice, fairness, honesty, orderliness in the group are examples of such preconditions for basic need satisfactions (Maslow, 2012, p. 23).
Looking at these suggested preconditions, it seems apparent that very few people would ever have the ability to rise above the basic needs. An equally intriguing aspect of the characteristics of basic needs is that Maslow never intended his list to be inclusive. This is important because many of the arguments against Maslow’s theory involve the understanding that it is a closed, complete hierarchal theory. This is not the case. In fact, Maslow explains that
It is true that most of the people with whom we have worked have seemed to have these basic needs in about the order that has been indicated. However, there have been a number of exceptions [emphasis added] (Maslow, 2012, p. 27).
After discussing the basic needs pertaining to physiological, safety, belongingness, and love, Maslow ascends towards a description of the higher needs of humanity; viz., the needs of esteem and self-actualization. Starting with the need for the self-esteem to achieve satisfaction, Maslow suggests that this is motivated by the desire for “self-confidence, worth, strength, capability and adequacy of being useful and necessary in the world” (Maslow, 2012, p. 20).
Next, Maslow explains the need for self-actualization. This need refers to the tendency of an individual to fulfill their potential. Or, as Maslow puts it, “[w]hat a man can be. He must be” (Maslow, 2012, p.20).
A particularly interesting aspect of Maslow’s thesis is to explain the need humanity has for causation. As Maslow suggests, people have a tendency to organize events in a way that gives them coherence and meaning. This tendency is an attempt to satisfy the fear of not knowing and is in part motivated by the basic need for safety. As an example, Maslow writes
Some neurotic adults in our society are, in many ways, like the unsafe child in their desire for safety… Their reaction is often to unknown, psychological dangers in a world that is perceived to be hostile, overwhelming and threatening. Such a person behaves as if a great catastrophe were almost always impending… His safety needs often find specific expression in a search for a protector, or a stronger person on whom he may depend… (Maslow, 2012, p.17).
A popular criticism of Maslow’s theory is that it is ethnocentric. However, this criticism was already recognized by Maslow, as indicated in the text that ”[c]ertainly in any particular culture an individual’s conscious motivational content will usually be extremely different from the conscious motivational content of an individual in another society” (Maslow, 2012, p. 30). Moreover, Maslow explains that “No claim is made that it [A Theory of Human Motivation] is ultimate or universal for all cultures” (p. 31).
Ultimately, I enjoyed reading this book. I think Maslow’s presentation meets the intended goal viz. to forward a positive theory of motivation which conforms to the known facts about human behavior.
Happy Reading!
"Few psychological essays have stood the test of time with as much clarity and cultural relevance as Maslow’s A Theory of Human Motivation. This foundational work didn’t just propose a theory — it redefined how we view human needs and purpose."
A Theory of Human Motivation, originally published in 1943 in the journal Psychological Review, is not a book in the traditional sense but a landmark essay that laid the groundwork for one of the most enduring concepts in psychology: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Abraham H. Maslow, a humanistic psychologist, proposed that human behavior is motivated by a series of hierarchical needs — progressing from basic physiological requirements to higher psychological aspirations such as self-actualization.
The article is written with remarkable clarity and simplicity, even as it touches on deep philosophical and psychological themes. Maslow’s tone is scientific yet accessible, making the work readable to students, researchers, and laypersons alike. His primary assertion is revolutionary in its elegant framing: people are not solely driven by external stimuli or subconscious urges but by a structured series of internal needs — one building on another.
The hierarchy consists of five levels of human needs:
Maslow emphasized that lower-tier needs must be relatively satisfied before higher-level motivations can emerge. Importantly, this hierarchy is dynamic, not rigid; individuals may oscillate between levels depending on life circumstances.
Maslow’s essay has had a profound impact on academic psychology and the humanities, generating decades of discourse and derivative models. The concept of a needs hierarchy has influenced:
"A Theory of Human Motivation doesn’t just explain human needs — it offers a framework for human dignity."
Though over 80 years old, Maslow’s A Theory of Human Motivation remains a cornerstone of psychological literature. While some of its assumptions have been challenged or recontextualized, its essential insight — that humans strive not merely to survive, but to thrive — continues to resonate.
For students of psychology, sociology, education, or leadership, this essay is essential reading. Its ideas may be simple on the surface, but they continue to inform how we understand the deepest drivers of human behavior.
A Theory of Human Motivation is not just an academic milestone — it’s a philosophical mirror that reflects what it means to be human. Clean, clear, and quietly revolutionary.