Seidl argues for humanity to embrace the ethic of adaptation while continuing to work to reverse climate change. Good conversational points, though there's a lot more to be said and worked out in adaptation in urban areas and for folks who are already pressed and stressed in basic survival, who are already adapting a great deal, and might not have access to some of the resources that will allow for climactic adaptation.
The one chapter I found really troubling was the one on self-reliance. Emerson wasn't self-reliant and neither was Thoreau. They lived in a community of people, supported in great part by the efforts of others. Yes, even while Thoreau lived at Walden. He ate regular meals with his friends, relied on things he brought with him, not least of which is the wisdom of what he had learned in community. The American ideal of self-reliance has been destructive of real communities and encouraged a self-regard that leaves the good of others out. People need each other and healthy biodiversity includes the interdependence we share with each other and the different gifts each of us has. If we're truly going to adapt, yes, we can't be primarily consumers, we also have to be creators, but we need to be creating together, sharing generously, and moving past a world measuring human value by either transactions or the ability to withhold participating in the whole.
Still, adaptation is before us all.