THE FIVE STAGES OF COLLAPSE: SURVIVOR’S TOOLKIT by Dmitry Orlov
This is potentially an important book. The US is now in a period of decline with the usual signs of this decline, most especially an increasing and desperate need to reclaim what are perceived to be past glories, now lost by a series of imaginary scapegoats – gays, immigrants - legal or illegal – who are “not like us” and “too different,” “dangerous,” and all the other hob-goblins of “others” to blame. And we must return to these perceived glories, to “Make America Great Again,” by taking America “back to when America was America,” although how far back is never specified. 1950? 1920? 1860? 1692??? No matter – somewhere around “there” when America was “Great.”
Dmitry Orlov, who was born in the Soviet Union and whose family was allowed to emigrate – that is, thrown out to avoid contaminating the “perfect” Soviet state with “dangerous” ideas, spent his teen years and most of his life thereafter in the US. Thus, Orlov has the benefit of experiencing two different countries with rather different whole “systems.” Plus, he had traveled extensively. Orlov uses this experience, plus more, to discuss collapse as a process, viewed from the perspectives of social, and other, scientists.
Orlov claims that collapse occurs in 5 phases or stages, financial, commercial, political, social, and cultural; at this time we become some sort of sub-animal, a creature with more skills but fewer scruples than hyenas, jackals, snakes, and so on. By this stage, every human is a confirmed sociopath, not just politicians and venture capitalists. Orlov describes the failed condition and mentions a few remedies that the reader might consider to avoid personal disaster and death.
At the end of each major chapter there is an actual example that illustrates the particular phase. In the same order as the stages, the examples are: Iceland (which rebounded in a way the US, the UK and others did not and could not because of the problem of scale), The Russian Mafia, The Pashtuns, The Roma (Gypsies), and Colin Trumbell’s Ik of East Africa.
Orlov warns us not to rely on the usual institutions with one exception –religion. Otherwise he suggests that organization on the local level is the key to survival – in decreasing order of reliability – the extended family (three generations with a patron or madrona at the head; the nuclear family is insufficient), other relatives, neighbors, inter-neighborhood alliances. Other than that, others must win your trust before engaging in relationships – verify, then trust. He concedes nations are good at some things, mostly infrastructure. I worry about other things nations do best, like research, medical assistance, disaster relief, etc. Banks ought to be eliminated. Religion is a great organizer if it doesn’t become too powerful and a monopoly.
In one of the many asides, Orlov notes that English is an incomplete pidgin and/or creole, with a simplified (Saxon ??) grammar and replacement of most of the original words with Norman French words. BTW, he also notes that most of the Romance languages are creole languages, starting out as Pidgin Latin adapted to local languages, then expanded to form a proper creole language. As a second shot, he notes that English orthography is “a set of idiosyncratic renderings,” undoubtedly reminding us of the “cough/through/though” conundrum (and many other idiosyncrasies) that makes English into a letter-based pictographic system in which each word’s pronunciation is not immediately apparent from the spelling; other languages do better and are thus more efficiently and rapidly learned. Given this incompetent orthography and with the spread of the Internet, “Broken English” is becoming the international language.
The book is a long slog – 364 pages of small print and rapid-fire ideas, a few of which are referenced like a good scholar, but most are not. It took a while to read it, but it was worth the effort. I found that I might be an anarchist like the author, but with a number of caveats. A warning – the book can be a tad depressing. After reading it you will want to read something lighter, something like Capote’s “In Cold Blood.”