Peter Bauer, a pioneer of development economics, is an incisive thinker whose work continues to influence fields from political science to history to anthropology. As Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen writes in the introduction to this book, "the originality, force, and extensive bearing of his writings have been quite astonishing." This collection of Bauer's essays reveals the full power and range of his thought as well as the central concern that underlies so much of his diverse the impact of people's conduct, their cultural institutions, and the policies of their governments on economic progress.The papers here cover pressing and controversial issues, including the process that transforms a subsistence economy into an exchange economy, the reputed correlation between poverty and population density, the alleged responsibility of the West for Third World poverty, the often counterproductive results of foreign aid, and the effects of egalitarian policies on individual freedoms. Bauer addresses these and other matters with clarity, verve, and wit, combining his deep understanding of economic theory and methodology with keen insights into human nature. The book is a penetrating account of how to develop a prosperous economy alongside a free and fair society and a stimulating introduction to the work of a man who has done so much to shape our modern understanding of developing economies and of the relationship of economics to the other social sciences."This selection of essays will give readers a wonderful opportunity to learn about the rich world of cognizance and analysis erected by one of the great architects of political economy. I feel privileged to be able to offer this letter of invitation."--From the introduction by Amartya Sen, Nobel Laureate in economics
A good essay on Western Guilt and Third World Poverty. Bauer argues that those third world countries which have had no contact with the West are poor and undeveloped e.g. Afghanistan, whereas the colonised have by and large benefitted. The British stance of limited government changed during the 1940s leaving the newly independent countries with a basic structure which allowed the incoming governments the ability to increase regulation, tighten controls, and restrict imports so limiting investment.
The essays of a pioneer in development economics, Peter Bauer, are gathered together in this edition. For the economic illiterate, this book may be a struggle, but Bauer forgoes the dependence on mathematical models that much of contemporary economics relies on and gets to the point with clear historical and cultural references. Bauer tackles the hot topics of development economics from a free market perspective, challenging the effectiveness and motivations behind foreign aid and what a developing country requires to escape poverty. He thoroughly dismantles the premise that more land and/or resources are necessary, pointing to smaller and resource-poor economies like Hong Kong, Venice and Switzerland as vibrant and productive counterexamples. He challenges the notion of per capita income, pointing out that population increases relative to capital accumulation would decrease that number, but as wealth is not stagnant and not fixed, population growth does not have to be feared. He eviscerates the concepts of Western guilt and social justice, including those pushed by Pope Paul VI, and points to wealth creation and economic mobility as the future of development. If read with an open mind, which Amartya Sen, Bauer's former student and Nobel Laureate deigned to do, simple but often dismissed economic principles are argued clearly and evidenced in these essays. A must-read for any student of economics or politics. The book's main drawback is that Bauer's essays date primarily from the 1970s and 1980s, so an updated telling of the same stories would be useful.
I give this book a weak four stars. The content at the very beginning was great. There are a few parts that were a little more confusing. That is only because he takes a whole chapter, which was fairly long, and dedicates it to rebutting an economist that I've never heard of or read. Granted, the majority of the book is rebutting. I also found the chapter against egalitarianism a little weak. I don't think it would be able to convert anyone to non-egalitarianism. Nevertheless, the rest of the book is phenomenal. It takes on the many myths in economics and I think it takes them on superbly. He gives many, many real world examples like Hong Kong, India (which at the time of the writing was in very bad economic shape). Great Britain, and many more. The complaints about it being outdated, while true, I think are unwarranted. The points that Bauer tries to make are confirmed through the examples he gives. They do not require further elaboration. That being said, I do admit it would be very helpful if there was some new examples to show being that the there is a new interest in this debate because of the great recession.
Conservative critique of foreign aid, but without contempt or narrow particularism. Emphasised cultural barriers and institutional weakness as a lone voice during the hegemony of Rostow's capital-only fairytale.
Great read and quite informative but may come off as condescending to a biased mind. Overall enjoyed reading it but I didn't agree with some of the points raised.