This is one of the most amazing books on Japanese history that I have ever read. Let me tell you why.
When did the British start to think of themselves as belong to a nation, thus entering/achieving modernity? Long story short, the answer is the moment they had to consider whether they were the same kind of people with the Indians. In other words, the flow of influence between the metropolis and the empire had never been uni-directioned, with "modern" institutions from the mother country imported to the colony. In fact, empire building held as much influence on the metropolian society, sometimes keeping it hostage.
Louise Young argues in her book that for Japan, Manchuria is India for British. Empire building had been a project, sometimes even sparked by supply-demand and by the historicity of the moment. Manchuria had been a "total empire", the way World War II was a "total war" - a hybrid of war front and home front. The making of Manchuria took place not only in the colony itself, but also within the heart of Japan. In the end, as Young concluded in the last sentence of the final chapter: Manchukuo the empire was the answer that the Japanese came up with to deal with the dilemma of modernity - of becoming a nation in the age of mass media and mass politics.
Each chapter, except for the first and the last, focuses on a site of the imperial project, and as such delivers a compelling story on how Manchuria became that imagined paradise in the minds of the metropolitan. Several important themes were woven in, and of course I would recommend actually reading the book rather than browsing through any kinds of theme summary.
And then, there are also important areas that the book never gets to discuss. For example, the imperial project of British India heavily involved religion, and Manchuria of course did not escape the same mechanism. But that area in itself could have already become an enourmous book, so let's hope that the author might follow up with the issue one day. Or better, if a book has already emerged about that subject, please recommend me.
And, for those of you who might now know, this book falls into the category of social/cultural history - which arguably is the most enjoyable type of history for a casual reader. So why not pick it up?