I saw the recent Cruella film twice and enjoyed it so much that I wanted to experience it yet again, but I had already gone to the movies to see it twice and wasn't about to pay $30 for Premier Access on Disney+ to watch it, so I opted to read Elizabeth Rudnick's novelization of the film. I sadly did not much enjoy it, which surprised me because I have read other novelizations that Rudnick has written such as A Frozen Heart (a novelization of Frozen) and Maleficent, and I especially enjoyed A Frozen Heart, which I thought was very beautifully written. Cruella, however, is, for the most part, very blandly written without much description. (You, in fact, really need to have seen the film to properly visualize much of anything.) Although this changes at times, there overall isn't a whole lot of insight offered regarding characters' inner thoughts, and in fact, I think that Rudnick does a better job revealing the Baroness Von Hellman's psyche than she does Cruella's, and that doesn't make much sense to me because the title of the movie/book is Cruella. Rudnick also overuses the word said to describe dialogue. Rarely does anyone ever whisper, mutter, scold, cry, argue, etc.; instead, they simply say things, which makes for, as I said, very bland writing. I was also looking forward to reading the novelization for an explanation of the robe that Cruella wears in the movie to which she sets fire, causing it to simply disintegrate and disappear, but there isn't one. There is a rather weak description of that scene as it happens, but there is absolutely no insight offered as to how Cruella managed to pull that off, an example of what I mean when I say that very little insight about the characters' mindsets (especially Cruella's) is offered. What is especially frustrating about this novelization, however, is the very minor changes that Rudnick makes to the plot which are not only wholly unnecessary but also, most of the time, problematic because they create inconsistencies and plot-holes that are not present in the film. The first major one that I noticed happens right near the beginning of the book - a change that creates a completely unnecessary plot-hole that is later addressed by very lazily being swept under the rug. Another inconsistency is when Cruella does not seem to recognize Anita Darling at the Black-and-White Ball but then soon after knows exactly who she is when she visits her at her worksite. One final example that I will offer is one that I will actually quote directly: "As he [Jasper] watched, Horace put one hand over his eye and looked back at a new dog and owner as they sauntered past as if that might give him a new perspective" (Rudnick 170). I don't want to give too much away in case anyone reading this hasn't seen the movie or read this novelization, but that is not why Horace put one hand over his eye, and Jasper knew that that wasn't why. It's a completely unnecessary change that takes away from that scene because the real reason why Horace did that is actually supposed to be funny, and I - to be perfectly honest - was tempted to stop reading at that point, but I didn't because I was already more than halfway through, so it seemed silly to stop at that point. There is another Cruella novel that takes place in this universe titled Hello, Cruel Heart. Written by Maureen Johnson, it is an original story that, to the best of my knowledge (although I could be wrong), delves into a time period that is skipped over in the film - Cruella's teen years. I am looking forward to reading that, hoping that it is better than this. (If, by any chance, you are reading this, Ms. Rudnick, I apologize for my harsh words, but, as I said, having read and adored A Frozen Heart, I know that you're more capable than this.)