Spotlighting news articles, historical accounts, and first-person interviews, this chronicle of human interactions with monsters will convince even the most hardened skeptic of the existence of the bogeyman, bigfoot, werewolves, and swamp creatures.Offering an array of wild reports―from the police officer who begrudgingly responded to a call about a longhaired woman flying over a suburban neighborhood only to find himself calling for backup when she attacked his patrol car to the motorist whose headlights illuminated a seven foot tall, wolflike creature that stood on its hind legs―this historical record highlights scary and unbelievable narratives.From slightly demented humans to spinetingling paranormal encounters, each outlandish occurrence is detailed with thorough research and recounted with a storyteller's crafted voice.
I took my time reading this book. I would read a chapter and then go to something else for a while before I'd come back and read another chapter. I think this is the way you should read this book. I really enjoyed it this way. I didn't realize this was a non-fiction book when I picked it up to read. Then because it was non-fiction it became more interesting and also hearing all the first hand accounts from normal people.
I'll be honest now: I got two-thirds of the way through the book and just skimmed the rest. Because it was just terrible.
Even, mind you, even for a book on crazy things that people believe even though they0 are silly, it was still terrible.
Here's why:
a) You don't need a line break AND an indentation at the beginning of every paragraph;
b) Paragraphs should, generally speaking, strive to be more than a single sentence a piece;
c) Pics or it didn't happen.
Now Sean, I hear you say, it is a book about widely-believed but totally unverifiable supernatural phenomena, how can you expect the author to include pictures?
Well now sir, sirree, sirrah, there are hundreds of 'photographs' of UFO's, Bigfoot, and all sorts of other things that Mr. Steiger could've included here. But no, what did he choose instead? Poorly done cartoons, and photos from iStock. YUP.
Okokok, I may be being too harsh with the photographs things, I mean, who wants to fill their book with blurry, half blackened pictures of what could be UFO's but are probably street lamps? I get it, you make a fair point. BUT, I say, BUT for the WHOLE CHAPTER ABOUT SNAKES. Snakes. Real snakes! Snakes that both exist in real life, AND are widely photographed and documented. I mean, for pity's sake he spends the first three pages of this chapter talking about the Burmese Python and the Anaconda.
I'll EVEN make this concession, so nobody can say I'm not being fair. But if you aren't going to have any photos of ANY of these supernatural creatures/experiences/phenomena, then at least do us the courtesy of not WASTING OUR TIME WITH DISCUSSIONS OF FAMOUS PHOTOGRAPHS YOU WON'T EVEN LET US SEE, THANK YOU.
This is a pretty comprehensive (read really, really long) guide to scary stuff. It covered quite a wide variety of topics like bogey men and headless horesmen and aliens and werewolves. Some of it was really interesting, some of it not.
I did enjoy this book even though at times it read more like an encyclopedia. Some more real pictures would have been nice, even if they were a bit blurry and ill defined. The numerous drawings seemed ridiculous at times and more like something that belonged in a 1950's pulp magazine or something.
It was a okay read. Some chapters were repeated later on and could of been combined with previous chapters. The artwork was very good, but the details were matching the artists style, not the descriptions given by witnesses.