Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Video Game Theory Reader 2

Rate this book
The Video Game Theory Reader 2 picks up where the first Video Game Theory Reader (Routledge, 2003) left off, with a group of leading scholars turning their attention to next-generation platforms-the Nintendo Wii, the PlayStation 3, the Xbox 360-and to new issues in the rapidly expanding field of video games studies. The contributors are some of the most renowned scholars working on video games today including Henry Jenkins, Jesper Juul, Eric Zimmerman, and Mia Consalvo. While the first volume had a strong focus on early video games, this volume also addresses more contemporary issues such as convergence and MMORPGs. The volume concludes with an appendix of nearly 40 ideas and concepts from a variety of theories and disciplines that have been usefully and insightfully applied to the study of video games.

456 pages, Kindle Edition

First published January 1, 2008

3 people are currently reading
110 people want to read

About the author

Bernard Perron

15 books9 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
11 (29%)
4 stars
11 (29%)
3 stars
13 (35%)
2 stars
2 (5%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Victoria.
285 reviews
December 17, 2017
Gracias a este libro aprendí muchísimas de las cosas que incluí en mi tesis de licenciatura. Temas muy bien explicados.
Profile Image for MJ Nicholls.
2,254 reviews4,787 followers
July 4, 2011
This compendium is essential reading for all aspiring game theorists, tackling video games from a range of angles—psychology, market analysis, narratology, education, the whole caboodle—with an accessible range of academic papers and reports.

The focus is, naturally, on academic work, but the best academic writing presents itself in a readable way, shushing the poindexters and pleasing the populace. Academic writing should aspire to be as fluid as the best non-fiction work, and the best papers here do. Those authored by research teams or groups are the worst: smothered in technical language of no interest to those outside research facilities. Boo to them.

I shouldn’t have read the whole thing but what can I say, I’m getting into the topic. Let a man show a little passion from time to time.

* For those reading this review with actual game theory expertise, I am a visitor to this topic, reading these texts to absorb the debate. So pardon my piddling review.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.