MUST READ. Many people eating meat would rather not find out how the animals are killed and processed. Likewise, we all enjoy affordable products manufactured or assembled in China, but few of us have much understanding of precisely what people do to provide these billions of products at such low prices to our big name brands and distributors. The overwhelming human sacrifices and environmental damages often concealed to achieve these low prices is haunting. That said, the work has provided incomes to raise a lot of people out of poverty.
Alexandra Harney did an awesome job investigating and researching for this book. Although it was written prior to the global economic downturn, this book still is pretty current with a comprehensive analysis. Her writing is informative, colorful, thought-provoking, and objective. She did a superb job seeking out the right people and asking the right questions. I enjoyed reading about the people she interviewed and in some cases followed around. These people included an illegal coal miner in Shanxi, a factory girl in Guangdong, two different impressive "model" factory managers, Zhang Yisheng and Yin Guoxin, a self-taught lawyer Zhou-Litai who became a celebrity winning payouts for workers, as well as representatives of major brands such as Wal-Mart, Reebok, Adidas, Timberland, VF, GAP, Levi Strauss, and analysts, such as Jason Kindopp and Daniel Rosen, at various think-tanks and advisory firms.
Some of our big name brand corporations actually have increased costs by sending inspectors to audit factories for health and safety, but the big name brand corporations still seek the lowest prices, thereby prompting the competing factories to agree to terms so low they are impossible to meet without secretly compromising health and safety at other undisclosed locations. China's government in Beijing has passed some pretty good labor laws and health and safety laws, but due to the structure of China's local political economy, Chinese people's shared drive for more money combined with Western corporations drive for the lowest prices, many laws are commonly not enforced at the local level.
Managers of factories are exceedingly competitive. In order to stay competitive and not lose contracts, they must lie to safety and health inspectors, pay bribes, or cut any number of corners. They do it to stay afloat and make money. Many factory managers argue that if they don't cut corners, their competitors will--to win the contracts--because Western brands seek the lowest prices.
Implementing and enforcing a sound set of regulations has been an uphill battle. A significant portion of the factory owners and local government officials ignore environmental, labor, and health and safety laws, in order to get more money, either by achieving higher GDP for their area, or higher profits for their business, or by receiving bribes to supplement their salary.
Chinese judges and courts, with government backing, have been increasingly awarding plaintiffs more compensation to pressure small factory owners to better adhere to health and safety standards. Also, NGO groups have succeeded in better informing migrant workers of the Chinese laws. There have been improvements.
Nonetheless, migrant workers continue to accept the most dangerous jobs in the most unhealthy conditions, often at small, unofficial, hidden facilities monitored by no one at all. Rural, migrant workers, limited by the hukou system, sacrifice everything out of necessity and/or ignorance.
Yet the costs extend far beyond the individual family lives of the migrant workers. In aggregate, the health care costs and the environmental damage is enormous.
People thought they could save tons of money by moving factories to China and asking for the lowest prices. And the Chinese, eager to earn more money, agreed to do the work for the impossibly low prices. In order to achieve results when the costs exceed the prices, people obviously were lying or falsifying documents at one point or another.
Just like borrowing on a credit card or taking a mortgage on a house, we can enjoy immediate gratification while pushing the costs to a later day, again and again, but eventually those costs will mount and bear down on all of us who initiated the original off-setting act.
For the last 30 years, we've been in a position to get the Chinese to manufacture products at impossibly low prices, and they have done it. And now that so many products are manufactured or assembled there, the Chinese are increasingly in a position to ask our government, corporations, and organizations to help them pay for the environmental and worker health care costs.
Alexandra Harney concludes that responsibility for the hidden costs of "the China price" seems to be shared equally between the consumers of the world and the government of China. "Although Beijing drafts policy, it has traditionally left enforcement of these policies to local governments... China is also realizing the downside of its historic reliance on local governments to enforce policy and is trying to bring more power back to the center... One question is whether Beijing can move away from a system where local governments compete to have the least stringent law enforcement and rack up economic growth, to one where the laws are enforced more evenly and social and environmental objectives gain greater priority... Ultimately the only way to lessen the social and environmental cost of the China price is for the Chinese government to do more. The labor contract law, and to a lesser extent, the promotion of CSR (corporate social responsibility) are steps in the right direction. But more laws and policies are not the answer. Enforcement of existing laws is."
Alexandra Harney emphasizes that the answer is eliminating collusion between local government officials. Widespread enforcement of the laws has been lacking at the local government level throughout China due to economic incentives to look the other way. She says, "Law enforcement cannot be a token gesture...Without better law enforcement, China will have to continue to contend with the political and economic consequences of rising labor activism, worsening pollution, a mounting health care bill and a widening income gap."
This book is relevant to all of us, and even more so for those studying or working in manufacturing, marketing, management, human resources, labor relations, human rights, government policy, politics, labor law, occupational health and safety, environment protection, journalism, and international trade.
China's sustainable competitive advantage for attracting multinationals is not going to be low labor costs. Instead it's going to be their production capacity, specialized local infrastructure, and manufacturing expertise, which enhance the speed, convenience, and quality of manufacturing to export. The Chinese advantage is in its highly concentrated factory clusters in export zones, which already have major transportation hubs and shipping ports. Besides leveraging economies of scale, these factory clusters in China increase their efficiency (faster lead times) and quality of production by working with neighboring dependent businesses that efficiently service the factories with parts, machinery repairs, materials, ready transportation, etc. In effect, the entire supply chain is clustered together. China's highly concentrated factory clusters, which in some instances may manufacture or assemble a larger proportion of the products than anywhere else in the world, make it difficult for other countries to provide comparable infrastructure that is equally specialized, even when those countries undercut Chinese labor costs.
China's government leaders aim to switch its economy from labor-intensive export industries to more innovative and higher value-added industries and more domestic consumption. The government has run pilot insurance programs for urban residents and pilot health care programs for rural residents, to encourage lower savings and higher consumption.
Improving China will also require additional government investments in environment, health and safety. The management consultancy AT Kearney estimated that upgrading China's food safety system (standards, training, transport, warehousing) will cost $100 billion.
The government is removing incentives for energy-intensive and heavy polluting industries and providing new incentives for high tech. industries. This will require more creativity and domestic business development by China's engineers and university graduates. The government, however, has been concerned about high unemployment among recent university graduates. Every year, 15 million more people will need jobs.
The consultant Daniel Rosen added that China has lacked a history of judicial interpretation, which is necessary to provide the businesses producing higher value-added goods with a more predictable legal system.
The 1.3 billion people of China face some enormous challenges but should have a bright future.