'Taste’ has long has a problematic place in cultural analysis – not quite the rigour of design, a bit middle brow, and all very moral. Here, in an intriguing and at times unsettling book, Penny Sparke explores taste as gendered (feminine) and derided by the strictures of design (gendered masculine) and by the high priests of quality. Dealing primarily with modernity, Sparke traces the period from the early 19th century to depict a see-sawing struggle between the rules of good design, and the practices of good taste. She sees ‘taste’ as being understood to corrupt and dilute ‘design’, and suggests that there is little chance of ‘feminine taste’ winning its battle with ‘masculine design’ for the lived environment, even in the flexible, anything-goes, world of postmodern design. On balance, I’m not really sure what to make of it – she certainly has an idiosyncratic and iconoclastic view of design/material culture history which I quite like, but there is little about the analysis that seems to inspire change – it is almost as if I got to the end and wondered so what, how do we deal with this? I suspect that part of the problem is that in looking to write accessibly (a good thing) she has finished up in places seeming to accept the essentialist view of taste=woman, design=man leading to a conclusion that is must be an unresolvable, irreconcilable struggle. Still, thoroughly worth the read.