A fine work on a largely unexplored topic, it nevertheless comes across as more of a paen to the author's alma mater, Yale. Granted I have no direct knowledge of the situation but it seems to me that the liberal establishment of the mid-20th Century would have multiple hubs of activity and not be as exclusively Yale-centric as the author leads us to believe. On the other hand, if my suspicion is mistaken perhaps the author could have addressed the matter and explained why such a natural suspicion isn't so. Of course, maybe the book is meant to focus specifically on the liberal establishment AT YALE which would be fine if that were reflected in the title. I guess that's my ultimate problem with the work: the title is quite misleading.