Moments of brilliance off-set by ramblings of a mediocre author.
I'm too lazy to write a novel, but I read and beta-read quite a lot, so that's bound to make one curious. This self-help book for floundering first-time writers adresses the important and often neglected topic of how to actually finish a book. Yes, yes, everyone has a (sometimes terrible) novel inside of them, and some people can even write well, but how do you translate your briliant idea not only into a first riveting chapter but to an entire book without getting distracted, losing hope or starting to hate your own book?
Stephen King, writer of many bestsellers, never adressed this topic in his famed "On Writing" which propagates that nearly everyone can write competently when they use the English Grammar correctly. This point wasn't very enlightening to me, so I decided to pursue the topic further.
Roz Morris is a ghost writer of what I believe to be mediocre main stream fiction. She clearly isn't brilliant (to be fair, I don't believe King to be brilliant either and he calls himself "competent", which must be true), but quite structured. Being structured is of course in many ways better than being brilliant, as brilliant might be an idea but structure gets the job done.
Morris has a few strong points which commend this book:
- she motivates the potential writer
- she points out possible grievings and doubts and how to overcome them
- she gives reasonable advice on how to slog through
- her "games" that create and double check structure are helpful and seem like they would save A LOT of time (I would recommend getting the book for that alone)
However, there are some drawbacks in the book that a writer should be aware of:
- Morris, like King, is an advocate for mediocrity. Her work caters nearly exvlusively to writers of second or third rate fiction, while ignoring that even good writers might profit from structure. In fact, brilliant writers often suffer from terrible writer's block or make some pacing mistakes that are overlooked for the sake of the masterpiece of prose it is. Adapting this book to the needs of a really talented author might be a little harder and warrants ignoring some well-meant but silly advice meant for writers who aren't competent enough to break rules.
- the examples given in the book make Twilight look like a brilliant book
- Morris seems to believe that a third person omniescent narrator isn't legit, which is bullshit. 3rd person Omni might not be en vogue right now, but it exists and Dumas made a beautiful job of it in his works.
- the part on revisions is features redundant advice like "check the facts, timeline, grammar" which should be obvious to eberyone in possession of a brain
- while Morris introduces the Beat sheet, which isn't half-stupid, the potential writer is left alone to flounder away with all other aspects of revision, with about fifty pages of the book telling me to do this, do that, but not how to make it smarter/less time intensive.
In short, Morris has a well-structured system for the first draft. It's fool-proof and anyone could follow this system and come out with an actual first draft. However, Morris fails at making the same systematic effort for the revisions, leaving most of the work to the writer's instinct or judgment, while working off a very obvious checklist.
Bottom line: Morris system is helpful even for authors who already finished their first draft, because the advice makes a sound, workable first draft with a sound, high and low story instead of a messy jumble. The book is great for that alone, but I would consult a second book for revision or even devise my own system for a revision that does more justice to the draft. All in all, this book is more practical and to.the point that King's book, which is hailed as the bible.of writers but really didn't tell me anything new.