History of Julias Caesar is an entertaining and approachable book. I enjoyed reading it and sped through it quickly. However, it’s written more like an adventure novel than a work of scholarship, and I highly doubt the accuracy of the details; there are no footnotes, endnotes, or references/attributions of any kind, and there are some details given that seem to me would be impossible for the author to know, such as the internal thoughts of individuals shortly before their deaths. I am only confident in the “broad strokes” of the events Abbott provided.
Furthermore, the book is heavily tinged with Victorian morality and a puritan, Christian sentimentality. For example, at one point, the author spends some time talking about how “sinful” Cleopatra was, and, at another, how Cato’s suicide was shameful, irrational, and a “sin” – though the author decided he deserved some reprieve on the moral side due to the fact that Cato lived before the spread of Christianity. To me, however, the suicide seemed a courageous action that revealed Cato’s strength of belief and integrity. I’m very much looking forward to reading more reliable biographies, to corroborate what I learned here, and also because I’m curious how the historical record has interpreted Cato’s suicide. These two examples are not the only times that Abbott’s very subjective beliefs creeped into the narrative in a very, shall I venture to say, unethical manner.
What was interesting about this book was the mixture of praise and condemnation Abbott directed towards Caesar; at times he seemed to be shrinking back in disapproval of Caesar’s violence and brutality, and at other times he sang hymns of praise about Caesar’s honor and generosity. I think this has to do with the complexity of Caesar the man, but I note this because it made this feel like a more multifaceted portrayal.
Unfortunately, Abbott definitely was rather unfair or biased in his evaluation of the women, in that he castigated Cleopatra for the same things he praised Caesar for, but I suppose that’s nothing new in a book from the 19th century. (I swear, Gibbon was not this bad! He had a lot of nice things to say about Zenobia, I remember.) Overall, I would recommend this for someone looking for an entertaining, narrative-style biography of Caesar, for those new to the subject, but I doubt anyone well-read on Caesar or the Roman empire would enjoy, let alone appreciate, this.
…But if you do read it, tell me how much of it Abbott is making up or exaggerating!! I’m dying to know.
Also, I am quite surprised by how many ratings and reviews this book has here on Goodreads? I expected it to be one of those books that has zero reviews and two ratings, like a few old books about Oscar Wilde I’ve read, but I must have stumbled upon a more popular piece of scholarship than I realized.
One other thing: Goodreads doesn’t seem to have the exact edition I read; the publisher of my copy was A. L. Burt Company Publishers, and the copy has 228 pages.
Edit: I just saw this: "Biography of the Roman military and political leader from the 19th Century American writer of history and biographies for children [italics mine]." In retrospect, that explains how un-scholarly this was. It seemed a little too easy to read...